Cargando…

A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model

OBJECTIVES: To compare the therapeutic potential of tissue-engineered constructs (TECs) combining mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and coral granules from either Acropora or Porites to repair large bone defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone marrow-derived, autologous MSCs were seeded on Acropora or Pori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Decambron, A., Manassero, M., Bensidhoum, M., Lecuelle, B., Logeart-Avramoglou, D., Petite, H., Viateau, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28408376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2016-0236.R1
_version_ 1783233625773309952
author Decambron, A.
Manassero, M.
Bensidhoum, M.
Lecuelle, B.
Logeart-Avramoglou, D.
Petite, H.
Viateau, V.
author_facet Decambron, A.
Manassero, M.
Bensidhoum, M.
Lecuelle, B.
Logeart-Avramoglou, D.
Petite, H.
Viateau, V.
author_sort Decambron, A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the therapeutic potential of tissue-engineered constructs (TECs) combining mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and coral granules from either Acropora or Porites to repair large bone defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone marrow-derived, autologous MSCs were seeded on Acropora or Porites coral granules in a perfusion bioreactor. Acropora-TECs (n = 7), Porites-TECs (n = 6) and bone autografts (n = 2) were then implanted into 25 mm long metatarsal diaphyseal defects in sheep. Bimonthly radiographic follow-up was completed until killing four months post-operatively. Explants were subsequently processed for microCT and histology to assess bone formation and coral bioresorption. Statistical analyses comprised Mann-Whitney, t-test and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Data were expressed as mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: A two-fold increaseof newly formed bone volume was observed for Acropora-TECs when compared with Porites-TECs (14 sd 1089 mm(3) versus 782 sd 507 mm(3); p = 0.09). Bone union was consistent with autograft (1960 sd 518 mm(3)). The kinetics of bioresorption and bioresorption rates at four months were different for Acropora-TECs and Porites-TECs (81% sd 5% versus 94% sd 6%; p = 0.04). In comparing the defects that healed with those that did not, we observed that, when major bioresorption of coral at two months occurs and a scaffold material bioresorption rate superior to 90% at four months is achieved, bone nonunion consistently occurred using coral-based TECs. DISCUSSION: Bone regeneration in critical-size defects could be obtained with full bioresorption of the scaffold using coral-based TECs in a large animal model. The superior performance of Acropora-TECs brings us closer to a clinical application, probably because of more suitable bioresorption kinetics. However, nonunion still occurred in nearly half of the bone defects. Cite this article: A. Decambron, M. Manassero, M. Bensidhoum, B. Lecuelle, D. Logeart-Avramoglou, H. Petite, V. Viateau. A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:208–215. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2016-0236.R1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5415902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54159022017-05-17 A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model Decambron, A. Manassero, M. Bensidhoum, M. Lecuelle, B. Logeart-Avramoglou, D. Petite, H. Viateau, V. Bone Joint Res Research OBJECTIVES: To compare the therapeutic potential of tissue-engineered constructs (TECs) combining mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and coral granules from either Acropora or Porites to repair large bone defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone marrow-derived, autologous MSCs were seeded on Acropora or Porites coral granules in a perfusion bioreactor. Acropora-TECs (n = 7), Porites-TECs (n = 6) and bone autografts (n = 2) were then implanted into 25 mm long metatarsal diaphyseal defects in sheep. Bimonthly radiographic follow-up was completed until killing four months post-operatively. Explants were subsequently processed for microCT and histology to assess bone formation and coral bioresorption. Statistical analyses comprised Mann-Whitney, t-test and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Data were expressed as mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: A two-fold increaseof newly formed bone volume was observed for Acropora-TECs when compared with Porites-TECs (14 sd 1089 mm(3) versus 782 sd 507 mm(3); p = 0.09). Bone union was consistent with autograft (1960 sd 518 mm(3)). The kinetics of bioresorption and bioresorption rates at four months were different for Acropora-TECs and Porites-TECs (81% sd 5% versus 94% sd 6%; p = 0.04). In comparing the defects that healed with those that did not, we observed that, when major bioresorption of coral at two months occurs and a scaffold material bioresorption rate superior to 90% at four months is achieved, bone nonunion consistently occurred using coral-based TECs. DISCUSSION: Bone regeneration in critical-size defects could be obtained with full bioresorption of the scaffold using coral-based TECs in a large animal model. The superior performance of Acropora-TECs brings us closer to a clinical application, probably because of more suitable bioresorption kinetics. However, nonunion still occurred in nearly half of the bone defects. Cite this article: A. Decambron, M. Manassero, M. Bensidhoum, B. Lecuelle, D. Logeart-Avramoglou, H. Petite, V. Viateau. A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:208–215. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2016-0236.R1. 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5415902/ /pubmed/28408376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2016-0236.R1 Text en © 2017 Decambron et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Decambron, A.
Manassero, M.
Bensidhoum, M.
Lecuelle, B.
Logeart-Avramoglou, D.
Petite, H.
Viateau, V.
A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model
title A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model
title_full A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model
title_fullStr A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model
title_short A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model
title_sort comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from acropora and porites coral in a large animal bone defect model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28408376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2016-0236.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT decambrona acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT manasserom acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT bensidhoumm acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT lecuelleb acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT logeartavramogloud acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT petiteh acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT viateauv acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT decambrona comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT manasserom comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT bensidhoumm comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT lecuelleb comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT logeartavramogloud comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT petiteh comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel
AT viateauv comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel