Cargando…
“Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide
Clinical cytology was originally used by clinicians to provide rapid diagnosis. However, with advancing medical subspecialization, few clinicians interpret cytology themselves these days, for example, gynecologists, hematologists, urologists, and occasional gastroenterologist (mainly in Asian countr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28440233 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_21_17 |
_version_ | 1783234157247201280 |
---|---|
author | Hocke, Michael Topalidis, Theodoros Braden, Barbara Dietrich, Christoph F. |
author_facet | Hocke, Michael Topalidis, Theodoros Braden, Barbara Dietrich, Christoph F. |
author_sort | Hocke, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical cytology was originally used by clinicians to provide rapid diagnosis. However, with advancing medical subspecialization, few clinicians interpret cytology themselves these days, for example, gynecologists, hematologists, urologists, and occasional gastroenterologist (mainly in Asian countries). Cytological assessment enjoyed a renaissance with the development of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Subsequently, pathologists, most of them more experienced in histology, had to take over. Recently, it has been shown that in-room cytology can be easily performed by the endoscopist themselves for initial evaluation of the quality of the EUS-FNA specimen and an initial diagnosis distinguishing benign or malignant cells. Bringing cytology back to the clinician has some advantages but does not substitute the professional cytopathologist. This report has written to lower the threshold for the clinician to find his way back to the microscope, which may improve both their diagnostic yield and assessment of EUS-FNA sample quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5418972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54189722017-05-19 “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide Hocke, Michael Topalidis, Theodoros Braden, Barbara Dietrich, Christoph F. Endosc Ultrasound Review Article Clinical cytology was originally used by clinicians to provide rapid diagnosis. However, with advancing medical subspecialization, few clinicians interpret cytology themselves these days, for example, gynecologists, hematologists, urologists, and occasional gastroenterologist (mainly in Asian countries). Cytological assessment enjoyed a renaissance with the development of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Subsequently, pathologists, most of them more experienced in histology, had to take over. Recently, it has been shown that in-room cytology can be easily performed by the endoscopist themselves for initial evaluation of the quality of the EUS-FNA specimen and an initial diagnosis distinguishing benign or malignant cells. Bringing cytology back to the clinician has some advantages but does not substitute the professional cytopathologist. This report has written to lower the threshold for the clinician to find his way back to the microscope, which may improve both their diagnostic yield and assessment of EUS-FNA sample quality. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5418972/ /pubmed/28440233 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_21_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Spring Media Publishing Co. Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hocke, Michael Topalidis, Theodoros Braden, Barbara Dietrich, Christoph F. “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide |
title | “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide |
title_full | “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide |
title_fullStr | “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide |
title_full_unstemmed | “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide |
title_short | “Clinical” cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide |
title_sort | “clinical” cytology for endoscopists: a practical guide |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5418972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28440233 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/eus.eus_21_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hockemichael clinicalcytologyforendoscopistsapracticalguide AT topalidistheodoros clinicalcytologyforendoscopistsapracticalguide AT bradenbarbara clinicalcytologyforendoscopistsapracticalguide AT dietrichchristophf clinicalcytologyforendoscopistsapracticalguide |