Cargando…

Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness

OBJECTIVES: External fixators are the traditional fixation method of choice for contaminated open fractures. However, patient acceptance is low due to the high profile and therefore physical burden of the constructs. An externalised locking compression plate is a low profile alternative. However, th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ang, B. F. H., Chen, J. Y., Yew, A. K. S., Chua, S. K., Chou, S. M., Chia, S. L., Koh, J. S. B., Howe, T. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.64.2000470
_version_ 1783233625239584768
author Ang, B. F. H.
Chen, J. Y.
Yew, A. K. S.
Chua, S. K.
Chou, S. M.
Chia, S. L.
Koh, J. S. B.
Howe, T. S.
author_facet Ang, B. F. H.
Chen, J. Y.
Yew, A. K. S.
Chua, S. K.
Chou, S. M.
Chia, S. L.
Koh, J. S. B.
Howe, T. S.
author_sort Ang, B. F. H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: External fixators are the traditional fixation method of choice for contaminated open fractures. However, patient acceptance is low due to the high profile and therefore physical burden of the constructs. An externalised locking compression plate is a low profile alternative. However, the biomechanical differences have not been assessed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the axial and torsional stiffness of the externalised titanium locking compression plate (ET-LCP), the externalised stainless steel locking compression plate (ESS-LCP) and the unilateral external fixator (UEF). METHODS: A fracture gap model was created to simulate comminuted mid-shaft tibia fractures using synthetic composite bones. Fifteen constructs were stabilised with ET-LCP, ESS-LCP or UEF (five constructs each). The constructs were loaded under both axial and torsional directions to determine construct stiffness. RESULTS: The mean axial stiffness was very similar for UEF (528 N/mm) and ESS-LCP (525 N/mm), while it was slightly lower for ET-LCP (469 N/mm). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing in all three groups demonstrated no significant difference (F(2,12) = 2.057, p = 0.171). There was a significant difference in mean torsional stiffness between the UEF (0.512 Nm/degree), the ESS-LCP (0.686 Nm/degree) and the ET-LCP (0.639 Nm/degree), as determined by one-way ANOVA (F(2,12) = 6.204, p = 0.014). A Tukey post hoc test revealed that the torsional stiffness of the ESS-LCP was statistically higher than that of the UEF by 0.174 Nm/degree (p = 0.013). No catastrophic failures were observed. CONCLUSION: Using the LCP as an external fixator may provide a viable and attractive alternative to the traditional UEF as its lower profile makes it more acceptable to patients, while not compromising on axial and torsional stiffness. Cite this article: B. F. H. Ang, J. Y. Chen, A. K. S. Yew, S. K. Chua, S. M. Chou, S. L. Chia, J. S. B. Koh, T. S. Howe. Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:216–223. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.64.2000470.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5415900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54159002017-05-17 Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness Ang, B. F. H. Chen, J. Y. Yew, A. K. S. Chua, S. K. Chou, S. M. Chia, S. L. Koh, J. S. B. Howe, T. S. Bone Joint Res Trauma OBJECTIVES: External fixators are the traditional fixation method of choice for contaminated open fractures. However, patient acceptance is low due to the high profile and therefore physical burden of the constructs. An externalised locking compression plate is a low profile alternative. However, the biomechanical differences have not been assessed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the axial and torsional stiffness of the externalised titanium locking compression plate (ET-LCP), the externalised stainless steel locking compression plate (ESS-LCP) and the unilateral external fixator (UEF). METHODS: A fracture gap model was created to simulate comminuted mid-shaft tibia fractures using synthetic composite bones. Fifteen constructs were stabilised with ET-LCP, ESS-LCP or UEF (five constructs each). The constructs were loaded under both axial and torsional directions to determine construct stiffness. RESULTS: The mean axial stiffness was very similar for UEF (528 N/mm) and ESS-LCP (525 N/mm), while it was slightly lower for ET-LCP (469 N/mm). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing in all three groups demonstrated no significant difference (F(2,12) = 2.057, p = 0.171). There was a significant difference in mean torsional stiffness between the UEF (0.512 Nm/degree), the ESS-LCP (0.686 Nm/degree) and the ET-LCP (0.639 Nm/degree), as determined by one-way ANOVA (F(2,12) = 6.204, p = 0.014). A Tukey post hoc test revealed that the torsional stiffness of the ESS-LCP was statistically higher than that of the UEF by 0.174 Nm/degree (p = 0.013). No catastrophic failures were observed. CONCLUSION: Using the LCP as an external fixator may provide a viable and attractive alternative to the traditional UEF as its lower profile makes it more acceptable to patients, while not compromising on axial and torsional stiffness. Cite this article: B. F. H. Ang, J. Y. Chen, A. K. S. Yew, S. K. Chua, S. M. Chou, S. L. Chia, J. S. B. Koh, T. S. Howe. Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:216–223. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.64.2000470. 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5415900/ /pubmed/28420623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.64.2000470 Text en © 2017 Ang et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Trauma
Ang, B. F. H.
Chen, J. Y.
Yew, A. K. S.
Chua, S. K.
Chou, S. M.
Chia, S. L.
Koh, J. S. B.
Howe, T. S.
Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness
title Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness
title_full Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness
title_fullStr Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness
title_full_unstemmed Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness
title_short Externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness
title_sort externalised locking compression plate as an alternative to the unilateral external fixator: a biomechanical comparative study of axial and torsional stiffness
topic Trauma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.64.2000470
work_keys_str_mv AT angbfh externalisedlockingcompressionplateasanalternativetotheunilateralexternalfixatorabiomechanicalcomparativestudyofaxialandtorsionalstiffness
AT chenjy externalisedlockingcompressionplateasanalternativetotheunilateralexternalfixatorabiomechanicalcomparativestudyofaxialandtorsionalstiffness
AT yewaks externalisedlockingcompressionplateasanalternativetotheunilateralexternalfixatorabiomechanicalcomparativestudyofaxialandtorsionalstiffness
AT chuask externalisedlockingcompressionplateasanalternativetotheunilateralexternalfixatorabiomechanicalcomparativestudyofaxialandtorsionalstiffness
AT chousm externalisedlockingcompressionplateasanalternativetotheunilateralexternalfixatorabiomechanicalcomparativestudyofaxialandtorsionalstiffness
AT chiasl externalisedlockingcompressionplateasanalternativetotheunilateralexternalfixatorabiomechanicalcomparativestudyofaxialandtorsionalstiffness
AT kohjsb externalisedlockingcompressionplateasanalternativetotheunilateralexternalfixatorabiomechanicalcomparativestudyofaxialandtorsionalstiffness
AT howets externalisedlockingcompressionplateasanalternativetotheunilateralexternalfixatorabiomechanicalcomparativestudyofaxialandtorsionalstiffness