Cargando…

Complete Locked-in and Locked-in Patients: Command Following Assessment and Communication with Vibro-Tactile P300 and Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Tools

Many patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS) or complete locked-in syndrome (CLIS) also need brain-computer interface (BCI) platforms that do not rely on visual stimuli and are easy to use. We investigate command following and communication functions of mindBEAGLE with 9 LIS, 3 CLIS patients and thre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guger, Christoph, Spataro, Rossella, Allison, Brendan Z., Heilinger, Alexander, Ortner, Rupert, Cho, Woosang, La Bella, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00251
_version_ 1783234059525160960
author Guger, Christoph
Spataro, Rossella
Allison, Brendan Z.
Heilinger, Alexander
Ortner, Rupert
Cho, Woosang
La Bella, Vincenzo
author_facet Guger, Christoph
Spataro, Rossella
Allison, Brendan Z.
Heilinger, Alexander
Ortner, Rupert
Cho, Woosang
La Bella, Vincenzo
author_sort Guger, Christoph
collection PubMed
description Many patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS) or complete locked-in syndrome (CLIS) also need brain-computer interface (BCI) platforms that do not rely on visual stimuli and are easy to use. We investigate command following and communication functions of mindBEAGLE with 9 LIS, 3 CLIS patients and three healthy controls. This tests were done with vibro-tactile stimulation with 2 or 3 stimulators (VT2 and VT3 mode) and with motor imagery (MI) paradigms. In VT2 the stimulators are fixed on the left and right wrist and the participant has the task to count the stimuli on the target hand in order to elicit a P300 response. In VT3 mode an additional stimulator is placed as a distractor on the shoulder and the participant is counting stimuli either on the right or left hand. In motor imagery mode the participant is instructed to imagine left or right hand movement. VT3 and MI also allow the participant to answer yes and no questions. Healthy controls achieved a mean assessment accuracy of 100% in VT2, 93% in VT3, and 73% in MI modes. They were able to communicate with VT3 (86.7%) and MI (83.3%) after 2 training runs. The patients achieved a mean accuracy of 76.6% in VT2, 63.1% in VT3, and 58.2% in MI modes after 1–2 training runs. 9 out of 12 LIS patients could communicate by using the vibro-tactile P300 paradigms (answered on average 8 out of 10 questions correctly) and 3 out of 12 could communicate with the motor imagery paradigm (answered correctly 4,7 out of 5 questions). 2 out of the 3 CLIS patients could use the system to communicate with VT3 (90 and 70% accuracy). The results show that paradigms based on non-visual evoked potentials and motor imagery can be effective for these users. It is also the first study that showed EEG-based BCI communication with CLIS patients and was able to bring 9 out of 12 patients to communicate with higher accuracies than reported before. More importantly this was achieved within less than 15–20 min.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5418541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54185412017-05-19 Complete Locked-in and Locked-in Patients: Command Following Assessment and Communication with Vibro-Tactile P300 and Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Tools Guger, Christoph Spataro, Rossella Allison, Brendan Z. Heilinger, Alexander Ortner, Rupert Cho, Woosang La Bella, Vincenzo Front Neurosci Neuroscience Many patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS) or complete locked-in syndrome (CLIS) also need brain-computer interface (BCI) platforms that do not rely on visual stimuli and are easy to use. We investigate command following and communication functions of mindBEAGLE with 9 LIS, 3 CLIS patients and three healthy controls. This tests were done with vibro-tactile stimulation with 2 or 3 stimulators (VT2 and VT3 mode) and with motor imagery (MI) paradigms. In VT2 the stimulators are fixed on the left and right wrist and the participant has the task to count the stimuli on the target hand in order to elicit a P300 response. In VT3 mode an additional stimulator is placed as a distractor on the shoulder and the participant is counting stimuli either on the right or left hand. In motor imagery mode the participant is instructed to imagine left or right hand movement. VT3 and MI also allow the participant to answer yes and no questions. Healthy controls achieved a mean assessment accuracy of 100% in VT2, 93% in VT3, and 73% in MI modes. They were able to communicate with VT3 (86.7%) and MI (83.3%) after 2 training runs. The patients achieved a mean accuracy of 76.6% in VT2, 63.1% in VT3, and 58.2% in MI modes after 1–2 training runs. 9 out of 12 LIS patients could communicate by using the vibro-tactile P300 paradigms (answered on average 8 out of 10 questions correctly) and 3 out of 12 could communicate with the motor imagery paradigm (answered correctly 4,7 out of 5 questions). 2 out of the 3 CLIS patients could use the system to communicate with VT3 (90 and 70% accuracy). The results show that paradigms based on non-visual evoked potentials and motor imagery can be effective for these users. It is also the first study that showed EEG-based BCI communication with CLIS patients and was able to bring 9 out of 12 patients to communicate with higher accuracies than reported before. More importantly this was achieved within less than 15–20 min. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5418541/ /pubmed/28529473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00251 Text en Copyright © 2017 Guger, Spataro, Allison, Heilinger, Ortner, Cho and La Bella. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Guger, Christoph
Spataro, Rossella
Allison, Brendan Z.
Heilinger, Alexander
Ortner, Rupert
Cho, Woosang
La Bella, Vincenzo
Complete Locked-in and Locked-in Patients: Command Following Assessment and Communication with Vibro-Tactile P300 and Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Tools
title Complete Locked-in and Locked-in Patients: Command Following Assessment and Communication with Vibro-Tactile P300 and Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Tools
title_full Complete Locked-in and Locked-in Patients: Command Following Assessment and Communication with Vibro-Tactile P300 and Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Tools
title_fullStr Complete Locked-in and Locked-in Patients: Command Following Assessment and Communication with Vibro-Tactile P300 and Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Tools
title_full_unstemmed Complete Locked-in and Locked-in Patients: Command Following Assessment and Communication with Vibro-Tactile P300 and Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Tools
title_short Complete Locked-in and Locked-in Patients: Command Following Assessment and Communication with Vibro-Tactile P300 and Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Tools
title_sort complete locked-in and locked-in patients: command following assessment and communication with vibro-tactile p300 and motor imagery brain-computer interface tools
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00251
work_keys_str_mv AT gugerchristoph completelockedinandlockedinpatientscommandfollowingassessmentandcommunicationwithvibrotactilep300andmotorimagerybraincomputerinterfacetools
AT spatarorossella completelockedinandlockedinpatientscommandfollowingassessmentandcommunicationwithvibrotactilep300andmotorimagerybraincomputerinterfacetools
AT allisonbrendanz completelockedinandlockedinpatientscommandfollowingassessmentandcommunicationwithvibrotactilep300andmotorimagerybraincomputerinterfacetools
AT heilingeralexander completelockedinandlockedinpatientscommandfollowingassessmentandcommunicationwithvibrotactilep300andmotorimagerybraincomputerinterfacetools
AT ortnerrupert completelockedinandlockedinpatientscommandfollowingassessmentandcommunicationwithvibrotactilep300andmotorimagerybraincomputerinterfacetools
AT chowoosang completelockedinandlockedinpatientscommandfollowingassessmentandcommunicationwithvibrotactilep300andmotorimagerybraincomputerinterfacetools
AT labellavincenzo completelockedinandlockedinpatientscommandfollowingassessmentandcommunicationwithvibrotactilep300andmotorimagerybraincomputerinterfacetools