Cargando…
A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model
OBJECTIVES: To compare the therapeutic potential of tissue-engineered constructs (TECs) combining mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and coral granules from either Acropora or Porites to repair large bone defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone marrow-derived, autologous MSCs were seeded on Acropora or Pori...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28408376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2016-0236.R1 |
_version_ | 1783233625773309952 |
---|---|
author | Decambron, A. Manassero, M. Bensidhoum, M. Lecuelle, B. Logeart-Avramoglou, D. Petite, H. Viateau, V. |
author_facet | Decambron, A. Manassero, M. Bensidhoum, M. Lecuelle, B. Logeart-Avramoglou, D. Petite, H. Viateau, V. |
author_sort | Decambron, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the therapeutic potential of tissue-engineered constructs (TECs) combining mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and coral granules from either Acropora or Porites to repair large bone defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone marrow-derived, autologous MSCs were seeded on Acropora or Porites coral granules in a perfusion bioreactor. Acropora-TECs (n = 7), Porites-TECs (n = 6) and bone autografts (n = 2) were then implanted into 25 mm long metatarsal diaphyseal defects in sheep. Bimonthly radiographic follow-up was completed until killing four months post-operatively. Explants were subsequently processed for microCT and histology to assess bone formation and coral bioresorption. Statistical analyses comprised Mann-Whitney, t-test and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Data were expressed as mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: A two-fold increaseof newly formed bone volume was observed for Acropora-TECs when compared with Porites-TECs (14 sd 1089 mm(3) versus 782 sd 507 mm(3); p = 0.09). Bone union was consistent with autograft (1960 sd 518 mm(3)). The kinetics of bioresorption and bioresorption rates at four months were different for Acropora-TECs and Porites-TECs (81% sd 5% versus 94% sd 6%; p = 0.04). In comparing the defects that healed with those that did not, we observed that, when major bioresorption of coral at two months occurs and a scaffold material bioresorption rate superior to 90% at four months is achieved, bone nonunion consistently occurred using coral-based TECs. DISCUSSION: Bone regeneration in critical-size defects could be obtained with full bioresorption of the scaffold using coral-based TECs in a large animal model. The superior performance of Acropora-TECs brings us closer to a clinical application, probably because of more suitable bioresorption kinetics. However, nonunion still occurred in nearly half of the bone defects. Cite this article: A. Decambron, M. Manassero, M. Bensidhoum, B. Lecuelle, D. Logeart-Avramoglou, H. Petite, V. Viateau. A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:208–215. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2016-0236.R1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5415902 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54159022017-05-17 A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model Decambron, A. Manassero, M. Bensidhoum, M. Lecuelle, B. Logeart-Avramoglou, D. Petite, H. Viateau, V. Bone Joint Res Research OBJECTIVES: To compare the therapeutic potential of tissue-engineered constructs (TECs) combining mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and coral granules from either Acropora or Porites to repair large bone defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone marrow-derived, autologous MSCs were seeded on Acropora or Porites coral granules in a perfusion bioreactor. Acropora-TECs (n = 7), Porites-TECs (n = 6) and bone autografts (n = 2) were then implanted into 25 mm long metatarsal diaphyseal defects in sheep. Bimonthly radiographic follow-up was completed until killing four months post-operatively. Explants were subsequently processed for microCT and histology to assess bone formation and coral bioresorption. Statistical analyses comprised Mann-Whitney, t-test and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Data were expressed as mean and standard deviation. RESULTS: A two-fold increaseof newly formed bone volume was observed for Acropora-TECs when compared with Porites-TECs (14 sd 1089 mm(3) versus 782 sd 507 mm(3); p = 0.09). Bone union was consistent with autograft (1960 sd 518 mm(3)). The kinetics of bioresorption and bioresorption rates at four months were different for Acropora-TECs and Porites-TECs (81% sd 5% versus 94% sd 6%; p = 0.04). In comparing the defects that healed with those that did not, we observed that, when major bioresorption of coral at two months occurs and a scaffold material bioresorption rate superior to 90% at four months is achieved, bone nonunion consistently occurred using coral-based TECs. DISCUSSION: Bone regeneration in critical-size defects could be obtained with full bioresorption of the scaffold using coral-based TECs in a large animal model. The superior performance of Acropora-TECs brings us closer to a clinical application, probably because of more suitable bioresorption kinetics. However, nonunion still occurred in nearly half of the bone defects. Cite this article: A. Decambron, M. Manassero, M. Bensidhoum, B. Lecuelle, D. Logeart-Avramoglou, H. Petite, V. Viateau. A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:208–215. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2016-0236.R1. 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5415902/ /pubmed/28408376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2016-0236.R1 Text en © 2017 Decambron et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Decambron, A. Manassero, M. Bensidhoum, M. Lecuelle, B. Logeart-Avramoglou, D. Petite, H. Viateau, V. A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model |
title | A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model |
title_full | A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model |
title_fullStr | A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model |
title_short | A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model |
title_sort | comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from acropora and porites coral in a large animal bone defect model |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28408376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2016-0236.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decambrona acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT manasserom acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT bensidhoumm acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT lecuelleb acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT logeartavramogloud acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT petiteh acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT viateauv acomparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT decambrona comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT manasserom comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT bensidhoumm comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT lecuelleb comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT logeartavramogloud comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT petiteh comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel AT viateauv comparativestudyoftissueengineeredconstructsfromacroporaandporitescoralinalargeanimalbonedefectmodel |