Cargando…
Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research
Research on the human microbiome has yielded numerous insights into health and disease, but also has resulted in a wealth of experimental artifacts. Here, we present suggestions for optimizing experimental design and avoiding known pitfalls, organized in the typical order in which studies are carrie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5420141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5 |
_version_ | 1783234354637438976 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Dorothy Hofstaedter, Casey E. Zhao, Chunyu Mattei, Lisa Tanes, Ceylan Clarke, Erik Lauder, Abigail Sherrill-Mix, Scott Chehoud, Christel Kelsen, Judith Conrad, Máire Collman, Ronald G. Baldassano, Robert Bushman, Frederic D. Bittinger, Kyle |
author_facet | Kim, Dorothy Hofstaedter, Casey E. Zhao, Chunyu Mattei, Lisa Tanes, Ceylan Clarke, Erik Lauder, Abigail Sherrill-Mix, Scott Chehoud, Christel Kelsen, Judith Conrad, Máire Collman, Ronald G. Baldassano, Robert Bushman, Frederic D. Bittinger, Kyle |
author_sort | Kim, Dorothy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research on the human microbiome has yielded numerous insights into health and disease, but also has resulted in a wealth of experimental artifacts. Here, we present suggestions for optimizing experimental design and avoiding known pitfalls, organized in the typical order in which studies are carried out. We first review best practices in experimental design and introduce common confounders such as age, diet, antibiotic use, pet ownership, longitudinal instability, and microbial sharing during cohousing in animal studies. Typically, samples will need to be stored, so we provide data on best practices for several sample types. We then discuss design and analysis of positive and negative controls, which should always be run with experimental samples. We introduce a convenient set of non-biological DNA sequences that can be useful as positive controls for high-volume analysis. Careful analysis of negative and positive controls is particularly important in studies of samples with low microbial biomass, where contamination can comprise most or all of a sample. Lastly, we summarize approaches to enhancing experimental robustness by careful control of multiple comparisons and to comparing discovery and validation cohorts. We hope the experimental tactics summarized here will help researchers in this exciting field advance their studies efficiently while avoiding errors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5420141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54201412017-05-08 Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research Kim, Dorothy Hofstaedter, Casey E. Zhao, Chunyu Mattei, Lisa Tanes, Ceylan Clarke, Erik Lauder, Abigail Sherrill-Mix, Scott Chehoud, Christel Kelsen, Judith Conrad, Máire Collman, Ronald G. Baldassano, Robert Bushman, Frederic D. Bittinger, Kyle Microbiome Review Research on the human microbiome has yielded numerous insights into health and disease, but also has resulted in a wealth of experimental artifacts. Here, we present suggestions for optimizing experimental design and avoiding known pitfalls, organized in the typical order in which studies are carried out. We first review best practices in experimental design and introduce common confounders such as age, diet, antibiotic use, pet ownership, longitudinal instability, and microbial sharing during cohousing in animal studies. Typically, samples will need to be stored, so we provide data on best practices for several sample types. We then discuss design and analysis of positive and negative controls, which should always be run with experimental samples. We introduce a convenient set of non-biological DNA sequences that can be useful as positive controls for high-volume analysis. Careful analysis of negative and positive controls is particularly important in studies of samples with low microbial biomass, where contamination can comprise most or all of a sample. Lastly, we summarize approaches to enhancing experimental robustness by careful control of multiple comparisons and to comparing discovery and validation cohorts. We hope the experimental tactics summarized here will help researchers in this exciting field advance their studies efficiently while avoiding errors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5420141/ /pubmed/28476139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Kim, Dorothy Hofstaedter, Casey E. Zhao, Chunyu Mattei, Lisa Tanes, Ceylan Clarke, Erik Lauder, Abigail Sherrill-Mix, Scott Chehoud, Christel Kelsen, Judith Conrad, Máire Collman, Ronald G. Baldassano, Robert Bushman, Frederic D. Bittinger, Kyle Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research |
title | Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research |
title_full | Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research |
title_fullStr | Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research |
title_short | Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research |
title_sort | optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5420141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimdorothy optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT hofstaedtercaseye optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT zhaochunyu optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT matteilisa optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT tanesceylan optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT clarkeerik optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT lauderabigail optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT sherrillmixscott optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT chehoudchristel optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT kelsenjudith optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT conradmaire optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT collmanronaldg optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT baldassanorobert optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT bushmanfredericd optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch AT bittingerkyle optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch |