Cargando…

Trunk Muscle Activity during Drop Jump Performance in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain

In the context of back pain, great emphasis has been placed on the importance of trunk stability, especially in situations requiring compensation of repetitive, intense loading induced during high-performance activities, e.g., jumping or landing. This study aims to evaluate trunk muscle activity dur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mueller, Steffen, Stoll, Josefine, Mueller, Juliane, Cassel, Michael, Mayer, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28522976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00274
_version_ 1783233557147156480
author Mueller, Steffen
Stoll, Josefine
Mueller, Juliane
Cassel, Michael
Mayer, Frank
author_facet Mueller, Steffen
Stoll, Josefine
Mueller, Juliane
Cassel, Michael
Mayer, Frank
author_sort Mueller, Steffen
collection PubMed
description In the context of back pain, great emphasis has been placed on the importance of trunk stability, especially in situations requiring compensation of repetitive, intense loading induced during high-performance activities, e.g., jumping or landing. This study aims to evaluate trunk muscle activity during drop jump in adolescent athletes with back pain (BP) compared to athletes without back pain (NBP). Eleven adolescent athletes suffering back pain (BP: m/f: n = 4/7; 15.9 ± 1.3 y; 176 ± 11 cm; 68 ± 11 kg; 12.4 ± 10.5 h/we training) and 11 matched athletes without back pain (NBP: m/f: n = 4/7; 15.5 ± 1.3 y; 174 ± 7 cm; 67 ± 8 kg; 14.9 ± 9.5 h/we training) were evaluated. Subjects conducted 3 drop jumps onto a force plate (ground reaction force). Bilateral 12-lead SEMG (surface Electromyography) was applied to assess trunk muscle activity. Ground contact time [ms], maximum vertical jump force [N], jump time [ms] and the jump performance index [m/s] were calculated for drop jumps. SEMG amplitudes (RMS: root mean square [%]) for all 12 single muscles were normalized to MIVC (maximum isometric voluntary contraction) and analyzed in 4 time windows (100 ms pre- and 200 ms post-initial ground contact, 100 ms pre- and 200 ms post-landing) as outcome variables. In addition, muscles were grouped and analyzed in ventral and dorsal muscles, as well as straight and transverse trunk muscles. Drop jump ground reaction force variables did not differ between NBP and BP (p > 0.05). Mm obliquus externus and internus abdominis presented higher SEMG amplitudes (1.3–1.9-fold) for BP (p < 0.05). Mm rectus abdominis, erector spinae thoracic/lumbar and latissimus dorsi did not differ (p > 0.05). The muscle group analysis over the whole jumping cycle showed statistically significantly higher SEMG amplitudes for BP in the ventral (p = 0.031) and transverse muscles (p = 0.020) compared to NBP. Higher activity of transverse, but not straight, trunk muscles might indicate a specific compensation strategy to support trunk stability in athletes with back pain during drop jumps. Therefore, exercises favoring the transverse trunk muscles could be recommended for back pain treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5415618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54156182017-05-18 Trunk Muscle Activity during Drop Jump Performance in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain Mueller, Steffen Stoll, Josefine Mueller, Juliane Cassel, Michael Mayer, Frank Front Physiol Physiology In the context of back pain, great emphasis has been placed on the importance of trunk stability, especially in situations requiring compensation of repetitive, intense loading induced during high-performance activities, e.g., jumping or landing. This study aims to evaluate trunk muscle activity during drop jump in adolescent athletes with back pain (BP) compared to athletes without back pain (NBP). Eleven adolescent athletes suffering back pain (BP: m/f: n = 4/7; 15.9 ± 1.3 y; 176 ± 11 cm; 68 ± 11 kg; 12.4 ± 10.5 h/we training) and 11 matched athletes without back pain (NBP: m/f: n = 4/7; 15.5 ± 1.3 y; 174 ± 7 cm; 67 ± 8 kg; 14.9 ± 9.5 h/we training) were evaluated. Subjects conducted 3 drop jumps onto a force plate (ground reaction force). Bilateral 12-lead SEMG (surface Electromyography) was applied to assess trunk muscle activity. Ground contact time [ms], maximum vertical jump force [N], jump time [ms] and the jump performance index [m/s] were calculated for drop jumps. SEMG amplitudes (RMS: root mean square [%]) for all 12 single muscles were normalized to MIVC (maximum isometric voluntary contraction) and analyzed in 4 time windows (100 ms pre- and 200 ms post-initial ground contact, 100 ms pre- and 200 ms post-landing) as outcome variables. In addition, muscles were grouped and analyzed in ventral and dorsal muscles, as well as straight and transverse trunk muscles. Drop jump ground reaction force variables did not differ between NBP and BP (p > 0.05). Mm obliquus externus and internus abdominis presented higher SEMG amplitudes (1.3–1.9-fold) for BP (p < 0.05). Mm rectus abdominis, erector spinae thoracic/lumbar and latissimus dorsi did not differ (p > 0.05). The muscle group analysis over the whole jumping cycle showed statistically significantly higher SEMG amplitudes for BP in the ventral (p = 0.031) and transverse muscles (p = 0.020) compared to NBP. Higher activity of transverse, but not straight, trunk muscles might indicate a specific compensation strategy to support trunk stability in athletes with back pain during drop jumps. Therefore, exercises favoring the transverse trunk muscles could be recommended for back pain treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5415618/ /pubmed/28522976 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00274 Text en Copyright © 2017 Mueller, Stoll, Mueller, Cassel and Mayer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Mueller, Steffen
Stoll, Josefine
Mueller, Juliane
Cassel, Michael
Mayer, Frank
Trunk Muscle Activity during Drop Jump Performance in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain
title Trunk Muscle Activity during Drop Jump Performance in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain
title_full Trunk Muscle Activity during Drop Jump Performance in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain
title_fullStr Trunk Muscle Activity during Drop Jump Performance in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain
title_full_unstemmed Trunk Muscle Activity during Drop Jump Performance in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain
title_short Trunk Muscle Activity during Drop Jump Performance in Adolescent Athletes with Back Pain
title_sort trunk muscle activity during drop jump performance in adolescent athletes with back pain
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28522976
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00274
work_keys_str_mv AT muellersteffen trunkmuscleactivityduringdropjumpperformanceinadolescentathleteswithbackpain
AT stolljosefine trunkmuscleactivityduringdropjumpperformanceinadolescentathleteswithbackpain
AT muellerjuliane trunkmuscleactivityduringdropjumpperformanceinadolescentathleteswithbackpain
AT casselmichael trunkmuscleactivityduringdropjumpperformanceinadolescentathleteswithbackpain
AT mayerfrank trunkmuscleactivityduringdropjumpperformanceinadolescentathleteswithbackpain