Cargando…
Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario
This paper focuses on optimal sensor positioning for monitoring activities of daily living and investigates different combinations of features and models on different sensor positions, i.e., the side of the waist, front of the waist, chest, thigh, head, upper arm, wrist, and ankle. Nineteen features...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5422047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28379208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17040774 |
_version_ | 1783234707313393664 |
---|---|
author | Pannurat, Natthapon Thiemjarus, Surapa Nantajeewarawat, Ekawit Anantavrasilp, Isara |
author_facet | Pannurat, Natthapon Thiemjarus, Surapa Nantajeewarawat, Ekawit Anantavrasilp, Isara |
author_sort | Pannurat, Natthapon |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper focuses on optimal sensor positioning for monitoring activities of daily living and investigates different combinations of features and models on different sensor positions, i.e., the side of the waist, front of the waist, chest, thigh, head, upper arm, wrist, and ankle. Nineteen features are extracted, and the feature importance is measured by using the Relief-F feature selection algorithm. Eight classification algorithms are evaluated on a dataset collected from young subjects and a dataset collected from elderly subjects, with two different experimental settings. To deal with different sampling rates, signals with a high data rate are down-sampled and a transformation matrix is used for aligning signals to the same coordinate system. The thigh, chest, side of the waist, and front of the waist are the best four sensor positions for the first dataset (young subjects), with average accuracy values greater than 96%. The best model obtained from the first dataset for the side of the waist is validated on the second dataset (elderly subjects). The most appropriate number of features for each sensor position is reported. The results provide a reference for building activity recognition models for different sensor positions, as well as for data acquired from different hardware platforms and subject groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5422047 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54220472017-05-12 Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario Pannurat, Natthapon Thiemjarus, Surapa Nantajeewarawat, Ekawit Anantavrasilp, Isara Sensors (Basel) Article This paper focuses on optimal sensor positioning for monitoring activities of daily living and investigates different combinations of features and models on different sensor positions, i.e., the side of the waist, front of the waist, chest, thigh, head, upper arm, wrist, and ankle. Nineteen features are extracted, and the feature importance is measured by using the Relief-F feature selection algorithm. Eight classification algorithms are evaluated on a dataset collected from young subjects and a dataset collected from elderly subjects, with two different experimental settings. To deal with different sampling rates, signals with a high data rate are down-sampled and a transformation matrix is used for aligning signals to the same coordinate system. The thigh, chest, side of the waist, and front of the waist are the best four sensor positions for the first dataset (young subjects), with average accuracy values greater than 96%. The best model obtained from the first dataset for the side of the waist is validated on the second dataset (elderly subjects). The most appropriate number of features for each sensor position is reported. The results provide a reference for building activity recognition models for different sensor positions, as well as for data acquired from different hardware platforms and subject groups. MDPI 2017-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5422047/ /pubmed/28379208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17040774 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pannurat, Natthapon Thiemjarus, Surapa Nantajeewarawat, Ekawit Anantavrasilp, Isara Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario |
title | Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario |
title_full | Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario |
title_short | Analysis of Optimal Sensor Positions for Activity Classification and Application on a Different Data Collection Scenario |
title_sort | analysis of optimal sensor positions for activity classification and application on a different data collection scenario |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5422047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28379208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17040774 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pannuratnatthapon analysisofoptimalsensorpositionsforactivityclassificationandapplicationonadifferentdatacollectionscenario AT thiemjarussurapa analysisofoptimalsensorpositionsforactivityclassificationandapplicationonadifferentdatacollectionscenario AT nantajeewarawatekawit analysisofoptimalsensorpositionsforactivityclassificationandapplicationonadifferentdatacollectionscenario AT anantavrasilpisara analysisofoptimalsensorpositionsforactivityclassificationandapplicationonadifferentdatacollectionscenario |