Cargando…

The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates

We compared egg size phenotypes and tested several predictions from the optimal egg size (OES) and bet‐hedging theories in two North American desert‐dwelling sister tortoise taxa, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai, that inhabit different climate spaces: relatively unpredictable and more predictable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ennen, Joshua R., Lovich, Jeffrey E., Averill‐Murray, Roy C., Yackulic, Charles B., Agha, Mickey, Loughran, Caleb, Tennant, Laura, Sinervo, Barry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2838
_version_ 1783233535225626624
author Ennen, Joshua R.
Lovich, Jeffrey E.
Averill‐Murray, Roy C.
Yackulic, Charles B.
Agha, Mickey
Loughran, Caleb
Tennant, Laura
Sinervo, Barry
author_facet Ennen, Joshua R.
Lovich, Jeffrey E.
Averill‐Murray, Roy C.
Yackulic, Charles B.
Agha, Mickey
Loughran, Caleb
Tennant, Laura
Sinervo, Barry
author_sort Ennen, Joshua R.
collection PubMed
description We compared egg size phenotypes and tested several predictions from the optimal egg size (OES) and bet‐hedging theories in two North American desert‐dwelling sister tortoise taxa, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai, that inhabit different climate spaces: relatively unpredictable and more predictable climate spaces, respectively. Observed patterns in both species differed from the predictions of OES in several ways. Mean egg size increased with maternal body size in both species. Mean egg size was inversely related to clutch order in G. agassizii, a strategy more consistent with the within‐generation hypothesis arising out of bet‐hedging theory or a constraint in egg investment due to resource availability, and contrary to theories of density dependence, which posit that increasing hatchling competition from later season clutches should drive selection for larger eggs. We provide empirical evidence that one species, G. agassizii, employs a bet‐hedging strategy that is a combination of two different bet‐hedging hypotheses. Additionally, we found some evidence for G. morafkai employing a conservative bet‐hedging strategy. (e.g., lack of intra‐ and interclutch variation in egg size relative to body size). Our novel adaptive hypothesis suggests the possibility that natural selection favors smaller offspring in late‐season clutches because they experience a more benign environment or less energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., winter) than early clutch progeny, that emerge under harsher and more energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., summer). We also discuss alternative hypotheses of sexually antagonistic selection, which arise from the trade‐offs of son versus daughter production that might have different optima depending on clutch order and variation in temperature‐dependent sex determination (TSD) among clutches. Resolution of these hypotheses will require long‐term data on fitness of sons versus daughters as a function of incubation environment, data as yet unavailable for any species with TSD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5415531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54155312017-05-05 The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates Ennen, Joshua R. Lovich, Jeffrey E. Averill‐Murray, Roy C. Yackulic, Charles B. Agha, Mickey Loughran, Caleb Tennant, Laura Sinervo, Barry Ecol Evol Original Research We compared egg size phenotypes and tested several predictions from the optimal egg size (OES) and bet‐hedging theories in two North American desert‐dwelling sister tortoise taxa, Gopherus agassizii and G. morafkai, that inhabit different climate spaces: relatively unpredictable and more predictable climate spaces, respectively. Observed patterns in both species differed from the predictions of OES in several ways. Mean egg size increased with maternal body size in both species. Mean egg size was inversely related to clutch order in G. agassizii, a strategy more consistent with the within‐generation hypothesis arising out of bet‐hedging theory or a constraint in egg investment due to resource availability, and contrary to theories of density dependence, which posit that increasing hatchling competition from later season clutches should drive selection for larger eggs. We provide empirical evidence that one species, G. agassizii, employs a bet‐hedging strategy that is a combination of two different bet‐hedging hypotheses. Additionally, we found some evidence for G. morafkai employing a conservative bet‐hedging strategy. (e.g., lack of intra‐ and interclutch variation in egg size relative to body size). Our novel adaptive hypothesis suggests the possibility that natural selection favors smaller offspring in late‐season clutches because they experience a more benign environment or less energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., winter) than early clutch progeny, that emerge under harsher and more energetically challenging environmental conditions (i.e., summer). We also discuss alternative hypotheses of sexually antagonistic selection, which arise from the trade‐offs of son versus daughter production that might have different optima depending on clutch order and variation in temperature‐dependent sex determination (TSD) among clutches. Resolution of these hypotheses will require long‐term data on fitness of sons versus daughters as a function of incubation environment, data as yet unavailable for any species with TSD. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5415531/ /pubmed/28480017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2838 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ennen, Joshua R.
Lovich, Jeffrey E.
Averill‐Murray, Roy C.
Yackulic, Charles B.
Agha, Mickey
Loughran, Caleb
Tennant, Laura
Sinervo, Barry
The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates
title The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates
title_full The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates
title_fullStr The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates
title_short The evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates
title_sort evolution of different maternal investment strategies in two closely related desert vertebrates
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480017
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2838
work_keys_str_mv AT ennenjoshuar theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT lovichjeffreye theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT averillmurrayroyc theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT yackuliccharlesb theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT aghamickey theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT loughrancaleb theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT tennantlaura theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT sinervobarry theevolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT ennenjoshuar evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT lovichjeffreye evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT averillmurrayroyc evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT yackuliccharlesb evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT aghamickey evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT loughrancaleb evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT tennantlaura evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates
AT sinervobarry evolutionofdifferentmaternalinvestmentstrategiesintwocloselyrelateddesertvertebrates