Cargando…
Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of antiangiogenic agents (AAs) in cancer treatment has increased because they offer survival benefit in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Given their potential to cause gastrointestinal (GI) perforation and bleeding, it is currently recommended that AAs be held for 28...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176899 |
_version_ | 1783233914540654592 |
---|---|
author | Kachaamy, Toufic Gupta, Digant Edwin, Persis Vashi, Pankaj |
author_facet | Kachaamy, Toufic Gupta, Digant Edwin, Persis Vashi, Pankaj |
author_sort | Kachaamy, Toufic |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of antiangiogenic agents (AAs) in cancer treatment has increased because they offer survival benefit in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Given their potential to cause gastrointestinal (GI) perforation and bleeding, it is currently recommended that AAs be held for 28 days before and after surgery. However, there are no specific guidelines which address their use around endoscopic procedures because data regarding the safety of endoscopy in cancer patients while on AAs is scarce despite the fact that these patients often require endoscopy. This study investigated the safety of endoscopy in cancer patients receiving AAs. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study of a consecutive case series of 445 cancer patients undergoing endoscopy within 31 days of administration of AAs at 5 specialized cancer centers between April 2008 and August 2014. Endoscopies were classified into two different categories based on the risk of GI bleeding and perforation: low and high. The primary outcome measures were procedure-related adverse events (AEs) and death within 30 days of endoscopy. The severity of AEs was classified according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0. The incidence of AEs and mortality was calculated using the total number of patients as the denominator. RESULTS: 445 cancer patients with a mean age of 54 years underwent a total of 545 endoscopies. Median time duration from AAs to endoscopy was 11 days. Of 545 endoscopic procedures, 398 (73%) were low-risk and 147 (27%) were high-risk. There were 3 procedure-related AEs: esophageal perforation (grade 3) two days after an EGD, pancreatitis (grade 5) a day after failed ERCP, and bleeding from the gastrostomy site (grade 1) two days after an EGD. Of 445 patients, 29 (6.5%) died within 30 days of the procedure with no deaths deemed procedure-related. The most common causes of death were terminal cancer (n = 10), hepatic decompensation (n = 5) and sepsis (n = 4). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the rate of endoscopy-related AEs in patients on AAs appears to be low when performed in specialized cancer centers. However, future prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5417598 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54175982017-05-14 Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study Kachaamy, Toufic Gupta, Digant Edwin, Persis Vashi, Pankaj PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of antiangiogenic agents (AAs) in cancer treatment has increased because they offer survival benefit in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Given their potential to cause gastrointestinal (GI) perforation and bleeding, it is currently recommended that AAs be held for 28 days before and after surgery. However, there are no specific guidelines which address their use around endoscopic procedures because data regarding the safety of endoscopy in cancer patients while on AAs is scarce despite the fact that these patients often require endoscopy. This study investigated the safety of endoscopy in cancer patients receiving AAs. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicenter study of a consecutive case series of 445 cancer patients undergoing endoscopy within 31 days of administration of AAs at 5 specialized cancer centers between April 2008 and August 2014. Endoscopies were classified into two different categories based on the risk of GI bleeding and perforation: low and high. The primary outcome measures were procedure-related adverse events (AEs) and death within 30 days of endoscopy. The severity of AEs was classified according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0. The incidence of AEs and mortality was calculated using the total number of patients as the denominator. RESULTS: 445 cancer patients with a mean age of 54 years underwent a total of 545 endoscopies. Median time duration from AAs to endoscopy was 11 days. Of 545 endoscopic procedures, 398 (73%) were low-risk and 147 (27%) were high-risk. There were 3 procedure-related AEs: esophageal perforation (grade 3) two days after an EGD, pancreatitis (grade 5) a day after failed ERCP, and bleeding from the gastrostomy site (grade 1) two days after an EGD. Of 445 patients, 29 (6.5%) died within 30 days of the procedure with no deaths deemed procedure-related. The most common causes of death were terminal cancer (n = 10), hepatic decompensation (n = 5) and sepsis (n = 4). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, the rate of endoscopy-related AEs in patients on AAs appears to be low when performed in specialized cancer centers. However, future prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding. Public Library of Science 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5417598/ /pubmed/28472195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176899 Text en © 2017 Kachaamy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kachaamy, Toufic Gupta, Digant Edwin, Persis Vashi, Pankaj Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study |
title | Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study |
title_full | Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study |
title_fullStr | Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study |
title_short | Safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: A retrospective multicenter outcomes study |
title_sort | safety of endoscopy in cancer patients on antiangiogenic agents: a retrospective multicenter outcomes study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5417598/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176899 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kachaamytoufic safetyofendoscopyincancerpatientsonantiangiogenicagentsaretrospectivemulticenteroutcomesstudy AT guptadigant safetyofendoscopyincancerpatientsonantiangiogenicagentsaretrospectivemulticenteroutcomesstudy AT edwinpersis safetyofendoscopyincancerpatientsonantiangiogenicagentsaretrospectivemulticenteroutcomesstudy AT vashipankaj safetyofendoscopyincancerpatientsonantiangiogenicagentsaretrospectivemulticenteroutcomesstudy |