Cargando…
Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Comparative neonatal outcomes with respect to singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-state embryo transfers are controversial with respect to which method is superior. Many studies have yielded contradictory results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-017-0255-4 |
_version_ | 1783234108370976768 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Xingling Du, Mingze Guan, Yichun Wang, Bijun Zhang, Junwei Liu, Zihua |
author_facet | Wang, Xingling Du, Mingze Guan, Yichun Wang, Bijun Zhang, Junwei Liu, Zihua |
author_sort | Wang, Xingling |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Comparative neonatal outcomes with respect to singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-state embryo transfers are controversial with respect to which method is superior. Many studies have yielded contradictory results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the purpose of comparing neonatal outcomes in single births following IVF/ICSI. METHODS: We searched the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CCTR) databases until October 2016. Studies and trials that contained neonatal outcomes for singleton births were included. Data were extracted in 2 × 2 tables. The analysis was performed using Rev Man 5.1 software. Risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences, with 95% confidence intervals, were calculated to assess the results of each outcome. Subgroups were applied in all outcomes. Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) checklists were used to assess the quality of the referenced studies. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the criteria in this meta-analysis. There was a high risk of preterm birth after blastocyst embryo transfer versus the risk after cleavage-stage transfer (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01–1.22). For the “only fresh” subgroup, the outcome was coincident (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06–1.27). For the “fresh and frozen” and “only frozen” subgroups, there were no differences. Patients who received fresh blastocyst embryo transfers had a high risk of very preterm births (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02–1.31). Finally, cleavage-stage embryo transfers were associated with a high risk of infants who were small for gestational age (0.83, 95% CI: 0.76–0.92) and a low risk of those who were large for gestation age (1.14, 95% CI: 1.04–1.25). CONCLUSIONS: The risks of preterm and very preterm births increased after fresh blastocyst transfers versus the risks after fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers. However, in frozen embryo transfers, there were no differences. Blastocyst embryo transfers resulted in high risks of infants who were large for gestational age, and cleavage-stage embryo transfers resulted in high risks of infants who were small for gestational age. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5418763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54187632017-05-08 Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Xingling Du, Mingze Guan, Yichun Wang, Bijun Zhang, Junwei Liu, Zihua Reprod Biol Endocrinol Review BACKGROUND: Comparative neonatal outcomes with respect to singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-state embryo transfers are controversial with respect to which method is superior. Many studies have yielded contradictory results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the purpose of comparing neonatal outcomes in single births following IVF/ICSI. METHODS: We searched the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CCTR) databases until October 2016. Studies and trials that contained neonatal outcomes for singleton births were included. Data were extracted in 2 × 2 tables. The analysis was performed using Rev Man 5.1 software. Risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences, with 95% confidence intervals, were calculated to assess the results of each outcome. Subgroups were applied in all outcomes. Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) checklists were used to assess the quality of the referenced studies. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the criteria in this meta-analysis. There was a high risk of preterm birth after blastocyst embryo transfer versus the risk after cleavage-stage transfer (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01–1.22). For the “only fresh” subgroup, the outcome was coincident (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06–1.27). For the “fresh and frozen” and “only frozen” subgroups, there were no differences. Patients who received fresh blastocyst embryo transfers had a high risk of very preterm births (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02–1.31). Finally, cleavage-stage embryo transfers were associated with a high risk of infants who were small for gestational age (0.83, 95% CI: 0.76–0.92) and a low risk of those who were large for gestation age (1.14, 95% CI: 1.04–1.25). CONCLUSIONS: The risks of preterm and very preterm births increased after fresh blastocyst transfers versus the risks after fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers. However, in frozen embryo transfers, there were no differences. Blastocyst embryo transfers resulted in high risks of infants who were large for gestational age, and cleavage-stage embryo transfers resulted in high risks of infants who were small for gestational age. BioMed Central 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5418763/ /pubmed/28472983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-017-0255-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Wang, Xingling Du, Mingze Guan, Yichun Wang, Bijun Zhang, Junwei Liu, Zihua Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative neonatal outcomes in singleton births from blastocyst transfers or cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-017-0255-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangxingling comparativeneonataloutcomesinsingletonbirthsfromblastocysttransfersorcleavagestageembryotransfersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dumingze comparativeneonataloutcomesinsingletonbirthsfromblastocysttransfersorcleavagestageembryotransfersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guanyichun comparativeneonataloutcomesinsingletonbirthsfromblastocysttransfersorcleavagestageembryotransfersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangbijun comparativeneonataloutcomesinsingletonbirthsfromblastocysttransfersorcleavagestageembryotransfersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangjunwei comparativeneonataloutcomesinsingletonbirthsfromblastocysttransfersorcleavagestageembryotransfersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuzihua comparativeneonataloutcomesinsingletonbirthsfromblastocysttransfersorcleavagestageembryotransfersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |