Cargando…

Key aspects related to implementation of risk stratification in health care systems-the ASSEHS study

BACKGROUND: The lack of proven efficacy of new healthcare interventions represents a problem for health systems globally. It is partly related to suboptimal implementation processes, leading to poor adoption of new interventions. Activation of Stratification Strategies and Results of the interventio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mora, Joana, Iturralde, Miren David, Prieto, Lucía, Domingo, Cristina, Gagnon, Marie-Pierre, Martínez-Carazo, Catalina, March, Anna Giné, De Massari, Daniele, Martí, Tino, Nalin, Marco, Avolio, Francesca, Bousquet, Jean, Keenoy, Esteban de Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5420130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2275-3
_version_ 1783234351844032512
author Mora, Joana
Iturralde, Miren David
Prieto, Lucía
Domingo, Cristina
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Martínez-Carazo, Catalina
March, Anna Giné
De Massari, Daniele
Martí, Tino
Nalin, Marco
Avolio, Francesca
Bousquet, Jean
Keenoy, Esteban de Manuel
author_facet Mora, Joana
Iturralde, Miren David
Prieto, Lucía
Domingo, Cristina
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Martínez-Carazo, Catalina
March, Anna Giné
De Massari, Daniele
Martí, Tino
Nalin, Marco
Avolio, Francesca
Bousquet, Jean
Keenoy, Esteban de Manuel
author_sort Mora, Joana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The lack of proven efficacy of new healthcare interventions represents a problem for health systems globally. It is partly related to suboptimal implementation processes, leading to poor adoption of new interventions. Activation of Stratification Strategies and Results of the interventions on frail patients of Healthcare Services (ASSEHS) EU project (N° 2013 12 04) aims to study current existing health Risk Stratification (RS) strategies and tools on frail elderly patients. This paper aims at identifying variables that make the implementation of population RS tools feasible in different healthcare services. METHODS: Two different methods have been used to identify the key elements in stratification implementation; i) a Scoping Review, in order to search and gather scientific evidence and ii) Semi-structured interviews with six key experts that had been actively involved in the design and/or implementation of RS strategies. It aims to focus the implementation construct on real-life contextual understandings, multi-level perspectives, and cultural influences. RESULTS: A Feasibility Framework has been drawn. Two dimensions impact the feasibility of RS: (i) Planning, deployment and change management and (ii) Care intervention. The former comprises communication, training and mutual learning, multidisciplinarity of the team, clinicians’ engagement, operational plan and ICT display and functionalities. The latter includes case finding and selection of the target population, pathway definition and quality improvement process. CONCLUSIONS: The Feasibility Framework provides a list of key elements that should be considered for an effective implementation of population risk stratification interventions. It helps to identify, plan and consider relevant elements to ensure a proper RS implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2275-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5420130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54201302017-05-08 Key aspects related to implementation of risk stratification in health care systems-the ASSEHS study Mora, Joana Iturralde, Miren David Prieto, Lucía Domingo, Cristina Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Martínez-Carazo, Catalina March, Anna Giné De Massari, Daniele Martí, Tino Nalin, Marco Avolio, Francesca Bousquet, Jean Keenoy, Esteban de Manuel BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The lack of proven efficacy of new healthcare interventions represents a problem for health systems globally. It is partly related to suboptimal implementation processes, leading to poor adoption of new interventions. Activation of Stratification Strategies and Results of the interventions on frail patients of Healthcare Services (ASSEHS) EU project (N° 2013 12 04) aims to study current existing health Risk Stratification (RS) strategies and tools on frail elderly patients. This paper aims at identifying variables that make the implementation of population RS tools feasible in different healthcare services. METHODS: Two different methods have been used to identify the key elements in stratification implementation; i) a Scoping Review, in order to search and gather scientific evidence and ii) Semi-structured interviews with six key experts that had been actively involved in the design and/or implementation of RS strategies. It aims to focus the implementation construct on real-life contextual understandings, multi-level perspectives, and cultural influences. RESULTS: A Feasibility Framework has been drawn. Two dimensions impact the feasibility of RS: (i) Planning, deployment and change management and (ii) Care intervention. The former comprises communication, training and mutual learning, multidisciplinarity of the team, clinicians’ engagement, operational plan and ICT display and functionalities. The latter includes case finding and selection of the target population, pathway definition and quality improvement process. CONCLUSIONS: The Feasibility Framework provides a list of key elements that should be considered for an effective implementation of population risk stratification interventions. It helps to identify, plan and consider relevant elements to ensure a proper RS implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2275-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5420130/ /pubmed/28476126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2275-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mora, Joana
Iturralde, Miren David
Prieto, Lucía
Domingo, Cristina
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Martínez-Carazo, Catalina
March, Anna Giné
De Massari, Daniele
Martí, Tino
Nalin, Marco
Avolio, Francesca
Bousquet, Jean
Keenoy, Esteban de Manuel
Key aspects related to implementation of risk stratification in health care systems-the ASSEHS study
title Key aspects related to implementation of risk stratification in health care systems-the ASSEHS study
title_full Key aspects related to implementation of risk stratification in health care systems-the ASSEHS study
title_fullStr Key aspects related to implementation of risk stratification in health care systems-the ASSEHS study
title_full_unstemmed Key aspects related to implementation of risk stratification in health care systems-the ASSEHS study
title_short Key aspects related to implementation of risk stratification in health care systems-the ASSEHS study
title_sort key aspects related to implementation of risk stratification in health care systems-the assehs study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5420130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476126
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2275-3
work_keys_str_mv AT morajoana keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT iturraldemirendavid keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT prietolucia keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT domingocristina keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT gagnonmariepierre keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT martinezcarazocatalina keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT marchannagine keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT demassaridaniele keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT martitino keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT nalinmarco keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT avoliofrancesca keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT bousquetjean keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT keenoyestebandemanuel keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy
AT keyaspectsrelatedtoimplementationofriskstratificationinhealthcaresystemstheassehsstudy