Cargando…

Similarity in viral and host promoters couples viral reactivation with host cell migration

Viral–host interactomes map the complex architecture of an evolved arms race during host cell invasion. mRNA and protein interactomes reveal elaborate targeting schemes, yet evidence is lacking for genetic coupling that results in the co-regulation of promoters. Here we compare viral and human promo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bohn-Wippert, Kathrin, Tevonian, Erin N., Megaridis, Melina R., Dar, Roy D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28462923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15006
_version_ 1783234068333199360
author Bohn-Wippert, Kathrin
Tevonian, Erin N.
Megaridis, Melina R.
Dar, Roy D.
author_facet Bohn-Wippert, Kathrin
Tevonian, Erin N.
Megaridis, Melina R.
Dar, Roy D.
author_sort Bohn-Wippert, Kathrin
collection PubMed
description Viral–host interactomes map the complex architecture of an evolved arms race during host cell invasion. mRNA and protein interactomes reveal elaborate targeting schemes, yet evidence is lacking for genetic coupling that results in the co-regulation of promoters. Here we compare viral and human promoter sequences and expression to test whether genetic coupling exists and investigate its phenotypic consequences. We show that viral–host co-evolution is imprinted within promoter gene sequences before transcript or protein interactions. Co-regulation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and human C-X-C chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4) facilitates migration of infected cells. Upon infection, HIV can actively replicate or remain dormant. Migrating infected cells reactivate from dormancy more than non-migrating cells and exhibit differential migration–reactivation responses to drugs. Cells producing virus pose a risk for reinitiating infection within niches inaccessible to drugs, and tuning viral control of migration and reactivation improves strategies to eliminate latent HIV. Viral–host genetic coupling establishes a mechanism for synchronizing transcription and guiding potential therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5418578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54185782017-07-06 Similarity in viral and host promoters couples viral reactivation with host cell migration Bohn-Wippert, Kathrin Tevonian, Erin N. Megaridis, Melina R. Dar, Roy D. Nat Commun Article Viral–host interactomes map the complex architecture of an evolved arms race during host cell invasion. mRNA and protein interactomes reveal elaborate targeting schemes, yet evidence is lacking for genetic coupling that results in the co-regulation of promoters. Here we compare viral and human promoter sequences and expression to test whether genetic coupling exists and investigate its phenotypic consequences. We show that viral–host co-evolution is imprinted within promoter gene sequences before transcript or protein interactions. Co-regulation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and human C-X-C chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4) facilitates migration of infected cells. Upon infection, HIV can actively replicate or remain dormant. Migrating infected cells reactivate from dormancy more than non-migrating cells and exhibit differential migration–reactivation responses to drugs. Cells producing virus pose a risk for reinitiating infection within niches inaccessible to drugs, and tuning viral control of migration and reactivation improves strategies to eliminate latent HIV. Viral–host genetic coupling establishes a mechanism for synchronizing transcription and guiding potential therapies. Nature Publishing Group 2017-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5418578/ /pubmed/28462923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15006 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Bohn-Wippert, Kathrin
Tevonian, Erin N.
Megaridis, Melina R.
Dar, Roy D.
Similarity in viral and host promoters couples viral reactivation with host cell migration
title Similarity in viral and host promoters couples viral reactivation with host cell migration
title_full Similarity in viral and host promoters couples viral reactivation with host cell migration
title_fullStr Similarity in viral and host promoters couples viral reactivation with host cell migration
title_full_unstemmed Similarity in viral and host promoters couples viral reactivation with host cell migration
title_short Similarity in viral and host promoters couples viral reactivation with host cell migration
title_sort similarity in viral and host promoters couples viral reactivation with host cell migration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28462923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15006
work_keys_str_mv AT bohnwippertkathrin similarityinviralandhostpromoterscouplesviralreactivationwithhostcellmigration
AT tevonianerinn similarityinviralandhostpromoterscouplesviralreactivationwithhostcellmigration
AT megaridismelinar similarityinviralandhostpromoterscouplesviralreactivationwithhostcellmigration
AT darroyd similarityinviralandhostpromoterscouplesviralreactivationwithhostcellmigration