Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of Video Stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Video Stylet (VS) is a new intubating modality that provides real-time video of endotracheal intubation (ETI). This device does not need alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes to view glottis and can be used in patients with limited mouth opening. The aim of this st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amir, Syed Hussain, Ali, Qazi Ehsan, Bansal, Sonali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5416722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515520
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_501_16
_version_ 1783233807432810496
author Amir, Syed Hussain
Ali, Qazi Ehsan
Bansal, Sonali
author_facet Amir, Syed Hussain
Ali, Qazi Ehsan
Bansal, Sonali
author_sort Amir, Syed Hussain
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Video Stylet (VS) is a new intubating modality that provides real-time video of endotracheal intubation (ETI). This device does not need alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes to view glottis and can be used in patients with limited mouth opening. The aim of this study was to compare flexible fibre-optic (FO) bronchoscope with VS in elective surgical patients in apparently normal airway patients requiring oral ETI. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia of age group 20–60 years, weight 40–70 kg, American Society of Anesthesiologist 1 and 2 and modified Mallampatti I and II were included in the study. Patients in group FO (n = 30) were intubated by flexible FO bronchoscope, whereas patients in group VS (n = 30) were intubated by VS. Primary outcome measure was time taken for intubation (TTI). Secondary outcome measures were successful intubation, haemodynamic response and post-operative complications if any. RESULTS: Average TTI in cases of FO group was 38.2 s (95% confidence interval [CI] 36–41) and in VS group was 19.7 s (95% CI 19–21; P = 0.0001). Three patients required a second attempt for successful intubation in FO group compared to eight in VS group (P = 0.2), with no failures in any group. Haemodynamic response and complications rate were greater in VS group; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: VS takes lesser time to intubate than flexible FO bronchoscope.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5416722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54167222017-05-17 A comparative evaluation of Video Stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients Amir, Syed Hussain Ali, Qazi Ehsan Bansal, Sonali Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Video Stylet (VS) is a new intubating modality that provides real-time video of endotracheal intubation (ETI). This device does not need alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes to view glottis and can be used in patients with limited mouth opening. The aim of this study was to compare flexible fibre-optic (FO) bronchoscope with VS in elective surgical patients in apparently normal airway patients requiring oral ETI. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia of age group 20–60 years, weight 40–70 kg, American Society of Anesthesiologist 1 and 2 and modified Mallampatti I and II were included in the study. Patients in group FO (n = 30) were intubated by flexible FO bronchoscope, whereas patients in group VS (n = 30) were intubated by VS. Primary outcome measure was time taken for intubation (TTI). Secondary outcome measures were successful intubation, haemodynamic response and post-operative complications if any. RESULTS: Average TTI in cases of FO group was 38.2 s (95% confidence interval [CI] 36–41) and in VS group was 19.7 s (95% CI 19–21; P = 0.0001). Three patients required a second attempt for successful intubation in FO group compared to eight in VS group (P = 0.2), with no failures in any group. Haemodynamic response and complications rate were greater in VS group; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: VS takes lesser time to intubate than flexible FO bronchoscope. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5416722/ /pubmed/28515520 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_501_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Amir, Syed Hussain
Ali, Qazi Ehsan
Bansal, Sonali
A comparative evaluation of Video Stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients
title A comparative evaluation of Video Stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients
title_full A comparative evaluation of Video Stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of Video Stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of Video Stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients
title_short A comparative evaluation of Video Stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients
title_sort comparative evaluation of video stylet and flexible fibre-optic bronchoscope in the performance of intubation in adult patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5416722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515520
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_501_16
work_keys_str_mv AT amirsyedhussain acomparativeevaluationofvideostyletandflexiblefibreopticbronchoscopeintheperformanceofintubationinadultpatients
AT aliqaziehsan acomparativeevaluationofvideostyletandflexiblefibreopticbronchoscopeintheperformanceofintubationinadultpatients
AT bansalsonali acomparativeevaluationofvideostyletandflexiblefibreopticbronchoscopeintheperformanceofintubationinadultpatients
AT amirsyedhussain comparativeevaluationofvideostyletandflexiblefibreopticbronchoscopeintheperformanceofintubationinadultpatients
AT aliqaziehsan comparativeevaluationofvideostyletandflexiblefibreopticbronchoscopeintheperformanceofintubationinadultpatients
AT bansalsonali comparativeevaluationofvideostyletandflexiblefibreopticbronchoscopeintheperformanceofintubationinadultpatients