Cargando…
The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates
We compared egg size phenotypes and tested several predictions from the optimal egg size (OES) and bet‐hedging theories in two North American desert‐dwelling sister tortoise taxa, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai, that inhabit different climate spaces: relatively unpredictable and more predictable...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2838 |
_version_ | 1783233535225626624 |
---|---|
author | Ennen, Joshua R. Lovich, Jeffrey E. Averill‐Murray, Roy C. Yackulic, Charles B. Agha, Mickey Loughran, Caleb Tennant, Laura Sinervo, Barry |
author_facet | Ennen, Joshua R. Lovich, Jeffrey E. Averill‐Murray, Roy C. Yackulic, Charles B. Agha, Mickey Loughran, Caleb Tennant, Laura Sinervo, Barry |
author_sort | Ennen, Joshua R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We compared egg size phenotypes and tested several predictions from the optimal egg size (OES) and bet‐hedging theories in two North American desert‐dwelling sister tortoise taxa, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai, that inhabit different climate spaces: relatively unpredictable and more predictable climate spaces, respectively. Observed patterns in both species differed from the predictions of OES in several ways. Mean egg size increased with maternal body size in both species. Mean egg size was inversely related to clutch order in G. agassizii, a strategy more consistent with the within‐generation hypothesis arising out of bet‐hedging theory or a constraint in egg investment due to resource availability, and contrary to theories of density dependence, which posit that increasing hatchling competition from later season clutches should drive selection for larger eggs. We provide empirical evidence that one species, G. agassizii, employs a bet‐hedging strategy that is a combination of two different bet‐hedging hypotheses. Additionally, we found some evidence for G. morafkai employing a conservative bet‐hedging strategy. (e.g., lack of intra‐ and interclutch variation in egg size relative to body size). Our novel adaptive hypothesis suggests the possibility that natural selection favors smaller offspring in late‐season clutches because they experience a more benign environment or less energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., winter) than early clutch progeny, that emerge under harsher and more energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., summer). We also discuss alternative hypotheses of sexually antagonistic selection, which arise from the trade‐offs of son versus daughter production that might have different optima depending on clutch order and variation in temperature‐dependent sex determination (TSD) among clutches. Resolution of these hypotheses will require long‐term data on fitness of sons versus daughters as a function of incubation environment, data as yet unavailable for any species with TSD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5415531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54155312017-05-05 The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates Ennen, Joshua R. Lovich, Jeffrey E. Averill‐Murray, Roy C. Yackulic, Charles B. Agha, Mickey Loughran, Caleb Tennant, Laura Sinervo, Barry Ecol Evol Original Research We compared egg size phenotypes and tested several predictions from the optimal egg size (OES) and bet‐hedging theories in two North American desert‐dwelling sister tortoise taxa, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai, that inhabit different climate spaces: relatively unpredictable and more predictable climate spaces, respectively. Observed patterns in both species differed from the predictions of OES in several ways. Mean egg size increased with maternal body size in both species. Mean egg size was inversely related to clutch order in G. agassizii, a strategy more consistent with the within‐generation hypothesis arising out of bet‐hedging theory or a constraint in egg investment due to resource availability, and contrary to theories of density dependence, which posit that increasing hatchling competition from later season clutches should drive selection for larger eggs. We provide empirical evidence that one species, G. agassizii, employs a bet‐hedging strategy that is a combination of two different bet‐hedging hypotheses. Additionally, we found some evidence for G. morafkai employing a conservative bet‐hedging strategy. (e.g., lack of intra‐ and interclutch variation in egg size relative to body size). Our novel adaptive hypothesis suggests the possibility that natural selection favors smaller offspring in late‐season clutches because they experience a more benign environment or less energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., winter) than early clutch progeny, that emerge under harsher and more energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., summer). We also discuss alternative hypotheses of sexually antagonistic selection, which arise from the trade‐offs of son versus daughter production that might have different optima depending on clutch order and variation in temperature‐dependent sex determination (TSD) among clutches. Resolution of these hypotheses will require long‐term data on fitness of sons versus daughters as a function of incubation environment, data as yet unavailable for any species with TSD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5415531/ /pubmed/28480017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2838 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ennen, Joshua R. Lovich, Jeffrey E. Averill‐Murray, Roy C. Yackulic, Charles B. Agha, Mickey Loughran, Caleb Tennant, Laura Sinervo, Barry The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates |
title | The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates |
title_full | The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates |
title_fullStr | The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates |
title_full_unstemmed | The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates |
title_short | The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates |
title_sort | evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ennenjoshuar theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT lovichjeffreye theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT averillmurrayroyc theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT yackuliccharlesb theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT aghamickey theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT loughrancaleb theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT tennantlaura theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT sinervobarry theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT ennenjoshuar evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT lovichjeffreye evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT averillmurrayroyc evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT yackuliccharlesb evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT aghamickey evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT loughrancaleb evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT tennantlaura evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates AT sinervobarry evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates |