Cargando…

Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario

This paper focuses on optimal sensor positioning for monitoring activities of daily living and investigates different combinations of features and models on different sensor positions, i.e., the side of the waist, front of the waist, chest, thigh, head, upper arm, wrist, and ankle. Nineteen features...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pannurat, Natthapon, Thiemjarus, Surapa, Nantajeewarawat, Ekawit, Anantavrasilp, Isara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5422047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28379208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17040774
_version_ 1783234707313393664
author Pannurat, Natthapon
Thiemjarus, Surapa
Nantajeewarawat, Ekawit
Anantavrasilp, Isara
author_facet Pannurat, Natthapon
Thiemjarus, Surapa
Nantajeewarawat, Ekawit
Anantavrasilp, Isara
author_sort Pannurat, Natthapon
collection PubMed
description This paper focuses on optimal sensor positioning for monitoring activities of daily living and investigates different combinations of features and models on different sensor positions, i.e., the side of the waist, front of the waist, chest, thigh, head, upper arm, wrist, and ankle. Nineteen features are extracted, and the feature importance is measured by using the Relief-F feature selection algorithm. Eight classification algorithms are evaluated on a dataset collected from young subjects and a dataset collected from elderly subjects, with two different experimental settings. To deal with different sampling rates, signals with a high data rate are down-sampled and a transformation matrix is used for aligning signals to the same coordinate system. The thigh, chest, side of the waist, and front of the waist are the best four sensor positions for the first dataset (young subjects), with average accuracy values greater than 96%. The best model obtained from the first dataset for the side of the waist is validated on the second dataset (elderly subjects). The most appropriate number of features for each sensor position is reported. The results provide a reference for building activity recognition models for different sensor positions, as well as for data acquired from different hardware platforms and subject groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5422047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54220472017-05-12 Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario Pannurat, Natthapon Thiemjarus, Surapa Nantajeewarawat, Ekawit Anantavrasilp, Isara Sensors (Basel) Article This paper focuses on optimal sensor positioning for monitoring activities of daily living and investigates different combinations of features and models on different sensor positions, i.e., the side of the waist, front of the waist, chest, thigh, head, upper arm, wrist, and ankle. Nineteen features are extracted, and the feature importance is measured by using the Relief-F feature selection algorithm. Eight classification algorithms are evaluated on a dataset collected from young subjects and a dataset collected from elderly subjects, with two different experimental settings. To deal with different sampling rates, signals with a high data rate are down-sampled and a transformation matrix is used for aligning signals to the same coordinate system. The thigh, chest, side of the waist, and front of the waist are the best four sensor positions for the first dataset (young subjects), with average accuracy values greater than 96%. The best model obtained from the first dataset for the side of the waist is validated on the second dataset (elderly subjects). The most appropriate number of features for each sensor position is reported. The results provide a reference for building activity recognition models for different sensor positions, as well as for data acquired from different hardware platforms and subject groups. MDPI 2017-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5422047/ /pubmed/28379208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17040774 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pannurat, Natthapon
Thiemjarus, Surapa
Nantajeewarawat, Ekawit
Anantavrasilp, Isara
Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario
title Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario
title_full Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario
title_fullStr Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario
title_short Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario
title_sort analysis of optimal sensor positions for activity classification and application on a different data collection scenario
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5422047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28379208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17040774
work_keys_str_mv AT pannuratnatthapon analysisofoptimalsensorpositionsforactivityclassificationandapplicationonadifferentdatacollectionscenario
AT thiemjarussurapa analysisofoptimalsensorpositionsforactivityclassificationandapplicationonadifferentdatacollectionscenario
AT nantajeewarawatekawit analysisofoptimalsensorpositionsforactivityclassificationandapplicationonadifferentdatacollectionscenario
AT anantavrasilpisara analysisofoptimalsensorpositionsforactivityclassificationandapplicationonadifferentdatacollectionscenario