Cargando…

Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses

Objective To evaluate the impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews. Design Methodological systematic review and reanalyses of meta-analyses. Data sources Medline was searched to identify systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing pharmaceutical tre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Baudard, Marie, Yavchitz, Amélie, Ravaud, Philippe, Perrodeau, Elodie, Boutron, Isabelle
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2017
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5421496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28213479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j448

Ejemplares similares

Reporting of analyses from randomized controlled trials with multiple arms: a systematic review
por: Baron, Gabriel, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
por: Yavchitz, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Meta-analyses including non-randomized studies of therapeutic interventions: a methodological review
por: Faber, Timor, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Impact of searching clinical trials registers in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical and non‐pharmaceutical interventions: Reanalysis of meta‐analyses
por: Alqaidoom, Zainab, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer
por: Créquit, Perrine, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reporting funding source or conflict of interest in abstracts of randomized controlled trials, no evidence of a large impact on general practitioners’ confidence in conclusions, a three-arm randomized controlled trial
por: du Vaure, Céline Buffel, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
por: Bafeta, Aïda, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Impact of single centre status on estimates of intervention effects in trials with continuous outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
por: Bafeta, Aïda, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Timing and Completeness of Trial Results Posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and Published in Journals
por: Riveros, Carolina, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
por: Bafeta, Aïda, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Misrepresentation of Randomized Controlled Trials in Press Releases and News Coverage: A Cohort Study
por: Yavchitz, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Interpretation of health news items reported with or without spin: protocol for a prospective meta-analysis of 16 randomised controlled trials
por: Haneef, Romana, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Applicability and generalisability of the results of systematic reviews to public health practice and policy: a systematic review
por: Ahmad, Nizar, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Applicability and generalisability of published results of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies evaluating four orthopaedic procedures: methodological systematic review
por: Pibouleau, Leslie, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Correction to: Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of “spin” in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients’/caregivers’ interpretation of treatment benefit
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Three randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of “spin” in health news stories reporting studies of pharmacologic treatments on patients’/caregivers’ interpretation of treatment benefit
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bruce, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Quality of Reporting of Bioequivalence Trials Comparing Generic to Brand Name Drugs: A Methodological Systematic Review
por: van der Meersch, Amélie, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Comparative efficacy and safety of second-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Créquit, Perrine, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Dissemination of 2014 dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) trial results: a systematic review of scholarly and media attention over 7 months
por: Sharp, Melissa K, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Correction to: Avoidable waste related to inadequate methods and incomplete reporting of interventions: a systematic review of randomized trials performed in Sub-Saharan Africa
por: Ndounga Diakou, Lee Aymar, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Efficacy of first dose of covid-19 vaccine versus no vaccination on symptoms of patients with long covid: target trial emulation based on ComPaRe e-cohort
por: Tran, Viet-Thi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Variation in severe postpartum hemorrhage management: A national vignette-based study
por: Rousseau, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review
por: Superchi, Cecilia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Methods of Blinding in Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Pharmacologic Treatments: A Systematic Review
por: Boutron, Isabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
por: Pussegoda, Kusala, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Exclusion of patients with concomitant chronic conditions in ongoing randomised controlled trials targeting 10 common chronic conditions and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: a systematic review of registration details
por: Buffel du Vaure, Céline, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparison of serious adverse events posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in corresponding journal articles
por: Tang, Eve, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Designs of trials assessing interventions to improve the peer review process: a vignette-based survey
por: Heim, Amytis, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reporting of harms in oncological clinical study reports submitted to the European Medicines Agency compared to trial registries and publications—a methodological review
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger S., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Development and validation of an instrument to assess treatment adherence for each individual drug taken by a patient
por: Sidorkiewicz, Stéphanie, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Use of wearable biometric monitoring devices to measure outcomes in randomized clinical trials: a methodological systematic review
por: Graña Possamai, Carolina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Assessing the quality of meta-analyses in systematic reviews in pharmaceutical research in Iran by 2016: A systematic review
por: Amanollahi, Alireza, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Methodological Quality Assessment of Budget Impact Analyses for Orphan Drugs: A Systematic Review
por: Abdallah, Khadidja, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Potential workload in applying clinical practice guidelines for patients with chronic conditions and multimorbidity: a systematic analysis
por: Buffel du Vaure, Céline, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_jlj6jkicabfrgdtgut9rsasjt9