Cargando…
Hallmarks of glioblastoma: a systematic review
Despite decades of intense research, the complex biology of glioblastoma (GBM) is not completely understood. Progression-free survival and overall survival have remained unchanged since the implementation of the STUPP regimen in 2005 with concomitant radio-/chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy wit...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
ESMO Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5419216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28912963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000144 |
_version_ | 1783234192314728448 |
---|---|
author | Nørøxe, Dorte Schou Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard Lassen, Ulrik |
author_facet | Nørøxe, Dorte Schou Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard Lassen, Ulrik |
author_sort | Nørøxe, Dorte Schou |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite decades of intense research, the complex biology of glioblastoma (GBM) is not completely understood. Progression-free survival and overall survival have remained unchanged since the implementation of the STUPP regimen in 2005 with concomitant radio-/chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide. In the context of Hanahan and Weinberg's six hallmarks and two emerging hallmarks of cancer, we discuss up-to-date status and recent research in the biology of GBM. We discuss the clinical impact of the research results with the most promising being in the hallmarks ‘enabling replicative immortality’, ‘inducing angiogenesis’, ‘reprogramming cellular energetics’ and ‘evading immune destruction’. This includes the importance of molecular diagnostics according to the new WHO classification and how next generation sequencing is being implemented in the clinical daily life. Molecular results linked together with clinical outcome have revealed the importance of the prognostic biomarker isocitratedehydrogenase (IDH), which is now part of the diagnostic criteria in brain tumours. IDH is discussed in the context of the hallmark ‘reprogramming cellular energetics’. O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status predicts a more favourable response to treatment and is thus a predictive marker. Based on genomic aberrations, Verhaak et al have suggested a division of GBM into three subgroups, namely, proneural, classical and mesenchymal, which could be meaningful in the clinic and could help guide and differentiate treatment decisions according to the specific subgroup. The information achieved will develop and improve precision medicine in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5419216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | ESMO Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54192162017-09-14 Hallmarks of glioblastoma: a systematic review Nørøxe, Dorte Schou Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard Lassen, Ulrik ESMO Open Review Despite decades of intense research, the complex biology of glioblastoma (GBM) is not completely understood. Progression-free survival and overall survival have remained unchanged since the implementation of the STUPP regimen in 2005 with concomitant radio-/chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide. In the context of Hanahan and Weinberg's six hallmarks and two emerging hallmarks of cancer, we discuss up-to-date status and recent research in the biology of GBM. We discuss the clinical impact of the research results with the most promising being in the hallmarks ‘enabling replicative immortality’, ‘inducing angiogenesis’, ‘reprogramming cellular energetics’ and ‘evading immune destruction’. This includes the importance of molecular diagnostics according to the new WHO classification and how next generation sequencing is being implemented in the clinical daily life. Molecular results linked together with clinical outcome have revealed the importance of the prognostic biomarker isocitratedehydrogenase (IDH), which is now part of the diagnostic criteria in brain tumours. IDH is discussed in the context of the hallmark ‘reprogramming cellular energetics’. O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status predicts a more favourable response to treatment and is thus a predictive marker. Based on genomic aberrations, Verhaak et al have suggested a division of GBM into three subgroups, namely, proneural, classical and mesenchymal, which could be meaningful in the clinic and could help guide and differentiate treatment decisions according to the specific subgroup. The information achieved will develop and improve precision medicine in the future. ESMO Open 2017-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5419216/ /pubmed/28912963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000144 Text en © European Society for Medical Oncology (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) [year]. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Review Nørøxe, Dorte Schou Poulsen, Hans Skovgaard Lassen, Ulrik Hallmarks of glioblastoma: a systematic review |
title | Hallmarks of glioblastoma: a systematic review |
title_full | Hallmarks of glioblastoma: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Hallmarks of glioblastoma: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Hallmarks of glioblastoma: a systematic review |
title_short | Hallmarks of glioblastoma: a systematic review |
title_sort | hallmarks of glioblastoma: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5419216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28912963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000144 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nørøxedorteschou hallmarksofglioblastomaasystematicreview AT poulsenhansskovgaard hallmarksofglioblastomaasystematicreview AT lassenulrik hallmarksofglioblastomaasystematicreview |