Cargando…

College Students’ Knowledge of Recovery Beverage Serving Sizes

Previous research suggests that chocolate milk may be a beneficial recovery beverage, yet little is known about how athletes and students training for careers in sports science or health-related fields interpret recommended recovery beverage serving sizes. This study examined college students’ abili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LEWIS, STEPHANIE, BAXTER, VICTORIA, SPACCAROTELLA, KIM, ANDZEL, WALTER
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Berkeley Electronic Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5421975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515836
_version_ 1783234695026180096
author LEWIS, STEPHANIE
BAXTER, VICTORIA
SPACCAROTELLA, KIM
ANDZEL, WALTER
author_facet LEWIS, STEPHANIE
BAXTER, VICTORIA
SPACCAROTELLA, KIM
ANDZEL, WALTER
author_sort LEWIS, STEPHANIE
collection PubMed
description Previous research suggests that chocolate milk may be a beneficial recovery beverage, yet little is known about how athletes and students training for careers in sports science or health-related fields interpret recommended recovery beverage serving sizes. This study examined college students’ ability to correctly apply serving size recommendations for chocolate milk and protein powder used during post-exercise recovery and assessed usual consumption of milk as a recovery beverage. College students (34 women, 39 men) poured the amount of chocolate milk they would consume within 90 minutes after exercise unaided and with the use of a serving size guide. They scooped the amount of protein powder they would use after exercising. Participants reported consuming about 1.3±1.8 glasses of milk and drinking a recovery beverage besides milk an average of 0.95±1.3 times in the past three days. The majority poured less than recommended. Student athletes poured significantly closer to the recommendation than non-athletes (436±128 ml versus 418±127 ml, p=0.016) and poured significantly closer to the recommendation after reviewing a serving size guide (p=0.038). Athletes and men served themselves significantly more protein powder than non-athletes (13.0±5.6 g versus 10.3±5.2 g, p=0.047) and women (12.5±6.0 g versus 9.8±4.4 g, p=0.041). Most participants reported that the serving size guide was easy to read and helpful. Nutrition education specific to post-exercise recovery beverages may help students improve accuracy when interpreting serving size recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5421975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Berkeley Electronic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54219752017-05-15 College Students’ Knowledge of Recovery Beverage Serving Sizes LEWIS, STEPHANIE BAXTER, VICTORIA SPACCAROTELLA, KIM ANDZEL, WALTER Int J Exerc Sci Original Research Previous research suggests that chocolate milk may be a beneficial recovery beverage, yet little is known about how athletes and students training for careers in sports science or health-related fields interpret recommended recovery beverage serving sizes. This study examined college students’ ability to correctly apply serving size recommendations for chocolate milk and protein powder used during post-exercise recovery and assessed usual consumption of milk as a recovery beverage. College students (34 women, 39 men) poured the amount of chocolate milk they would consume within 90 minutes after exercise unaided and with the use of a serving size guide. They scooped the amount of protein powder they would use after exercising. Participants reported consuming about 1.3±1.8 glasses of milk and drinking a recovery beverage besides milk an average of 0.95±1.3 times in the past three days. The majority poured less than recommended. Student athletes poured significantly closer to the recommendation than non-athletes (436±128 ml versus 418±127 ml, p=0.016) and poured significantly closer to the recommendation after reviewing a serving size guide (p=0.038). Athletes and men served themselves significantly more protein powder than non-athletes (13.0±5.6 g versus 10.3±5.2 g, p=0.047) and women (12.5±6.0 g versus 9.8±4.4 g, p=0.041). Most participants reported that the serving size guide was easy to read and helpful. Nutrition education specific to post-exercise recovery beverages may help students improve accuracy when interpreting serving size recommendations. Berkeley Electronic Press 2017-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5421975/ /pubmed/28515836 Text en
spellingShingle Original Research
LEWIS, STEPHANIE
BAXTER, VICTORIA
SPACCAROTELLA, KIM
ANDZEL, WALTER
College Students’ Knowledge of Recovery Beverage Serving Sizes
title College Students’ Knowledge of Recovery Beverage Serving Sizes
title_full College Students’ Knowledge of Recovery Beverage Serving Sizes
title_fullStr College Students’ Knowledge of Recovery Beverage Serving Sizes
title_full_unstemmed College Students’ Knowledge of Recovery Beverage Serving Sizes
title_short College Students’ Knowledge of Recovery Beverage Serving Sizes
title_sort college students’ knowledge of recovery beverage serving sizes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5421975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28515836
work_keys_str_mv AT lewisstephanie collegestudentsknowledgeofrecoverybeverageservingsizes
AT baxtervictoria collegestudentsknowledgeofrecoverybeverageservingsizes
AT spaccarotellakim collegestudentsknowledgeofrecoverybeverageservingsizes
AT andzelwalter collegestudentsknowledgeofrecoverybeverageservingsizes