Cargando…
A twofold quantum delayed-choice experiment in a superconducting circuit
Wave-particle complementarity lies at the heart of quantum mechanics. To illustrate this mysterious feature, Wheeler proposed the delayed-choice experiment, where a quantum system manifests the wave- or particle-like attribute, depending on the experimental arrangement, which is made after the syste...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5419705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28508079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1603159 |
_version_ | 1783234256532668416 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Ke Xu, Yuan Wang, Weiting Zheng, Shi-Biao Roy, Tanay Kundu, Suman Chand, Madhavi Ranadive, Arpit Vijay, Rajamani Song, Yipu Duan, Luming Sun, Luyan |
author_facet | Liu, Ke Xu, Yuan Wang, Weiting Zheng, Shi-Biao Roy, Tanay Kundu, Suman Chand, Madhavi Ranadive, Arpit Vijay, Rajamani Song, Yipu Duan, Luming Sun, Luyan |
author_sort | Liu, Ke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wave-particle complementarity lies at the heart of quantum mechanics. To illustrate this mysterious feature, Wheeler proposed the delayed-choice experiment, where a quantum system manifests the wave- or particle-like attribute, depending on the experimental arrangement, which is made after the system has entered the interferometer. In recent quantum delayed-choice experiments, these two complementary behaviors were simultaneously observed with a quantum interferometer in a superposition of being closed and open. We suggest and implement a conceptually different quantum delayed-choice experiment by introducing a which-path detector (WPD) that can simultaneously record and neglect the system’s path information, but where the interferometer itself is classical. Our experiment is realized with a superconducting circuit, where a cavity acts as the WPD for an interfering qubit. Using this setup, we implement the first twofold delayed-choice experiment, which demonstrates that the system’s behavior depends not only on the measuring device’s configuration that can be chosen even after the system has been detected but also on whether we a posteriori erase or mark the which-path information, the latter of which cannot be revealed by previous quantum delayed-choice experiments. Our results represent the first demonstration of both counterintuitive features with the same experimental setup, significantly extending the concept of quantum delayed-choice experiment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5419705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | American Association for the Advancement of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54197052017-05-15 A twofold quantum delayed-choice experiment in a superconducting circuit Liu, Ke Xu, Yuan Wang, Weiting Zheng, Shi-Biao Roy, Tanay Kundu, Suman Chand, Madhavi Ranadive, Arpit Vijay, Rajamani Song, Yipu Duan, Luming Sun, Luyan Sci Adv Research Articles Wave-particle complementarity lies at the heart of quantum mechanics. To illustrate this mysterious feature, Wheeler proposed the delayed-choice experiment, where a quantum system manifests the wave- or particle-like attribute, depending on the experimental arrangement, which is made after the system has entered the interferometer. In recent quantum delayed-choice experiments, these two complementary behaviors were simultaneously observed with a quantum interferometer in a superposition of being closed and open. We suggest and implement a conceptually different quantum delayed-choice experiment by introducing a which-path detector (WPD) that can simultaneously record and neglect the system’s path information, but where the interferometer itself is classical. Our experiment is realized with a superconducting circuit, where a cavity acts as the WPD for an interfering qubit. Using this setup, we implement the first twofold delayed-choice experiment, which demonstrates that the system’s behavior depends not only on the measuring device’s configuration that can be chosen even after the system has been detected but also on whether we a posteriori erase or mark the which-path information, the latter of which cannot be revealed by previous quantum delayed-choice experiments. Our results represent the first demonstration of both counterintuitive features with the same experimental setup, significantly extending the concept of quantum delayed-choice experiment. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5419705/ /pubmed/28508079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1603159 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Liu, Ke Xu, Yuan Wang, Weiting Zheng, Shi-Biao Roy, Tanay Kundu, Suman Chand, Madhavi Ranadive, Arpit Vijay, Rajamani Song, Yipu Duan, Luming Sun, Luyan A twofold quantum delayed-choice experiment in a superconducting circuit |
title | A twofold quantum delayed-choice experiment in a superconducting circuit |
title_full | A twofold quantum delayed-choice experiment in a superconducting circuit |
title_fullStr | A twofold quantum delayed-choice experiment in a superconducting circuit |
title_full_unstemmed | A twofold quantum delayed-choice experiment in a superconducting circuit |
title_short | A twofold quantum delayed-choice experiment in a superconducting circuit |
title_sort | twofold quantum delayed-choice experiment in a superconducting circuit |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5419705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28508079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1603159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuke atwofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT xuyuan atwofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT wangweiting atwofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT zhengshibiao atwofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT roytanay atwofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT kundusuman atwofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT chandmadhavi atwofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT ranadivearpit atwofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT vijayrajamani atwofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT songyipu atwofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT duanluming atwofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT sunluyan atwofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT liuke twofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT xuyuan twofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT wangweiting twofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT zhengshibiao twofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT roytanay twofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT kundusuman twofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT chandmadhavi twofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT ranadivearpit twofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT vijayrajamani twofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT songyipu twofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT duanluming twofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit AT sunluyan twofoldquantumdelayedchoiceexperimentinasuperconductingcircuit |