Cargando…
Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer
INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal tumor seeding is a common form of recurrence after gastric cancer surgery. The finding of free tumor cells and/or elevation of tumor markers in the peritoneal fluid could predict intraperitoneal tumor recurrence. The results of these examination can be used for indication of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5420630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28507577 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.64044 |
_version_ | 1783234428959457280 |
---|---|
author | Hoskovec, David Varga, Jozef Dytrych, Petr Konecna, Ellen Matek, Jan |
author_facet | Hoskovec, David Varga, Jozef Dytrych, Petr Konecna, Ellen Matek, Jan |
author_sort | Hoskovec, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal tumor seeding is a common form of recurrence after gastric cancer surgery. The finding of free tumor cells and/or elevation of tumor markers in the peritoneal fluid could predict intraperitoneal tumor recurrence. The results of these examination can be used for indication of aggressive treatment modalities such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have operated on 105 patients suffering from gastric cancer. The control group consisted of 12 patients without malignant disease. Peritoneal lavage fluid or ascites was collected immediately after laparotomy and examined by cytology and biochemistry (levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and Ca 19–9). Sensitivity, specificity, stage correlation and overall survival were observed. RESULTS: Elevation of tumor markers or the finding of free intraperitoneal tumor cells predicts recurrence. The prognosis of these patients is same as in stage IV TNM classification with median survival time less than 1 year (p = 0.713). Patients with negative cytology have median survival time 5 years contrary to them with positive cytology (p < 0.001). Sensitivity of the cytology was 34% and specificity was 85%. Sensitivity of biochemistry was 53% (combination of both markers) and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the importance of peritoneal fluid examination for the prognosis. We cannot recommend routine use as an indicator for HIPEC due to low sensitivity, but the result of cytological examination is an independent factor for patient survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5420630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54206302017-05-15 Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer Hoskovec, David Varga, Jozef Dytrych, Petr Konecna, Ellen Matek, Jan Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: Peritoneal tumor seeding is a common form of recurrence after gastric cancer surgery. The finding of free tumor cells and/or elevation of tumor markers in the peritoneal fluid could predict intraperitoneal tumor recurrence. The results of these examination can be used for indication of aggressive treatment modalities such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have operated on 105 patients suffering from gastric cancer. The control group consisted of 12 patients without malignant disease. Peritoneal lavage fluid or ascites was collected immediately after laparotomy and examined by cytology and biochemistry (levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and Ca 19–9). Sensitivity, specificity, stage correlation and overall survival were observed. RESULTS: Elevation of tumor markers or the finding of free intraperitoneal tumor cells predicts recurrence. The prognosis of these patients is same as in stage IV TNM classification with median survival time less than 1 year (p = 0.713). Patients with negative cytology have median survival time 5 years contrary to them with positive cytology (p < 0.001). Sensitivity of the cytology was 34% and specificity was 85%. Sensitivity of biochemistry was 53% (combination of both markers) and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the importance of peritoneal fluid examination for the prognosis. We cannot recommend routine use as an indicator for HIPEC due to low sensitivity, but the result of cytological examination is an independent factor for patient survival. Termedia Publishing House 2016-11-29 2017-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5420630/ /pubmed/28507577 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.64044 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Hoskovec, David Varga, Jozef Dytrych, Petr Konecna, Ellen Matek, Jan Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer |
title | Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer |
title_full | Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer |
title_fullStr | Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer |
title_short | Peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer |
title_sort | peritoneal lavage examination as a prognostic tool in cases of gastric cancer |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5420630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28507577 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.64044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoskovecdavid peritoneallavageexaminationasaprognostictoolincasesofgastriccancer AT vargajozef peritoneallavageexaminationasaprognostictoolincasesofgastriccancer AT dytrychpetr peritoneallavageexaminationasaprognostictoolincasesofgastriccancer AT konecnaellen peritoneallavageexaminationasaprognostictoolincasesofgastriccancer AT matekjan peritoneallavageexaminationasaprognostictoolincasesofgastriccancer |