Cargando…

Biomechanical considerations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and insights into prophylactic fixation

PURPOSE: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a deformity of the proximal femur secondary to widened and unstable physis. In stabilising the slip, gold standard treatments stop growth and involve premature physeal closure, which prevents the remodelling of the acquired deformity and creates a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leblanc, E., Bellemore, J. M., Cheng, T., Little, D. G., Birke, O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5421342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548-11-170012
_version_ 1783234570457448448
author Leblanc, E.
Bellemore, J. M.
Cheng, T.
Little, D. G.
Birke, O.
author_facet Leblanc, E.
Bellemore, J. M.
Cheng, T.
Little, D. G.
Birke, O.
author_sort Leblanc, E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a deformity of the proximal femur secondary to widened and unstable physis. In stabilising the slip, gold standard treatments stop growth and involve premature physeal closure, which prevents the remodelling of the acquired deformity and creates a leg length discrepancy that may be significant in younger patients. METHODS: We measured the impact of placing threaded screws across the proximal femoral physis by measuring the centre-trochanteric distance (CTD) and articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD) in participants with or without prophylactic fixation. We then compared the mechanical performance of static (stainless and titanium cannulated Synthes screws) and potentially growing implants (Synthes SCFE screw and Pega Medical Free Gliding screw) in a validated synthetic bone model. RESULTS: In the review of 30 non-fixed and 60 fixated hips over a mean follow-up of 1.9 years, we have noted a significant difference in pre/post CTD and ATD, as well as the change in CTD and ATD over time. In the biomechanical study, the newer implants allowing growth (Synthes SCFE screw and Pega Medical Free Gliding screw) were both shown to be at least non-inferior. CONCLUSIONS: The primary deformity of a SCFE in itself alters hip mechanics. Also, as confirmed in this study, there is a secondary deformity that is created by static fixation and relative trochanteric overgrowth. To help remodel mild deformities and prevent secondary trochanteric overgrowth, growing implants seem to be non-inferior to the more standard means of fixation in static testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5421342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54213422017-05-19 Biomechanical considerations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and insights into prophylactic fixation Leblanc, E. Bellemore, J. M. Cheng, T. Little, D. G. Birke, O. J Child Orthop Original Clinical Articles PURPOSE: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a deformity of the proximal femur secondary to widened and unstable physis. In stabilising the slip, gold standard treatments stop growth and involve premature physeal closure, which prevents the remodelling of the acquired deformity and creates a leg length discrepancy that may be significant in younger patients. METHODS: We measured the impact of placing threaded screws across the proximal femoral physis by measuring the centre-trochanteric distance (CTD) and articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD) in participants with or without prophylactic fixation. We then compared the mechanical performance of static (stainless and titanium cannulated Synthes screws) and potentially growing implants (Synthes SCFE screw and Pega Medical Free Gliding screw) in a validated synthetic bone model. RESULTS: In the review of 30 non-fixed and 60 fixated hips over a mean follow-up of 1.9 years, we have noted a significant difference in pre/post CTD and ATD, as well as the change in CTD and ATD over time. In the biomechanical study, the newer implants allowing growth (Synthes SCFE screw and Pega Medical Free Gliding screw) were both shown to be at least non-inferior. CONCLUSIONS: The primary deformity of a SCFE in itself alters hip mechanics. Also, as confirmed in this study, there is a secondary deformity that is created by static fixation and relative trochanteric overgrowth. To help remodel mild deformities and prevent secondary trochanteric overgrowth, growing implants seem to be non-inferior to the more standard means of fixation in static testing. The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5421342/ /pubmed/28529660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548-11-170012 Text en Copyright © 2017, The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery: All rights reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Articles
Leblanc, E.
Bellemore, J. M.
Cheng, T.
Little, D. G.
Birke, O.
Biomechanical considerations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and insights into prophylactic fixation
title Biomechanical considerations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and insights into prophylactic fixation
title_full Biomechanical considerations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and insights into prophylactic fixation
title_fullStr Biomechanical considerations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and insights into prophylactic fixation
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical considerations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and insights into prophylactic fixation
title_short Biomechanical considerations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and insights into prophylactic fixation
title_sort biomechanical considerations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and insights into prophylactic fixation
topic Original Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5421342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529660
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548-11-170012
work_keys_str_mv AT leblance biomechanicalconsiderationsinslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysisandinsightsintoprophylacticfixation
AT bellemorejm biomechanicalconsiderationsinslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysisandinsightsintoprophylacticfixation
AT chengt biomechanicalconsiderationsinslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysisandinsightsintoprophylacticfixation
AT littledg biomechanicalconsiderationsinslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysisandinsightsintoprophylacticfixation
AT birkeo biomechanicalconsiderationsinslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysisandinsightsintoprophylacticfixation