Cargando…
Comparative swimming and station-holding ability of the threatened Rocky Mountain Sculpin (Cottus sp.) from four hydrologically distinct rivers
Hydrologic alterations, such as dams, culverts or diversions, can introduce new selection pressures on freshwater fishes, where they are required to adapt to novel environmental conditions. Our study investigated how species adapt to natural and altered stream flow, where we use the threatened Rocky...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cox026 |
_version_ | 1783233858356903936 |
---|---|
author | Veillard, Marie F. Ruppert, Jonathan L.W. Tierney, Keith Watkinson, Douglas A. Poesch, Mark |
author_facet | Veillard, Marie F. Ruppert, Jonathan L.W. Tierney, Keith Watkinson, Douglas A. Poesch, Mark |
author_sort | Veillard, Marie F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hydrologic alterations, such as dams, culverts or diversions, can introduce new selection pressures on freshwater fishes, where they are required to adapt to novel environmental conditions. Our study investigated how species adapt to natural and altered stream flow, where we use the threatened Rocky Mountain Sculpin (Cottus sp.) as a model organism. We compared the swimming and station-holding performance of Rocky Mountain Sculpin from four different hydrologic regimes in Alberta and British Columbia, including the North Milk River, a system that experiences increased flows from a large-scale diversion. We measured the slip (U(slip)) and failure (U(burst)) velocities over three constant acceleration test trials. U(slip) was defined as the point at which individuals required the addition of bursting or swimming to maintain position. U(burst) was defined as the point at which individuals were unable to hold position in the swimming chamber through swimming, bursting or holding techniques without fully or partially resting on the electrified back plate. We found individuals from the Flathead River in British Columbia (with the highest natural flow) failed at significantly higher U(burst) velocities than fish from the southern Albertan populations. However, there was no relationship between peak hydrologic flow from the natal river and U(burst) or U(slip). Further, U(burst) velocities decreased from 51.8 cm s(−1) (7.2 BL s(−1)) to 45.6 cm s(−1) (6.3 BL s(−1)) by the third consecutive test suggesting the use of anaerobic metabolism. U(slip) was not different between trials suggesting the use of aerobic metabolism in station-holding behaviours (U(slip)). Moreover, we found no significant differences in individuals from the altered North Milk River system. Finally, individual caudal morphological characteristics were related to both slip and failure velocities. Our study contributes to the conservation of Rocky Mountain Sculpin by providing the first documentation of swimming and station-holding abilities of this benthic fish. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5417056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54170562017-05-05 Comparative swimming and station-holding ability of the threatened Rocky Mountain Sculpin (Cottus sp.) from four hydrologically distinct rivers Veillard, Marie F. Ruppert, Jonathan L.W. Tierney, Keith Watkinson, Douglas A. Poesch, Mark Conserv Physiol Research Article Hydrologic alterations, such as dams, culverts or diversions, can introduce new selection pressures on freshwater fishes, where they are required to adapt to novel environmental conditions. Our study investigated how species adapt to natural and altered stream flow, where we use the threatened Rocky Mountain Sculpin (Cottus sp.) as a model organism. We compared the swimming and station-holding performance of Rocky Mountain Sculpin from four different hydrologic regimes in Alberta and British Columbia, including the North Milk River, a system that experiences increased flows from a large-scale diversion. We measured the slip (U(slip)) and failure (U(burst)) velocities over three constant acceleration test trials. U(slip) was defined as the point at which individuals required the addition of bursting or swimming to maintain position. U(burst) was defined as the point at which individuals were unable to hold position in the swimming chamber through swimming, bursting or holding techniques without fully or partially resting on the electrified back plate. We found individuals from the Flathead River in British Columbia (with the highest natural flow) failed at significantly higher U(burst) velocities than fish from the southern Albertan populations. However, there was no relationship between peak hydrologic flow from the natal river and U(burst) or U(slip). Further, U(burst) velocities decreased from 51.8 cm s(−1) (7.2 BL s(−1)) to 45.6 cm s(−1) (6.3 BL s(−1)) by the third consecutive test suggesting the use of anaerobic metabolism. U(slip) was not different between trials suggesting the use of aerobic metabolism in station-holding behaviours (U(slip)). Moreover, we found no significant differences in individuals from the altered North Milk River system. Finally, individual caudal morphological characteristics were related to both slip and failure velocities. Our study contributes to the conservation of Rocky Mountain Sculpin by providing the first documentation of swimming and station-holding abilities of this benthic fish. Oxford University Press 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5417056/ /pubmed/28480038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cox026 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Veillard, Marie F. Ruppert, Jonathan L.W. Tierney, Keith Watkinson, Douglas A. Poesch, Mark Comparative swimming and station-holding ability of the threatened Rocky Mountain Sculpin (Cottus sp.) from four hydrologically distinct rivers |
title | Comparative swimming and station-holding ability of the threatened Rocky Mountain Sculpin (Cottus sp.) from four hydrologically distinct rivers |
title_full | Comparative swimming and station-holding ability of the threatened Rocky Mountain Sculpin (Cottus sp.) from four hydrologically distinct rivers |
title_fullStr | Comparative swimming and station-holding ability of the threatened Rocky Mountain Sculpin (Cottus sp.) from four hydrologically distinct rivers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative swimming and station-holding ability of the threatened Rocky Mountain Sculpin (Cottus sp.) from four hydrologically distinct rivers |
title_short | Comparative swimming and station-holding ability of the threatened Rocky Mountain Sculpin (Cottus sp.) from four hydrologically distinct rivers |
title_sort | comparative swimming and station-holding ability of the threatened rocky mountain sculpin (cottus sp.) from four hydrologically distinct rivers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28480038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/conphys/cox026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veillardmarief comparativeswimmingandstationholdingabilityofthethreatenedrockymountainsculpincottusspfromfourhydrologicallydistinctrivers AT ruppertjonathanlw comparativeswimmingandstationholdingabilityofthethreatenedrockymountainsculpincottusspfromfourhydrologicallydistinctrivers AT tierneykeith comparativeswimmingandstationholdingabilityofthethreatenedrockymountainsculpincottusspfromfourhydrologicallydistinctrivers AT watkinsondouglasa comparativeswimmingandstationholdingabilityofthethreatenedrockymountainsculpincottusspfromfourhydrologicallydistinctrivers AT poeschmark comparativeswimmingandstationholdingabilityofthethreatenedrockymountainsculpincottusspfromfourhydrologicallydistinctrivers |