Cargando…

Distinct Roles of Opioid and Dopamine Systems in Lateral Hypothalamic Intracranial Self-Stimulation

BACKGROUND: Opioid and dopamine systems play crucial roles in reward. Similarities and differences in the neural mechanisms of reward that are mediated by these 2 systems have remained largely unknown. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the differences in reward function in both µ-opioid re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ide, Soichiro, Takahashi, Takehiro, Takamatsu, Yukio, Uhl, George R., Niki, Hiroaki, Sora, Ichiro, Ikeda, Kazutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyw113
_version_ 1783233857384873984
author Ide, Soichiro
Takahashi, Takehiro
Takamatsu, Yukio
Uhl, George R.
Niki, Hiroaki
Sora, Ichiro
Ikeda, Kazutaka
author_facet Ide, Soichiro
Takahashi, Takehiro
Takamatsu, Yukio
Uhl, George R.
Niki, Hiroaki
Sora, Ichiro
Ikeda, Kazutaka
author_sort Ide, Soichiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Opioid and dopamine systems play crucial roles in reward. Similarities and differences in the neural mechanisms of reward that are mediated by these 2 systems have remained largely unknown. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the differences in reward function in both µ-opioid receptor knockout mice and dopamine transporter knockout mice, important molecules in the opioid and dopamine systems. METHODS: Mice were implanted with electrodes into the right lateral hypothalamus (l hour). Mice were then trained to put their muzzle into the hole in the head-dipping chamber for intracranial electrical stimulation, and the influences of gene knockout were assessed. RESULTS: Significant differences are observed between opioid and dopamine systems in reward function. µ-Opioid receptor knockout mice exhibited enhanced intracranial electrical stimulation, which induced dopamine release. They also exhibited greater motility under conditions of “despair” in both the tail suspension test and water wheel test. In contrast, dopamine transporter knockout mice maintained intracranial electrical stimulation responding even when more active efforts were required to obtain the reward. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of µ-opioid receptor or dopamine transporter did not lead to the absence of intracranial electrical stimulation responsiveness but rather differentially altered it. The present results in µ-opioid receptor knockout mice are consistent with the suppressive involvement of µ-opioid receptors in both positive incentive motivation associated with intracranial electrical stimulation and negative incentive motivation associated with depressive states. In contrast, the results in dopamine transporter knockout mice are consistent with the involvement of dopamine transporters in positive incentive motivation, especially its persistence. Differences in intracranial electrical stimulation in µ-opioid receptor and dopamine transporter knockout mice underscore the multidimensional nature of reward.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5417052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54170522017-05-05 Distinct Roles of Opioid and Dopamine Systems in Lateral Hypothalamic Intracranial Self-Stimulation Ide, Soichiro Takahashi, Takehiro Takamatsu, Yukio Uhl, George R. Niki, Hiroaki Sora, Ichiro Ikeda, Kazutaka Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Regular Research Article BACKGROUND: Opioid and dopamine systems play crucial roles in reward. Similarities and differences in the neural mechanisms of reward that are mediated by these 2 systems have remained largely unknown. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the differences in reward function in both µ-opioid receptor knockout mice and dopamine transporter knockout mice, important molecules in the opioid and dopamine systems. METHODS: Mice were implanted with electrodes into the right lateral hypothalamus (l hour). Mice were then trained to put their muzzle into the hole in the head-dipping chamber for intracranial electrical stimulation, and the influences of gene knockout were assessed. RESULTS: Significant differences are observed between opioid and dopamine systems in reward function. µ-Opioid receptor knockout mice exhibited enhanced intracranial electrical stimulation, which induced dopamine release. They also exhibited greater motility under conditions of “despair” in both the tail suspension test and water wheel test. In contrast, dopamine transporter knockout mice maintained intracranial electrical stimulation responding even when more active efforts were required to obtain the reward. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of µ-opioid receptor or dopamine transporter did not lead to the absence of intracranial electrical stimulation responsiveness but rather differentially altered it. The present results in µ-opioid receptor knockout mice are consistent with the suppressive involvement of µ-opioid receptors in both positive incentive motivation associated with intracranial electrical stimulation and negative incentive motivation associated with depressive states. In contrast, the results in dopamine transporter knockout mice are consistent with the involvement of dopamine transporters in positive incentive motivation, especially its persistence. Differences in intracranial electrical stimulation in µ-opioid receptor and dopamine transporter knockout mice underscore the multidimensional nature of reward. Oxford University Press 2016-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5417052/ /pubmed/28031268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyw113 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Regular Research Article
Ide, Soichiro
Takahashi, Takehiro
Takamatsu, Yukio
Uhl, George R.
Niki, Hiroaki
Sora, Ichiro
Ikeda, Kazutaka
Distinct Roles of Opioid and Dopamine Systems in Lateral Hypothalamic Intracranial Self-Stimulation
title Distinct Roles of Opioid and Dopamine Systems in Lateral Hypothalamic Intracranial Self-Stimulation
title_full Distinct Roles of Opioid and Dopamine Systems in Lateral Hypothalamic Intracranial Self-Stimulation
title_fullStr Distinct Roles of Opioid and Dopamine Systems in Lateral Hypothalamic Intracranial Self-Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Distinct Roles of Opioid and Dopamine Systems in Lateral Hypothalamic Intracranial Self-Stimulation
title_short Distinct Roles of Opioid and Dopamine Systems in Lateral Hypothalamic Intracranial Self-Stimulation
title_sort distinct roles of opioid and dopamine systems in lateral hypothalamic intracranial self-stimulation
topic Regular Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28031268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyw113
work_keys_str_mv AT idesoichiro distinctrolesofopioidanddopaminesystemsinlateralhypothalamicintracranialselfstimulation
AT takahashitakehiro distinctrolesofopioidanddopaminesystemsinlateralhypothalamicintracranialselfstimulation
AT takamatsuyukio distinctrolesofopioidanddopaminesystemsinlateralhypothalamicintracranialselfstimulation
AT uhlgeorger distinctrolesofopioidanddopaminesystemsinlateralhypothalamicintracranialselfstimulation
AT nikihiroaki distinctrolesofopioidanddopaminesystemsinlateralhypothalamicintracranialselfstimulation
AT soraichiro distinctrolesofopioidanddopaminesystemsinlateralhypothalamicintracranialselfstimulation
AT ikedakazutaka distinctrolesofopioidanddopaminesystemsinlateralhypothalamicintracranialselfstimulation