Cargando…

“Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide

Clinical cytology was originally used by clinicians to provide rapid diagnosis. However, with advancing medical subspecialization, few clinicians interpret cytology themselves these days, for example, gynecologists, hematologists, urologists, and occasional gastroenterologist (mainly in Asian countr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hocke, Michael, Topalidis, Theodoros, Braden, Barbara, Dietrich, Christoph F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28440233
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_21_17
_version_ 1783234157247201280
author Hocke, Michael
Topalidis, Theodoros
Braden, Barbara
Dietrich, Christoph F.
author_facet Hocke, Michael
Topalidis, Theodoros
Braden, Barbara
Dietrich, Christoph F.
author_sort Hocke, Michael
collection PubMed
description Clinical cytology was originally used by clinicians to provide rapid diagnosis. However, with advancing medical subspecialization, few clinicians interpret cytology themselves these days, for example, gynecologists, hematologists, urologists, and occasional gastroenterologist (mainly in Asian countries). Cytological assessment enjoyed a renaissance with the development of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Subsequently, pathologists, most of them more experienced in histology, had to take over. Recently, it has been shown that in-room cytology can be easily performed by the endoscopist themselves for initial evaluation of the quality of the EUS-FNA specimen and an initial diagnosis distinguishing benign or malignant cells. Bringing cytology back to the clinician has some advantages but does not substitute the professional cytopathologist. This report has written to lower the threshold for the clinician to find his way back to the microscope, which may improve both their diagnostic yield and assessment of EUS-FNA sample quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5418972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54189722017-05-19 “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide Hocke, Michael Topalidis, Theodoros Braden, Barbara Dietrich, Christoph F. Endosc Ultrasound Review Article Clinical cytology was originally used by clinicians to provide rapid diagnosis. However, with advancing medical subspecialization, few clinicians interpret cytology themselves these days, for example, gynecologists, hematologists, urologists, and occasional gastroenterologist (mainly in Asian countries). Cytological assessment enjoyed a renaissance with the development of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Subsequently, pathologists, most of them more experienced in histology, had to take over. Recently, it has been shown that in-room cytology can be easily performed by the endoscopist themselves for initial evaluation of the quality of the EUS-FNA specimen and an initial diagnosis distinguishing benign or malignant cells. Bringing cytology back to the clinician has some advantages but does not substitute the professional cytopathologist. This report has written to lower the threshold for the clinician to find his way back to the microscope, which may improve both their diagnostic yield and assessment of EUS-FNA sample quality. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5418972/ /pubmed/28440233 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_21_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Spring Media Publishing Co. Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hocke, Michael
Topalidis, Theodoros
Braden, Barbara
Dietrich, Christoph F.
“Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide
title “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide
title_full “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide
title_fullStr “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide
title_full_unstemmed “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide
title_short “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide
title_sort “clinical” cytology for endoscopists: a practical guide
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28440233
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_21_17
work_keys_str_mv AT hockemichael clinicalcytologyforendoscopistsapracticalguide
AT topalidistheodoros clinicalcytologyforendoscopistsapracticalguide
AT bradenbarbara clinicalcytologyforendoscopistsapracticalguide
AT dietrichchristophf clinicalcytologyforendoscopistsapracticalguide