Cargando…

Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of antiangiogenic agents (AAs) in cancer treatment has increased because they offer survival benefit in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Given their potential to cause gastrointestinal (GI) perforation and bleeding, it is currently recommended that AAs be held for 28...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kachaamy, Toufic, Gupta, Digant, Edwin, Persis, Vashi, Pankaj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176899
_version_ 1783233914540654592
author Kachaamy, Toufic
Gupta, Digant
Edwin, Persis
Vashi, Pankaj
author_facet Kachaamy, Toufic
Gupta, Digant
Edwin, Persis
Vashi, Pankaj
author_sort Kachaamy, Toufic
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of antiangiogenic agents (AAs) in cancer treatment has increased because they offer survival benefit in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Given their potential to cause gastrointestinal (GI) perforation and bleeding, it is currently recommended that AAs be held for 28 days before and after surgery. However, there are no specific guidelines which address their use around endoscopic procedures because data regarding the safety of endoscopy in cancer patients while on AAs is scarce despite the fact that these patients often require endoscopy. This study investigated the safety of endoscopy in cancer patients receiving AAs. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study of a consecutive case series of 445 cancer patients undergoing endoscopy within 31 days of administration of AAs at 5 specialized cancer centers between April 2008 and August 2014. Endoscopies were classified into two different categories based on the risk of GI bleeding and perforation: low and high. The primary outcome measures were procedure-related adverse events (AEs) and death within 30 days of endoscopy. The severity of AEs was classified according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0. The incidence of AEs and mortality was calculated using the total number of patients as the denominator. RESULTS: 445 cancer patients with a mean age of 54 years underwent a total of 545 endoscopies. Median time duration from AAs to endoscopy was 11 days. Of 545 endoscopic procedures, 398 (73%) were low-risk and 147 (27%) were high-risk. There were 3 procedure-related AEs: esophageal perforation (grade 3) two days after an EGD, pancreatitis (grade 5) a day after failed ERCP, and bleeding from the gastrostomy site (grade 1) two days after an EGD. Of 445 patients, 29 (6.5%) died within 30 days of the procedure with no deaths deemed procedure-related. The most common causes of death were terminal cancer (n = 10), hepatic decompensation (n = 5) and sepsis (n = 4). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the rate of endoscopy-related AEs in patients on AAs appears to be low when performed in specialized cancer centers. However, future prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5417598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54175982017-05-14 Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study Kachaamy, Toufic Gupta, Digant Edwin, Persis Vashi, Pankaj PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of antiangiogenic agents (AAs) in cancer treatment has increased because they offer survival benefit in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Given their potential to cause gastrointestinal (GI) perforation and bleeding, it is currently recommended that AAs be held for 28 days before and after surgery. However, there are no specific guidelines which address their use around endoscopic procedures because data regarding the safety of endoscopy in cancer patients while on AAs is scarce despite the fact that these patients often require endoscopy. This study investigated the safety of endoscopy in cancer patients receiving AAs. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study of a consecutive case series of 445 cancer patients undergoing endoscopy within 31 days of administration of AAs at 5 specialized cancer centers between April 2008 and August 2014. Endoscopies were classified into two different categories based on the risk of GI bleeding and perforation: low and high. The primary outcome measures were procedure-related adverse events (AEs) and death within 30 days of endoscopy. The severity of AEs was classified according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0. The incidence of AEs and mortality was calculated using the total number of patients as the denominator. RESULTS: 445 cancer patients with a mean age of 54 years underwent a total of 545 endoscopies. Median time duration from AAs to endoscopy was 11 days. Of 545 endoscopic procedures, 398 (73%) were low-risk and 147 (27%) were high-risk. There were 3 procedure-related AEs: esophageal perforation (grade 3) two days after an EGD, pancreatitis (grade 5) a day after failed ERCP, and bleeding from the gastrostomy site (grade 1) two days after an EGD. Of 445 patients, 29 (6.5%) died within 30 days of the procedure with no deaths deemed procedure-related. The most common causes of death were terminal cancer (n = 10), hepatic decompensation (n = 5) and sepsis (n = 4). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the rate of endoscopy-related AEs in patients on AAs appears to be low when performed in specialized cancer centers. However, future prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding. Public Library of Science 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5417598/ /pubmed/28472195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176899 Text en © 2017 Kachaamy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kachaamy, Toufic
Gupta, Digant
Edwin, Persis
Vashi, Pankaj
Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study
title Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study
title_full Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study
title_fullStr Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study
title_full_unstemmed Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study
title_short Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study
title_sort safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: a retrospective multicenter outcomes study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176899
work_keys_str_mv AT kachaamytoufic safetyofendoscopyincancerpatientsonantiangiogenicagentsaretrospectivemulticenteroutcomesstudy
AT guptadigant safetyofendoscopyincancerpatientsonantiangiogenicagentsaretrospectivemulticenteroutcomesstudy
AT edwinpersis safetyofendoscopyincancerpatientsonantiangiogenicagentsaretrospectivemulticenteroutcomesstudy
AT vashipankaj safetyofendoscopyincancerpatientsonantiangiogenicagentsaretrospectivemulticenteroutcomesstudy