Cargando…

“They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic

BACKGROUND: High quality sexual health services are needed to improve both individual and public health outcomes. This study set out to explore what is important to patients who visit a sexual health clinic, and examine their understanding of standard survey questions, in order to inform the collect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howarth, Alison R., Day, Sophie, Greene, Linda, Ward, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2264-6
_version_ 1783234096521019392
author Howarth, Alison R.
Day, Sophie
Greene, Linda
Ward, Helen
author_facet Howarth, Alison R.
Day, Sophie
Greene, Linda
Ward, Helen
author_sort Howarth, Alison R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High quality sexual health services are needed to improve both individual and public health outcomes. This study set out to explore what is important to patients who visit a sexual health clinic, and examine their understanding of standard survey questions, in order to inform the collection and interpretation of patient experience data that are used to improve services. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, qualitative study. In the first part of the interview, we used “discovery interviews” to explore patients’ experiences of attending a central London walk-in sexual health clinic. In the second part, we asked patients how they would respond to eight standard patient experience survey questions and to provide an explanation for each of their responses. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data. RESULTS: We interviewed seventeen participants (nine women, eight men) of different ethnicities and backgrounds. All interviewees were positive about their experience. They described how staff had made them feel “comfortable”, and talked about how staff spent time, listened and did not rush them, despite being a very busy clinic. In response to the survey questions, fourteen patients rated their as care excellent or very good overall. However, survey questions were interpreted in different ways and were not always easily understood. CONCLUSIONS: The open-ended “discovery interviews” provided new insights into aspects of care that were most valued or could improve. Standard patient experience questions provide a rating but little elucidation of the experiences that lie behind patients’ responses. They do not always measure aspects of care valued by patients or identify areas for improvement. They are not uniformly understood and necessarily collapse a wide range of experiences and views into categories that may seem inappropriate. Qualitative methods have a key role in measuring patient experience and involving patients in service improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5418717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54187172017-05-08 “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic Howarth, Alison R. Day, Sophie Greene, Linda Ward, Helen BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: High quality sexual health services are needed to improve both individual and public health outcomes. This study set out to explore what is important to patients who visit a sexual health clinic, and examine their understanding of standard survey questions, in order to inform the collection and interpretation of patient experience data that are used to improve services. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, qualitative study. In the first part of the interview, we used “discovery interviews” to explore patients’ experiences of attending a central London walk-in sexual health clinic. In the second part, we asked patients how they would respond to eight standard patient experience survey questions and to provide an explanation for each of their responses. We conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data. RESULTS: We interviewed seventeen participants (nine women, eight men) of different ethnicities and backgrounds. All interviewees were positive about their experience. They described how staff had made them feel “comfortable”, and talked about how staff spent time, listened and did not rush them, despite being a very busy clinic. In response to the survey questions, fourteen patients rated their as care excellent or very good overall. However, survey questions were interpreted in different ways and were not always easily understood. CONCLUSIONS: The open-ended “discovery interviews” provided new insights into aspects of care that were most valued or could improve. Standard patient experience questions provide a rating but little elucidation of the experiences that lie behind patients’ responses. They do not always measure aspects of care valued by patients or identify areas for improvement. They are not uniformly understood and necessarily collapse a wide range of experiences and views into categories that may seem inappropriate. Qualitative methods have a key role in measuring patient experience and involving patients in service improvement. BioMed Central 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5418717/ /pubmed/28476173 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2264-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Howarth, Alison R.
Day, Sophie
Greene, Linda
Ward, Helen
“They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic
title “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic
title_full “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic
title_fullStr “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic
title_full_unstemmed “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic
title_short “They made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic
title_sort “they made me feel comfortable”: a comparison of methods to measure patient experience in a sexual health clinic
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476173
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2264-6
work_keys_str_mv AT howarthalisonr theymademefeelcomfortableacomparisonofmethodstomeasurepatientexperienceinasexualhealthclinic
AT daysophie theymademefeelcomfortableacomparisonofmethodstomeasurepatientexperienceinasexualhealthclinic
AT greenelinda theymademefeelcomfortableacomparisonofmethodstomeasurepatientexperienceinasexualhealthclinic
AT wardhelen theymademefeelcomfortableacomparisonofmethodstomeasurepatientexperienceinasexualhealthclinic