Cargando…

Advanced Level Practice Education: UK Critical Care Pharmacists’ Opinions in 2015

National UK standards for critical care highlight the need for clinical pharmacists to practice at an advanced level and above. The aim of this research paper was to describe the views of UK critical care pharmacists on the current provision of Advanced Level Practice (ALP) education and accreditati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warin, Ruth E., Bourne, Richard S., Borthwick, Mark, Barton, Greg, Bates, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5419361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970380
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy4010006
_version_ 1783234213625987072
author Warin, Ruth E.
Bourne, Richard S.
Borthwick, Mark
Barton, Greg
Bates, Ian
author_facet Warin, Ruth E.
Bourne, Richard S.
Borthwick, Mark
Barton, Greg
Bates, Ian
author_sort Warin, Ruth E.
collection PubMed
description National UK standards for critical care highlight the need for clinical pharmacists to practice at an advanced level and above. The aim of this research paper was to describe the views of UK critical care pharmacists on the current provision of Advanced Level Practice (ALP) education and accreditation. It sought to identify whether there is a need for a national or regional training programme. A questionnaire was delivered electronically targeting UK critical care pharmacists. Whilst the response rate was low at 40% (166/411); the views expressed were representative of UK practitioners with the majority of responders meeting the national specifications for clinical pharmacist staffing in critical care areas. The responses highlighted work-based learning as the main resource for developing ALP and a lack of suitable training packages. The vast majority of pharmacists identified that a national or regional training programme was required for ALP. The results also identified the main barriers to undertaking ALP accreditation were lack of time, uncertainty regarding the process and its professional benefits and a lack of education and training opportunities. In conclusion, the responses clearly indicated that, for the necessary progression of critical care pharmacists to ALP, a national or regional training programme is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5419361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54193612017-09-29 Advanced Level Practice Education: UK Critical Care Pharmacists’ Opinions in 2015 Warin, Ruth E. Bourne, Richard S. Borthwick, Mark Barton, Greg Bates, Ian Pharmacy (Basel) Project Report National UK standards for critical care highlight the need for clinical pharmacists to practice at an advanced level and above. The aim of this research paper was to describe the views of UK critical care pharmacists on the current provision of Advanced Level Practice (ALP) education and accreditation. It sought to identify whether there is a need for a national or regional training programme. A questionnaire was delivered electronically targeting UK critical care pharmacists. Whilst the response rate was low at 40% (166/411); the views expressed were representative of UK practitioners with the majority of responders meeting the national specifications for clinical pharmacist staffing in critical care areas. The responses highlighted work-based learning as the main resource for developing ALP and a lack of suitable training packages. The vast majority of pharmacists identified that a national or regional training programme was required for ALP. The results also identified the main barriers to undertaking ALP accreditation were lack of time, uncertainty regarding the process and its professional benefits and a lack of education and training opportunities. In conclusion, the responses clearly indicated that, for the necessary progression of critical care pharmacists to ALP, a national or regional training programme is required. MDPI 2016-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5419361/ /pubmed/28970380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy4010006 Text en © 2016 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Project Report
Warin, Ruth E.
Bourne, Richard S.
Borthwick, Mark
Barton, Greg
Bates, Ian
Advanced Level Practice Education: UK Critical Care Pharmacists’ Opinions in 2015
title Advanced Level Practice Education: UK Critical Care Pharmacists’ Opinions in 2015
title_full Advanced Level Practice Education: UK Critical Care Pharmacists’ Opinions in 2015
title_fullStr Advanced Level Practice Education: UK Critical Care Pharmacists’ Opinions in 2015
title_full_unstemmed Advanced Level Practice Education: UK Critical Care Pharmacists’ Opinions in 2015
title_short Advanced Level Practice Education: UK Critical Care Pharmacists’ Opinions in 2015
title_sort advanced level practice education: uk critical care pharmacists’ opinions in 2015
topic Project Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5419361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28970380
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy4010006
work_keys_str_mv AT warinruthe advancedlevelpracticeeducationukcriticalcarepharmacistsopinionsin2015
AT bournerichards advancedlevelpracticeeducationukcriticalcarepharmacistsopinionsin2015
AT borthwickmark advancedlevelpracticeeducationukcriticalcarepharmacistsopinionsin2015
AT bartongreg advancedlevelpracticeeducationukcriticalcarepharmacistsopinionsin2015
AT batesian advancedlevelpracticeeducationukcriticalcarepharmacistsopinionsin2015