Cargando…

Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations

Cognitive control includes maintenance of task-specific processes related to attention, and non-specific regulation of motor threshold. Depending upon the nature of the behavioral tasks, these mechanisms may predispose to different kinds of errors, with either increased or decreased response time (R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Novikov, Nikita A., Nurislamova, Yulia M., Zhozhikashvili, Natalia A., Kalenkovich, Evgenii E., Lapina, Anna A., Chernyshev, Boris V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529478
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00218
_version_ 1783234149019025408
author Novikov, Nikita A.
Nurislamova, Yulia M.
Zhozhikashvili, Natalia A.
Kalenkovich, Evgenii E.
Lapina, Anna A.
Chernyshev, Boris V.
author_facet Novikov, Nikita A.
Nurislamova, Yulia M.
Zhozhikashvili, Natalia A.
Kalenkovich, Evgenii E.
Lapina, Anna A.
Chernyshev, Boris V.
author_sort Novikov, Nikita A.
collection PubMed
description Cognitive control includes maintenance of task-specific processes related to attention, and non-specific regulation of motor threshold. Depending upon the nature of the behavioral tasks, these mechanisms may predispose to different kinds of errors, with either increased or decreased response time (RT) of erroneous responses relative to correct responses. Specifically, slow responses are related to attentional lapses and decision uncertainty, these conditions tending to delay RTs of both erroneous and correct responses. Here we studied if RT may be a valid approximation distinguishing trials with high and low levels of sustained attention and decision uncertainty. We analyzed response-related and feedback-related modulations in theta, alpha and beta band activity in the auditory version of the two-choice condensation task, which is highly demanding for sustained attention while involves no inhibition of prepotent responses. Depending upon response speed and accuracy, trials were divided into slow correct, slow erroneous, fast correct and fast erroneous. We found that error-related frontal midline theta (FMT) was present only on fast erroneous trials. The feedback-related FMT was equally strong on slow erroneous and fast erroneous trials. Late post-response posterior alpha suppression was stronger on erroneous slow trials. Feedback-related frontal beta was present only on slow correct trials. The data obtained cumulatively suggests that RT allows distinguishing the two types of trials, with fast trials related to higher levels of attention and low uncertainty, and slow trials related to lower levels of attention and higher uncertainty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5418942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54189422017-05-19 Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations Novikov, Nikita A. Nurislamova, Yulia M. Zhozhikashvili, Natalia A. Kalenkovich, Evgenii E. Lapina, Anna A. Chernyshev, Boris V. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Cognitive control includes maintenance of task-specific processes related to attention, and non-specific regulation of motor threshold. Depending upon the nature of the behavioral tasks, these mechanisms may predispose to different kinds of errors, with either increased or decreased response time (RT) of erroneous responses relative to correct responses. Specifically, slow responses are related to attentional lapses and decision uncertainty, these conditions tending to delay RTs of both erroneous and correct responses. Here we studied if RT may be a valid approximation distinguishing trials with high and low levels of sustained attention and decision uncertainty. We analyzed response-related and feedback-related modulations in theta, alpha and beta band activity in the auditory version of the two-choice condensation task, which is highly demanding for sustained attention while involves no inhibition of prepotent responses. Depending upon response speed and accuracy, trials were divided into slow correct, slow erroneous, fast correct and fast erroneous. We found that error-related frontal midline theta (FMT) was present only on fast erroneous trials. The feedback-related FMT was equally strong on slow erroneous and fast erroneous trials. Late post-response posterior alpha suppression was stronger on erroneous slow trials. Feedback-related frontal beta was present only on slow correct trials. The data obtained cumulatively suggests that RT allows distinguishing the two types of trials, with fast trials related to higher levels of attention and low uncertainty, and slow trials related to lower levels of attention and higher uncertainty. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5418942/ /pubmed/28529478 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00218 Text en Copyright © 2017 Novikov, Nurislamova, Zhozhikashvili, Kalenkovich, Lapina and Chernyshev. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Novikov, Nikita A.
Nurislamova, Yulia M.
Zhozhikashvili, Natalia A.
Kalenkovich, Evgenii E.
Lapina, Anna A.
Chernyshev, Boris V.
Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
title Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
title_full Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
title_fullStr Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
title_full_unstemmed Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
title_short Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations
title_sort slow and fast responses: two mechanisms of trial outcome processing revealed by eeg oscillations
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529478
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00218
work_keys_str_mv AT novikovnikitaa slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations
AT nurislamovayuliam slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations
AT zhozhikashvilinataliaa slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations
AT kalenkovichevgeniie slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations
AT lapinaannaa slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations
AT chernyshevborisv slowandfastresponsestwomechanismsoftrialoutcomeprocessingrevealedbyeegoscillations