Cargando…
“They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic
BACKGROUND: High quality sexual health services are needed to improve both individual and public health outcomes. This study set out to explore what is important to patients who visit a sexual health clinic, and examine their understanding of standard survey questions, in order to inform the collect...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2264-6 |
_version_ | 1783234096521019392 |
---|---|
author | Howarth, Alison R. Day, Sophie Greene, Linda Ward, Helen |
author_facet | Howarth, Alison R. Day, Sophie Greene, Linda Ward, Helen |
author_sort | Howarth, Alison R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High quality sexual health services are needed to improve both individual and public health outcomes. This study set out to explore what is important to patients who visit a sexual health clinic, and examine their understanding of standard survey questions, in order to inform the collection and interpretation of patient experience data that are used to improve services. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, qualitative study. In the first part of the interview, we used “discovery interviews” to explore patients’ experiences of attending a central London walk-in sexual health clinic. In the second part, we asked patients how they would respond to eight standard patient experience survey questions and to provide an explanation for each of their responses. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data. RESULTS: We interviewed seventeen participants (nine women, eight men) of different ethnicities and backgrounds. All interviewees were positive about their experience. They described how staff had made them feel “comfortable”, and talked about how staff spent time, listened and did not rush them, despite being a very busy clinic. In response to the survey questions, fourteen patients rated their as care excellent or very good overall. However, survey questions were interpreted in different ways and were not always easily understood. CONCLUSIONS: The open-ended “discovery interviews” provided new insights into aspects of care that were most valued or could improve. Standard patient experience questions provide a rating but little elucidation of the experiences that lie behind patients’ responses. They do not always measure aspects of care valued by patients or identify areas for improvement. They are not uniformly understood and necessarily collapse a wide range of experiences and views into categories that may seem inappropriate. Qualitative methods have a key role in measuring patient experience and involving patients in service improvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5418717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54187172017-05-08 “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic Howarth, Alison R. Day, Sophie Greene, Linda Ward, Helen BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: High quality sexual health services are needed to improve both individual and public health outcomes. This study set out to explore what is important to patients who visit a sexual health clinic, and examine their understanding of standard survey questions, in order to inform the collection and interpretation of patient experience data that are used to improve services. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, qualitative study. In the first part of the interview, we used “discovery interviews” to explore patients’ experiences of attending a central London walk-in sexual health clinic. In the second part, we asked patients how they would respond to eight standard patient experience survey questions and to provide an explanation for each of their responses. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data. RESULTS: We interviewed seventeen participants (nine women, eight men) of different ethnicities and backgrounds. All interviewees were positive about their experience. They described how staff had made them feel “comfortable”, and talked about how staff spent time, listened and did not rush them, despite being a very busy clinic. In response to the survey questions, fourteen patients rated their as care excellent or very good overall. However, survey questions were interpreted in different ways and were not always easily understood. CONCLUSIONS: The open-ended “discovery interviews” provided new insights into aspects of care that were most valued or could improve. Standard patient experience questions provide a rating but little elucidation of the experiences that lie behind patients’ responses. They do not always measure aspects of care valued by patients or identify areas for improvement. They are not uniformly understood and necessarily collapse a wide range of experiences and views into categories that may seem inappropriate. Qualitative methods have a key role in measuring patient experience and involving patients in service improvement. BioMed Central 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5418717/ /pubmed/28476173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2264-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Howarth, Alison R. Day, Sophie Greene, Linda Ward, Helen “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic |
title | “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic |
title_full | “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic |
title_fullStr | “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic |
title_full_unstemmed | “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic |
title_short | “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic |
title_sort | “they made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2264-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT howarthalisonr theymademefeelcomfortableacomparisonofmethodstomeasurepatientexperienceinasexualhealthclinic AT daysophie theymademefeelcomfortableacomparisonofmethodstomeasurepatientexperienceinasexualhealthclinic AT greenelinda theymademefeelcomfortableacomparisonofmethodstomeasurepatientexperienceinasexualhealthclinic AT wardhelen theymademefeelcomfortableacomparisonofmethodstomeasurepatientexperienceinasexualhealthclinic |