Cargando…
Benefit of dual-chamber pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in tilt-induced cardio-inhibitory reflex syncope (BIOSync trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of dual-chamber cardiac pacing in neuro-mediated reflex syncope with a cardio-inhibitory response to the Tilt-Table test (TT) has not been definitively assessed so far. The lack of reproducibility of results from previous studies may be partially explained by discrepancies i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1941-4 |
_version_ | 1783233634337030144 |
---|---|
author | Brignole, Michele Tomaino, Marco Aerts, Arnaud Ammirati, Fabrizio Ayala-Parades, Félix Alejandro Deharo, Jean-Claude Del Rosso, Attilio Hamdan, Mohamed H. Lunati, Maurizio Moya, Angel Gargaro, Alessio |
author_facet | Brignole, Michele Tomaino, Marco Aerts, Arnaud Ammirati, Fabrizio Ayala-Parades, Félix Alejandro Deharo, Jean-Claude Del Rosso, Attilio Hamdan, Mohamed H. Lunati, Maurizio Moya, Angel Gargaro, Alessio |
author_sort | Brignole, Michele |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The efficacy of dual-chamber cardiac pacing in neuro-mediated reflex syncope with a cardio-inhibitory response to the Tilt-Table test (TT) has not been definitively assessed so far. The lack of reproducibility of results from previous studies may be partially explained by discrepancies in subject selection and some weaknesses in design and methods. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has set a class IIb indication to pacemaker implantation in this population recommending further research. METHODS/DESIGN: The BIOSync study is a multicenter, patient- and outcome-assessor-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled trial with the objective of assessing the clinical benefit of cardiac pacing in patients with frequently recurrent reflex syncope, suspected (but not proven) to be triggered by asystolic pauses as showing a VASIS 2B response to the TT (>3-s pause regardless of blood pressure drop). The primary and secondary endpoints are time to first post-implantation recurrence of syncope or the combination of pre-syncope or syncope, respectively. One hundred and twenty-eight consenting patients will be 1:1 randomized to dual-chamber cardiac pacing ‘on’ or ‘off’ after pacemaker implantation, and followed up until the first adjudicated primary endpoint event for a maximum of 2 years. The so-called Closed Loop Stimulation function on top of dual-chamber pacing is the pacing mode selected in the study active arm. Participating patients are asked to self-report syncopal symptoms at least every 3 months with self-administered questionnaires addressed to an independent Adjudication Committee. Patients and members of the Adjudicating Committee are blinded to randomization. The study is designed to detect a 40% relative reduction in the 2-year incidence of syncopal recurrences with 80% statistical power. DISCUSSION: The BIOSync study is designed to definitively assess the benefit of pacing against placebo in reflex syncope patients with a cardio-inhibitory response to the TT. The study will also provide important information on the efficiency of the TT in appropriately selecting reflex syncope patients for cardiac pacing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02324920 (27 October 2016, date last accessed). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1941-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5415949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54159492017-05-04 Benefit of dual-chamber pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in tilt-induced cardio-inhibitory reflex syncope (BIOSync trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Brignole, Michele Tomaino, Marco Aerts, Arnaud Ammirati, Fabrizio Ayala-Parades, Félix Alejandro Deharo, Jean-Claude Del Rosso, Attilio Hamdan, Mohamed H. Lunati, Maurizio Moya, Angel Gargaro, Alessio Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The efficacy of dual-chamber cardiac pacing in neuro-mediated reflex syncope with a cardio-inhibitory response to the Tilt-Table test (TT) has not been definitively assessed so far. The lack of reproducibility of results from previous studies may be partially explained by discrepancies in subject selection and some weaknesses in design and methods. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has set a class IIb indication to pacemaker implantation in this population recommending further research. METHODS/DESIGN: The BIOSync study is a multicenter, patient- and outcome-assessor-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled trial with the objective of assessing the clinical benefit of cardiac pacing in patients with frequently recurrent reflex syncope, suspected (but not proven) to be triggered by asystolic pauses as showing a VASIS 2B response to the TT (>3-s pause regardless of blood pressure drop). The primary and secondary endpoints are time to first post-implantation recurrence of syncope or the combination of pre-syncope or syncope, respectively. One hundred and twenty-eight consenting patients will be 1:1 randomized to dual-chamber cardiac pacing ‘on’ or ‘off’ after pacemaker implantation, and followed up until the first adjudicated primary endpoint event for a maximum of 2 years. The so-called Closed Loop Stimulation function on top of dual-chamber pacing is the pacing mode selected in the study active arm. Participating patients are asked to self-report syncopal symptoms at least every 3 months with self-administered questionnaires addressed to an independent Adjudication Committee. Patients and members of the Adjudicating Committee are blinded to randomization. The study is designed to detect a 40% relative reduction in the 2-year incidence of syncopal recurrences with 80% statistical power. DISCUSSION: The BIOSync study is designed to definitively assess the benefit of pacing against placebo in reflex syncope patients with a cardio-inhibitory response to the TT. The study will also provide important information on the efficiency of the TT in appropriately selecting reflex syncope patients for cardiac pacing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02324920 (27 October 2016, date last accessed). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1941-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5415949/ /pubmed/28472974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1941-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Brignole, Michele Tomaino, Marco Aerts, Arnaud Ammirati, Fabrizio Ayala-Parades, Félix Alejandro Deharo, Jean-Claude Del Rosso, Attilio Hamdan, Mohamed H. Lunati, Maurizio Moya, Angel Gargaro, Alessio Benefit of dual-chamber pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in tilt-induced cardio-inhibitory reflex syncope (BIOSync trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Benefit of dual-chamber pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in tilt-induced cardio-inhibitory reflex syncope (BIOSync trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Benefit of dual-chamber pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in tilt-induced cardio-inhibitory reflex syncope (BIOSync trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Benefit of dual-chamber pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in tilt-induced cardio-inhibitory reflex syncope (BIOSync trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefit of dual-chamber pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in tilt-induced cardio-inhibitory reflex syncope (BIOSync trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Benefit of dual-chamber pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in tilt-induced cardio-inhibitory reflex syncope (BIOSync trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | benefit of dual-chamber pacing with closed loop stimulation in tilt-induced cardio-inhibitory reflex syncope (biosync trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5415949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1941-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brignolemichele benefitofdualchamberpacingwithclosedloopstimulationintiltinducedcardioinhibitoryreflexsyncopebiosynctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tomainomarco benefitofdualchamberpacingwithclosedloopstimulationintiltinducedcardioinhibitoryreflexsyncopebiosynctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT aertsarnaud benefitofdualchamberpacingwithclosedloopstimulationintiltinducedcardioinhibitoryreflexsyncopebiosynctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ammiratifabrizio benefitofdualchamberpacingwithclosedloopstimulationintiltinducedcardioinhibitoryreflexsyncopebiosynctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ayalaparadesfelixalejandro benefitofdualchamberpacingwithclosedloopstimulationintiltinducedcardioinhibitoryreflexsyncopebiosynctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT deharojeanclaude benefitofdualchamberpacingwithclosedloopstimulationintiltinducedcardioinhibitoryreflexsyncopebiosynctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT delrossoattilio benefitofdualchamberpacingwithclosedloopstimulationintiltinducedcardioinhibitoryreflexsyncopebiosynctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hamdanmohamedh benefitofdualchamberpacingwithclosedloopstimulationintiltinducedcardioinhibitoryreflexsyncopebiosynctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lunatimaurizio benefitofdualchamberpacingwithclosedloopstimulationintiltinducedcardioinhibitoryreflexsyncopebiosynctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT moyaangel benefitofdualchamberpacingwithclosedloopstimulationintiltinducedcardioinhibitoryreflexsyncopebiosynctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gargaroalessio benefitofdualchamberpacingwithclosedloopstimulationintiltinducedcardioinhibitoryreflexsyncopebiosynctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT benefitofdualchamberpacingwithclosedloopstimulationintiltinducedcardioinhibitoryreflexsyncopebiosynctrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |