Cargando…

Changes in the Relative Balance of Approach and Avoidance Inclinations to Use Alcohol Following Cue Exposure Vary in Low and High Risk Drinkers

According to the ambivalence model of craving, alcohol craving involves the dynamic interplay of separate approach and avoidance inclinations. Cue-elicited increases in approach inclinations are posited to be more likely to result in alcohol consumption and risky drinking behaviors only if unimpeded...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollett, Ross C., Stritzke, Werner G. K., Edgeworth, Phoebe, Weinborn, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5420565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533759
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00645
_version_ 1783234412246204416
author Hollett, Ross C.
Stritzke, Werner G. K.
Edgeworth, Phoebe
Weinborn, Michael
author_facet Hollett, Ross C.
Stritzke, Werner G. K.
Edgeworth, Phoebe
Weinborn, Michael
author_sort Hollett, Ross C.
collection PubMed
description According to the ambivalence model of craving, alcohol craving involves the dynamic interplay of separate approach and avoidance inclinations. Cue-elicited increases in approach inclinations are posited to be more likely to result in alcohol consumption and risky drinking behaviors only if unimpeded by restraint inclinations. Current study aims were (1) to test if changes in the net balance between approach and avoidance inclinations following alcohol cue exposure differentiate between low and high risk drinkers, and (2) if this balance is associated with alcohol consumption on a subsequent taste test. In two experiments (N = 60; N = 79), low and high risk social drinkers were exposed to alcohol cues, and pre- and post- approach and avoidance inclinations measured. An ad libitum alcohol consumption paradigm and a non-alcohol exposure condition were also included in Study 2. Cue-elicited craving was characterized by a predominant approach inclination only in the high risk drinkers. Conversely, approach inclinations were adaptively balanced by equally strong avoidance inclinations when cue-elicited craving was induced in low risk drinkers. For these low risk drinkers with the balanced craving profile, neither approach or avoidance inclinations predicted subsequent alcohol consumption levels during the taste test. Conversely, for high risk drinkers, where the approach inclination predominated, each inclination synergistically predicted subsequent drinking levels during the taste test. In conclusion, results support the importance of assessing both approach and avoidance inclinations, and their relative balance following alcohol cue exposure. Specifically, this more comprehensive assessment reveals changes in craving profiles that are not apparent from examining changes in approach inclinations alone, and it is this shift in the net balance that distinguishes high from low risk drinkers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5420565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54205652017-05-22 Changes in the Relative Balance of Approach and Avoidance Inclinations to Use Alcohol Following Cue Exposure Vary in Low and High Risk Drinkers Hollett, Ross C. Stritzke, Werner G. K. Edgeworth, Phoebe Weinborn, Michael Front Psychol Psychology According to the ambivalence model of craving, alcohol craving involves the dynamic interplay of separate approach and avoidance inclinations. Cue-elicited increases in approach inclinations are posited to be more likely to result in alcohol consumption and risky drinking behaviors only if unimpeded by restraint inclinations. Current study aims were (1) to test if changes in the net balance between approach and avoidance inclinations following alcohol cue exposure differentiate between low and high risk drinkers, and (2) if this balance is associated with alcohol consumption on a subsequent taste test. In two experiments (N = 60; N = 79), low and high risk social drinkers were exposed to alcohol cues, and pre- and post- approach and avoidance inclinations measured. An ad libitum alcohol consumption paradigm and a non-alcohol exposure condition were also included in Study 2. Cue-elicited craving was characterized by a predominant approach inclination only in the high risk drinkers. Conversely, approach inclinations were adaptively balanced by equally strong avoidance inclinations when cue-elicited craving was induced in low risk drinkers. For these low risk drinkers with the balanced craving profile, neither approach or avoidance inclinations predicted subsequent alcohol consumption levels during the taste test. Conversely, for high risk drinkers, where the approach inclination predominated, each inclination synergistically predicted subsequent drinking levels during the taste test. In conclusion, results support the importance of assessing both approach and avoidance inclinations, and their relative balance following alcohol cue exposure. Specifically, this more comprehensive assessment reveals changes in craving profiles that are not apparent from examining changes in approach inclinations alone, and it is this shift in the net balance that distinguishes high from low risk drinkers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5420565/ /pubmed/28533759 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00645 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hollett, Stritzke, Edgeworth and Weinborn. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hollett, Ross C.
Stritzke, Werner G. K.
Edgeworth, Phoebe
Weinborn, Michael
Changes in the Relative Balance of Approach and Avoidance Inclinations to Use Alcohol Following Cue Exposure Vary in Low and High Risk Drinkers
title Changes in the Relative Balance of Approach and Avoidance Inclinations to Use Alcohol Following Cue Exposure Vary in Low and High Risk Drinkers
title_full Changes in the Relative Balance of Approach and Avoidance Inclinations to Use Alcohol Following Cue Exposure Vary in Low and High Risk Drinkers
title_fullStr Changes in the Relative Balance of Approach and Avoidance Inclinations to Use Alcohol Following Cue Exposure Vary in Low and High Risk Drinkers
title_full_unstemmed Changes in the Relative Balance of Approach and Avoidance Inclinations to Use Alcohol Following Cue Exposure Vary in Low and High Risk Drinkers
title_short Changes in the Relative Balance of Approach and Avoidance Inclinations to Use Alcohol Following Cue Exposure Vary in Low and High Risk Drinkers
title_sort changes in the relative balance of approach and avoidance inclinations to use alcohol following cue exposure vary in low and high risk drinkers
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5420565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533759
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00645
work_keys_str_mv AT hollettrossc changesintherelativebalanceofapproachandavoidanceinclinationstousealcoholfollowingcueexposurevaryinlowandhighriskdrinkers
AT stritzkewernergk changesintherelativebalanceofapproachandavoidanceinclinationstousealcoholfollowingcueexposurevaryinlowandhighriskdrinkers
AT edgeworthphoebe changesintherelativebalanceofapproachandavoidanceinclinationstousealcoholfollowingcueexposurevaryinlowandhighriskdrinkers
AT weinbornmichael changesintherelativebalanceofapproachandavoidanceinclinationstousealcoholfollowingcueexposurevaryinlowandhighriskdrinkers