Cargando…
Controls of primary production in two phytoplankton blooms in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current
The Antarctic Circumpolar Current has a high potential for primary production and carbon sequestration through the biological pump. In the current study, two large-scale blooms observed in 2012 during a cruise with R.V. Polarstern were investigated with respect to phytoplankton standing stocks, prim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pergamon Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5421167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.10.005 |
_version_ | 1783234548130119680 |
---|---|
author | Hoppe, C.J.M. Klaas, C. Ossebaar, S. Soppa, M.A. Cheah, W. Laglera, L.M. Santos-Echeandia, J. Rost, B. Wolf-Gladrow, D.A. Bracher, A. Hoppema, M. Strass, V. Trimborn, S. |
author_facet | Hoppe, C.J.M. Klaas, C. Ossebaar, S. Soppa, M.A. Cheah, W. Laglera, L.M. Santos-Echeandia, J. Rost, B. Wolf-Gladrow, D.A. Bracher, A. Hoppema, M. Strass, V. Trimborn, S. |
author_sort | Hoppe, C.J.M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Antarctic Circumpolar Current has a high potential for primary production and carbon sequestration through the biological pump. In the current study, two large-scale blooms observed in 2012 during a cruise with R.V. Polarstern were investigated with respect to phytoplankton standing stocks, primary productivity and nutrient budgets. While net primary productivity was similar in both blooms, chlorophyll a –specific photosynthesis was more efficient in the bloom closer to the island of South Georgia (39 °W, 50 °S) compared to the open ocean bloom further east (12 °W, 51 °S). We did not find evidence for light being the driver of bloom dynamics as chlorophyll standing stocks up to 165 mg m(−2) developed despite mixed layers as deep as 90 m. Since the two bloom regions differ in their distance to shelf areas, potential sources of iron vary. Nutrient (nitrate, phosphate, silicate) deficits were similar in both areas despite different bloom ages, but their ratios indicated more pronounced iron limitation at 12 °W compared to 39 °W. While primarily the supply of iron and not the availability of light seemed to control onset and duration of the blooms, higher grazing pressure could have exerted a stronger control toward the declining phase of the blooms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5421167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Pergamon Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54211672017-05-15 Controls of primary production in two phytoplankton blooms in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current Hoppe, C.J.M. Klaas, C. Ossebaar, S. Soppa, M.A. Cheah, W. Laglera, L.M. Santos-Echeandia, J. Rost, B. Wolf-Gladrow, D.A. Bracher, A. Hoppema, M. Strass, V. Trimborn, S. Deep Sea Res Part 2 Top Stud Oceanogr Article The Antarctic Circumpolar Current has a high potential for primary production and carbon sequestration through the biological pump. In the current study, two large-scale blooms observed in 2012 during a cruise with R.V. Polarstern were investigated with respect to phytoplankton standing stocks, primary productivity and nutrient budgets. While net primary productivity was similar in both blooms, chlorophyll a –specific photosynthesis was more efficient in the bloom closer to the island of South Georgia (39 °W, 50 °S) compared to the open ocean bloom further east (12 °W, 51 °S). We did not find evidence for light being the driver of bloom dynamics as chlorophyll standing stocks up to 165 mg m(−2) developed despite mixed layers as deep as 90 m. Since the two bloom regions differ in their distance to shelf areas, potential sources of iron vary. Nutrient (nitrate, phosphate, silicate) deficits were similar in both areas despite different bloom ages, but their ratios indicated more pronounced iron limitation at 12 °W compared to 39 °W. While primarily the supply of iron and not the availability of light seemed to control onset and duration of the blooms, higher grazing pressure could have exerted a stronger control toward the declining phase of the blooms. Pergamon Press 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5421167/ /pubmed/28515575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.10.005 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hoppe, C.J.M. Klaas, C. Ossebaar, S. Soppa, M.A. Cheah, W. Laglera, L.M. Santos-Echeandia, J. Rost, B. Wolf-Gladrow, D.A. Bracher, A. Hoppema, M. Strass, V. Trimborn, S. Controls of primary production in two phytoplankton blooms in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current |
title | Controls of primary production in two phytoplankton blooms in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current |
title_full | Controls of primary production in two phytoplankton blooms in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current |
title_fullStr | Controls of primary production in two phytoplankton blooms in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current |
title_full_unstemmed | Controls of primary production in two phytoplankton blooms in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current |
title_short | Controls of primary production in two phytoplankton blooms in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current |
title_sort | controls of primary production in two phytoplankton blooms in the antarctic circumpolar current |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5421167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.10.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoppecjm controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent AT klaasc controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent AT ossebaars controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent AT soppama controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent AT cheahw controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent AT lagleralm controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent AT santosecheandiaj controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent AT rostb controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent AT wolfgladrowda controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent AT brachera controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent AT hoppemam controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent AT strassv controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent AT trimborns controlsofprimaryproductionintwophytoplanktonbloomsintheantarcticcircumpolarcurrent |