Cargando…

Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research

Research on the human microbiome has yielded numerous insights into health and disease, but also has resulted in a wealth of experimental artifacts. Here, we present suggestions for optimizing experimental design and avoiding known pitfalls, organized in the typical order in which studies are carrie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Dorothy, Hofstaedter, Casey E., Zhao, Chunyu, Mattei, Lisa, Tanes, Ceylan, Clarke, Erik, Lauder, Abigail, Sherrill-Mix, Scott, Chehoud, Christel, Kelsen, Judith, Conrad, Máire, Collman, Ronald G., Baldassano, Robert, Bushman, Frederic D., Bittinger, Kyle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5420141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5
_version_ 1783234354637438976
author Kim, Dorothy
Hofstaedter, Casey E.
Zhao, Chunyu
Mattei, Lisa
Tanes, Ceylan
Clarke, Erik
Lauder, Abigail
Sherrill-Mix, Scott
Chehoud, Christel
Kelsen, Judith
Conrad, Máire
Collman, Ronald G.
Baldassano, Robert
Bushman, Frederic D.
Bittinger, Kyle
author_facet Kim, Dorothy
Hofstaedter, Casey E.
Zhao, Chunyu
Mattei, Lisa
Tanes, Ceylan
Clarke, Erik
Lauder, Abigail
Sherrill-Mix, Scott
Chehoud, Christel
Kelsen, Judith
Conrad, Máire
Collman, Ronald G.
Baldassano, Robert
Bushman, Frederic D.
Bittinger, Kyle
author_sort Kim, Dorothy
collection PubMed
description Research on the human microbiome has yielded numerous insights into health and disease, but also has resulted in a wealth of experimental artifacts. Here, we present suggestions for optimizing experimental design and avoiding known pitfalls, organized in the typical order in which studies are carried out. We first review best practices in experimental design and introduce common confounders such as age, diet, antibiotic use, pet ownership, longitudinal instability, and microbial sharing during cohousing in animal studies. Typically, samples will need to be stored, so we provide data on best practices for several sample types. We then discuss design and analysis of positive and negative controls, which should always be run with experimental samples. We introduce a convenient set of non-biological DNA sequences that can be useful as positive controls for high-volume analysis. Careful analysis of negative and positive controls is particularly important in studies of samples with low microbial biomass, where contamination can comprise most or all of a sample. Lastly, we summarize approaches to enhancing experimental robustness by careful control of multiple comparisons and to comparing discovery and validation cohorts. We hope the experimental tactics summarized here will help researchers in this exciting field advance their studies efficiently while avoiding errors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5420141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54201412017-05-08 Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research Kim, Dorothy Hofstaedter, Casey E. Zhao, Chunyu Mattei, Lisa Tanes, Ceylan Clarke, Erik Lauder, Abigail Sherrill-Mix, Scott Chehoud, Christel Kelsen, Judith Conrad, Máire Collman, Ronald G. Baldassano, Robert Bushman, Frederic D. Bittinger, Kyle Microbiome Review Research on the human microbiome has yielded numerous insights into health and disease, but also has resulted in a wealth of experimental artifacts. Here, we present suggestions for optimizing experimental design and avoiding known pitfalls, organized in the typical order in which studies are carried out. We first review best practices in experimental design and introduce common confounders such as age, diet, antibiotic use, pet ownership, longitudinal instability, and microbial sharing during cohousing in animal studies. Typically, samples will need to be stored, so we provide data on best practices for several sample types. We then discuss design and analysis of positive and negative controls, which should always be run with experimental samples. We introduce a convenient set of non-biological DNA sequences that can be useful as positive controls for high-volume analysis. Careful analysis of negative and positive controls is particularly important in studies of samples with low microbial biomass, where contamination can comprise most or all of a sample. Lastly, we summarize approaches to enhancing experimental robustness by careful control of multiple comparisons and to comparing discovery and validation cohorts. We hope the experimental tactics summarized here will help researchers in this exciting field advance their studies efficiently while avoiding errors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5420141/ /pubmed/28476139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Kim, Dorothy
Hofstaedter, Casey E.
Zhao, Chunyu
Mattei, Lisa
Tanes, Ceylan
Clarke, Erik
Lauder, Abigail
Sherrill-Mix, Scott
Chehoud, Christel
Kelsen, Judith
Conrad, Máire
Collman, Ronald G.
Baldassano, Robert
Bushman, Frederic D.
Bittinger, Kyle
Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research
title Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research
title_full Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research
title_fullStr Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research
title_short Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research
title_sort optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5420141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0267-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdorothy optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT hofstaedtercaseye optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT zhaochunyu optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT matteilisa optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT tanesceylan optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT clarkeerik optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT lauderabigail optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT sherrillmixscott optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT chehoudchristel optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT kelsenjudith optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT conradmaire optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT collmanronaldg optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT baldassanorobert optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT bushmanfredericd optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch
AT bittingerkyle optimizingmethodsanddodgingpitfallsinmicrobiomeresearch