Cargando…

Ultrasound Tomography Evaluation of Breast Density: A Comparison With Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound tomography (UST) is an emerging whole-breast 3-dimensional imaging technique that obtains quantitative tomograms of speed of sound of the entire breast. The imaged parameter is the speed of sound which is used as a surrogate measure of density at each voxel and holds promise a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Flynn, Elizabeth A.M., Fromageau, Jeremie, Ledger, Araminta E., Messa, Alessandro, D'Aquino, Ashley, Schoemaker, Minouk J., Schmidt, Maria, Duric, Neb, Swerdlow, Anthony J., Bamber, Jeffrey C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28121639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000347
_version_ 1783233910661971968
author O'Flynn, Elizabeth A.M.
Fromageau, Jeremie
Ledger, Araminta E.
Messa, Alessandro
D'Aquino, Ashley
Schoemaker, Minouk J.
Schmidt, Maria
Duric, Neb
Swerdlow, Anthony J.
Bamber, Jeffrey C.
author_facet O'Flynn, Elizabeth A.M.
Fromageau, Jeremie
Ledger, Araminta E.
Messa, Alessandro
D'Aquino, Ashley
Schoemaker, Minouk J.
Schmidt, Maria
Duric, Neb
Swerdlow, Anthony J.
Bamber, Jeffrey C.
author_sort O'Flynn, Elizabeth A.M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound tomography (UST) is an emerging whole-breast 3-dimensional imaging technique that obtains quantitative tomograms of speed of sound of the entire breast. The imaged parameter is the speed of sound which is used as a surrogate measure of density at each voxel and holds promise as a method to evaluate breast density without ionizing radiation. This study evaluated the technique of UST and compared whole-breast volume averaged speed of sound (VASS) with MR percent water content from noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three healthy female volunteers (median age, 40 years; range, 29–59 years) underwent bilateral breast UST and MRI using a 2-point Dixon technique. Reproducibility of VASS was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. Volume averaged speed of sound and MR percent water were evaluated and compared using Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation VASS measurement was 1463 ± 29 m s(−1) (range, 1434–1542 m s(−1)). There was high similarity between right (1464 ± 30 m s(−1)) and left (1462 ± 28 m s(−1)) breasts (P = 0.113) (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.98). Mean MR percent water content was 35.7% ± 14.7% (range, 13.2%–75.3%), with small but significant differences between right and left breasts (36.3% ± 14.9% and 35.1% ± 14.7%, respectively; P = 0.004). There was a very strong correlation between VASS and MR percent water density (r(2) = 0.96, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound tomography holds promise as a reliable and reproducible 3-dimensional technique to provide a surrogate measure of breast density and correlates strongly with MR percent water content.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5417582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54175822017-05-10 Ultrasound Tomography Evaluation of Breast Density: A Comparison With Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging O'Flynn, Elizabeth A.M. Fromageau, Jeremie Ledger, Araminta E. Messa, Alessandro D'Aquino, Ashley Schoemaker, Minouk J. Schmidt, Maria Duric, Neb Swerdlow, Anthony J. Bamber, Jeffrey C. Invest Radiol Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound tomography (UST) is an emerging whole-breast 3-dimensional imaging technique that obtains quantitative tomograms of speed of sound of the entire breast. The imaged parameter is the speed of sound which is used as a surrogate measure of density at each voxel and holds promise as a method to evaluate breast density without ionizing radiation. This study evaluated the technique of UST and compared whole-breast volume averaged speed of sound (VASS) with MR percent water content from noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-three healthy female volunteers (median age, 40 years; range, 29–59 years) underwent bilateral breast UST and MRI using a 2-point Dixon technique. Reproducibility of VASS was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. Volume averaged speed of sound and MR percent water were evaluated and compared using Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation VASS measurement was 1463 ± 29 m s(−1) (range, 1434–1542 m s(−1)). There was high similarity between right (1464 ± 30 m s(−1)) and left (1462 ± 28 m s(−1)) breasts (P = 0.113) (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.98). Mean MR percent water content was 35.7% ± 14.7% (range, 13.2%–75.3%), with small but significant differences between right and left breasts (36.3% ± 14.9% and 35.1% ± 14.7%, respectively; P = 0.004). There was a very strong correlation between VASS and MR percent water density (r(2) = 0.96, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound tomography holds promise as a reliable and reproducible 3-dimensional technique to provide a surrogate measure of breast density and correlates strongly with MR percent water content. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-06 2017-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5417582/ /pubmed/28121639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000347 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
O'Flynn, Elizabeth A.M.
Fromageau, Jeremie
Ledger, Araminta E.
Messa, Alessandro
D'Aquino, Ashley
Schoemaker, Minouk J.
Schmidt, Maria
Duric, Neb
Swerdlow, Anthony J.
Bamber, Jeffrey C.
Ultrasound Tomography Evaluation of Breast Density: A Comparison With Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Ultrasound Tomography Evaluation of Breast Density: A Comparison With Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Ultrasound Tomography Evaluation of Breast Density: A Comparison With Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Ultrasound Tomography Evaluation of Breast Density: A Comparison With Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound Tomography Evaluation of Breast Density: A Comparison With Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Ultrasound Tomography Evaluation of Breast Density: A Comparison With Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort ultrasound tomography evaluation of breast density: a comparison with noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28121639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000347
work_keys_str_mv AT oflynnelizabetham ultrasoundtomographyevaluationofbreastdensityacomparisonwithnoncontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT fromageaujeremie ultrasoundtomographyevaluationofbreastdensityacomparisonwithnoncontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT ledgeraramintae ultrasoundtomographyevaluationofbreastdensityacomparisonwithnoncontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT messaalessandro ultrasoundtomographyevaluationofbreastdensityacomparisonwithnoncontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT daquinoashley ultrasoundtomographyevaluationofbreastdensityacomparisonwithnoncontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT schoemakerminoukj ultrasoundtomographyevaluationofbreastdensityacomparisonwithnoncontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT schmidtmaria ultrasoundtomographyevaluationofbreastdensityacomparisonwithnoncontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT duricneb ultrasoundtomographyevaluationofbreastdensityacomparisonwithnoncontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT swerdlowanthonyj ultrasoundtomographyevaluationofbreastdensityacomparisonwithnoncontrastmagneticresonanceimaging
AT bamberjeffreyc ultrasoundtomographyevaluationofbreastdensityacomparisonwithnoncontrastmagneticresonanceimaging