Cargando…

The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score: a risk stratification and outcome prediction tool

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to identify covariates associated with 28-day mortality in septic patients admitted to the emergency department and derive and validate a score that stratifies mortality risk utilizing parameters that are readily available. METHODS: Patients with an admission dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp, Hautmann, Oliver, Kofink, Daniel, Abdul Khalil, Alizan, Zainal Abidin, Imran, Loch, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26524675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000344
_version_ 1783233908143292416
author Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp
Hautmann, Oliver
Kofink, Daniel
Abdul Khalil, Alizan
Zainal Abidin, Imran
Loch, Alexander
author_facet Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp
Hautmann, Oliver
Kofink, Daniel
Abdul Khalil, Alizan
Zainal Abidin, Imran
Loch, Alexander
author_sort Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to identify covariates associated with 28-day mortality in septic patients admitted to the emergency department and derive and validate a score that stratifies mortality risk utilizing parameters that are readily available. METHODS: Patients with an admission diagnosis of suspected or confirmed infection and fulfilling at least two criteria for severe inflammatory response syndrome were included in this study. Patients’ characteristics, vital signs, and laboratory values were used to identify prognostic factors for mortality. A scoring system was derived and validated. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate. RESULTS: A total of 440 patients were included in the study. The 28-day hospital mortality rate was 32.4 and 25.2% for the derivation (293 patients) and validation (147 patients) sets, respectively. Factors associated with a higher mortality were immune-suppressed state (odds ratio 4.7; 95% confidence interval 2.0–11.4), systolic blood pressure on arrival less than 90 mmHg (3.8; 1.7–8.3), body temperature less than 36.0°C (4.1; 1.3–12.9), oxygen saturation less than 90% (2.3; 1.1–4.8), hematocrit less than 0.38 (3.1; 1.6–5.9), blood pH less than 7.35 (2.0; 1.04–3.9), lactate level more than 2.4 mmol/l (2.27; 1.2–4.2), and pneumonia as the source of infection (2.7; 1.5–5.0). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81 (0.75–0.86) in the derivation and 0.81 (0.73–0.90) in the validation set. The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score performed better (P=0.02) than the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score when applied to the complete study population with an area under the curve of 0.81 (0.76–0.85) as compared with 0.74 (0.70–0.79). CONCLUSION: The SPEED score predicts 28-day mortality in septic patients. It is simple and its predictive value is comparable to that of other scoring systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5417572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54175722017-05-10 The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score: a risk stratification and outcome prediction tool Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp Hautmann, Oliver Kofink, Daniel Abdul Khalil, Alizan Zainal Abidin, Imran Loch, Alexander Eur J Emerg Med Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to identify covariates associated with 28-day mortality in septic patients admitted to the emergency department and derive and validate a score that stratifies mortality risk utilizing parameters that are readily available. METHODS: Patients with an admission diagnosis of suspected or confirmed infection and fulfilling at least two criteria for severe inflammatory response syndrome were included in this study. Patients’ characteristics, vital signs, and laboratory values were used to identify prognostic factors for mortality. A scoring system was derived and validated. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality rate. RESULTS: A total of 440 patients were included in the study. The 28-day hospital mortality rate was 32.4 and 25.2% for the derivation (293 patients) and validation (147 patients) sets, respectively. Factors associated with a higher mortality were immune-suppressed state (odds ratio 4.7; 95% confidence interval 2.0–11.4), systolic blood pressure on arrival less than 90 mmHg (3.8; 1.7–8.3), body temperature less than 36.0°C (4.1; 1.3–12.9), oxygen saturation less than 90% (2.3; 1.1–4.8), hematocrit less than 0.38 (3.1; 1.6–5.9), blood pH less than 7.35 (2.0; 1.04–3.9), lactate level more than 2.4 mmol/l (2.27; 1.2–4.2), and pneumonia as the source of infection (2.7; 1.5–5.0). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.81 (0.75–0.86) in the derivation and 0.81 (0.73–0.90) in the validation set. The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score performed better (P=0.02) than the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score when applied to the complete study population with an area under the curve of 0.81 (0.76–0.85) as compared with 0.74 (0.70–0.79). CONCLUSION: The SPEED score predicts 28-day mortality in septic patients. It is simple and its predictive value is comparable to that of other scoring systems. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-06 2015-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5417572/ /pubmed/26524675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000344 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bewersdorf, Jan Philipp
Hautmann, Oliver
Kofink, Daniel
Abdul Khalil, Alizan
Zainal Abidin, Imran
Loch, Alexander
The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score: a risk stratification and outcome prediction tool
title The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score: a risk stratification and outcome prediction tool
title_full The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score: a risk stratification and outcome prediction tool
title_fullStr The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score: a risk stratification and outcome prediction tool
title_full_unstemmed The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score: a risk stratification and outcome prediction tool
title_short The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score: a risk stratification and outcome prediction tool
title_sort speed (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score: a risk stratification and outcome prediction tool
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26524675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000344
work_keys_str_mv AT bewersdorfjanphilipp thespeedsepsispatientevaluationintheemergencydepartmentscoreariskstratificationandoutcomepredictiontool
AT hautmannoliver thespeedsepsispatientevaluationintheemergencydepartmentscoreariskstratificationandoutcomepredictiontool
AT kofinkdaniel thespeedsepsispatientevaluationintheemergencydepartmentscoreariskstratificationandoutcomepredictiontool
AT abdulkhalilalizan thespeedsepsispatientevaluationintheemergencydepartmentscoreariskstratificationandoutcomepredictiontool
AT zainalabidinimran thespeedsepsispatientevaluationintheemergencydepartmentscoreariskstratificationandoutcomepredictiontool
AT lochalexander thespeedsepsispatientevaluationintheemergencydepartmentscoreariskstratificationandoutcomepredictiontool
AT bewersdorfjanphilipp speedsepsispatientevaluationintheemergencydepartmentscoreariskstratificationandoutcomepredictiontool
AT hautmannoliver speedsepsispatientevaluationintheemergencydepartmentscoreariskstratificationandoutcomepredictiontool
AT kofinkdaniel speedsepsispatientevaluationintheemergencydepartmentscoreariskstratificationandoutcomepredictiontool
AT abdulkhalilalizan speedsepsispatientevaluationintheemergencydepartmentscoreariskstratificationandoutcomepredictiontool
AT zainalabidinimran speedsepsispatientevaluationintheemergencydepartmentscoreariskstratificationandoutcomepredictiontool
AT lochalexander speedsepsispatientevaluationintheemergencydepartmentscoreariskstratificationandoutcomepredictiontool