Cargando…

Time to re-think picky eating?: a relational approach to understanding picky eating

BACKGROUND: Estimates of picky eating are quite high among young children, with 14-50% of parents identifying their preschoolers as picky eaters. Dietary intake and preferences during the preschool years are characterized by slowing growth rates and children developing a sense of autonomy over their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walton, Kathryn, Kuczynski, Leon, Haycraft, Emma, Breen, Andrea, Haines, Jess
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5420103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0520-0
_version_ 1783234344684355584
author Walton, Kathryn
Kuczynski, Leon
Haycraft, Emma
Breen, Andrea
Haines, Jess
author_facet Walton, Kathryn
Kuczynski, Leon
Haycraft, Emma
Breen, Andrea
Haines, Jess
author_sort Walton, Kathryn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Estimates of picky eating are quite high among young children, with 14-50% of parents identifying their preschoolers as picky eaters. Dietary intake and preferences during the preschool years are characterized by slowing growth rates and children developing a sense of autonomy over their feeding and food selection. We argue that the current conceptualization of picky eating defines acts of resistance or expressions of preference (acts of autonomy) by a child as deviant behaviour. This conceptualization has guided research that uses a unidirectional, parent to child approach to understanding parent-child feeding interactions. OBJECTIVES: By reviewing the current feeding literature and drawing parallels from the rich body of child socialization literature, we argue that there is a need to both re-examine the concept and parent/clinician perspectives on picky eating. Thus, the objective of this paper is two-fold: 1) We argue for a reconceptualization of picky eating whereby child agency is considered in terms of eating preferences rather than categorized as compliant or non-compliant behaviour, and 2) We advocate the use of bi-directional relational models of causality and appropriate methodology to understanding the parent-child feeding relationship. DISCUSSION: Researchers are often interested in understanding how members in the parent-child dyad affect one another. Although many tend to focus on the parent to child direction of these associations, findings from child socialization research suggest that influence is bidirectional and non-linear such that parents influence the actions and cognitions of children and children influence the actions and cognitions of parents. Bi-directional models of causality are needed to correctly understand parent-child feeding interactions. CONCLUSIONS: A reconceptualization of picky eating may elucidate the influence that parental feeding practices and child eating habits have on each other. This may allow health professionals to more effectively support parents in developing healthy eating habits among children, reducing both stress around mealtimes and concerns of picky eating.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5420103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54201032017-05-08 Time to re-think picky eating?: a relational approach to understanding picky eating Walton, Kathryn Kuczynski, Leon Haycraft, Emma Breen, Andrea Haines, Jess Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Debate BACKGROUND: Estimates of picky eating are quite high among young children, with 14-50% of parents identifying their preschoolers as picky eaters. Dietary intake and preferences during the preschool years are characterized by slowing growth rates and children developing a sense of autonomy over their feeding and food selection. We argue that the current conceptualization of picky eating defines acts of resistance or expressions of preference (acts of autonomy) by a child as deviant behaviour. This conceptualization has guided research that uses a unidirectional, parent to child approach to understanding parent-child feeding interactions. OBJECTIVES: By reviewing the current feeding literature and drawing parallels from the rich body of child socialization literature, we argue that there is a need to both re-examine the concept and parent/clinician perspectives on picky eating. Thus, the objective of this paper is two-fold: 1) We argue for a reconceptualization of picky eating whereby child agency is considered in terms of eating preferences rather than categorized as compliant or non-compliant behaviour, and 2) We advocate the use of bi-directional relational models of causality and appropriate methodology to understanding the parent-child feeding relationship. DISCUSSION: Researchers are often interested in understanding how members in the parent-child dyad affect one another. Although many tend to focus on the parent to child direction of these associations, findings from child socialization research suggest that influence is bidirectional and non-linear such that parents influence the actions and cognitions of children and children influence the actions and cognitions of parents. Bi-directional models of causality are needed to correctly understand parent-child feeding interactions. CONCLUSIONS: A reconceptualization of picky eating may elucidate the influence that parental feeding practices and child eating habits have on each other. This may allow health professionals to more effectively support parents in developing healthy eating habits among children, reducing both stress around mealtimes and concerns of picky eating. BioMed Central 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5420103/ /pubmed/28476160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0520-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Walton, Kathryn
Kuczynski, Leon
Haycraft, Emma
Breen, Andrea
Haines, Jess
Time to re-think picky eating?: a relational approach to understanding picky eating
title Time to re-think picky eating?: a relational approach to understanding picky eating
title_full Time to re-think picky eating?: a relational approach to understanding picky eating
title_fullStr Time to re-think picky eating?: a relational approach to understanding picky eating
title_full_unstemmed Time to re-think picky eating?: a relational approach to understanding picky eating
title_short Time to re-think picky eating?: a relational approach to understanding picky eating
title_sort time to re-think picky eating?: a relational approach to understanding picky eating
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5420103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0520-0
work_keys_str_mv AT waltonkathryn timetorethinkpickyeatingarelationalapproachtounderstandingpickyeating
AT kuczynskileon timetorethinkpickyeatingarelationalapproachtounderstandingpickyeating
AT haycraftemma timetorethinkpickyeatingarelationalapproachtounderstandingpickyeating
AT breenandrea timetorethinkpickyeatingarelationalapproachtounderstandingpickyeating
AT hainesjess timetorethinkpickyeatingarelationalapproachtounderstandingpickyeating