Cargando…
Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation
PURPOSE: Clinically evaluate a modified applanating surface Goldmann tonometer prism designed to substantially negate errors due to patient variability in biomechanics. METHODS: A modified Goldmann prism with a correcting applanation tonometry surface (CATS) was mathematically optimized to minimize...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5422537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28496302 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S135272 |
_version_ | 1783234801243783168 |
---|---|
author | McCafferty, Sean Lim, Garrett Duncan, William Enikov, Eniko T Schwiegerling, Jim Levine, Jason Kew, Corin |
author_facet | McCafferty, Sean Lim, Garrett Duncan, William Enikov, Eniko T Schwiegerling, Jim Levine, Jason Kew, Corin |
author_sort | McCafferty, Sean |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Clinically evaluate a modified applanating surface Goldmann tonometer prism designed to substantially negate errors due to patient variability in biomechanics. METHODS: A modified Goldmann prism with a correcting applanation tonometry surface (CATS) was mathematically optimized to minimize the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement error due to patient variability in corneal thickness, stiffness, curvature, and tear film adhesion force. A comparative clinical study of 109 eyes measured IOP with CATS and Goldmann prisms. The IOP measurement differences between the CATS and Goldmann prisms were correlated to corneal thickness, hysteresis, and curvature. RESULTS: The CATS tonometer prism in correcting for Goldmann central corneal thickness (CCT) error demonstrated a reduction to <±2 mmHg in 97% of a standard CCT population. This compares to only 54% with CCT error <±2 mmHg using the Goldmann prism. Equal reductions of ~50% in errors due to corneal rigidity and curvature were also demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The results validate the CATS prism’s improved accuracy and expected reduced sensitivity to Goldmann errors without IOP bias as predicted by mathematical modeling. The CATS replacement for the Goldmann prism does not change Goldmann measurement technique or interpretation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5422537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54225372017-05-11 Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation McCafferty, Sean Lim, Garrett Duncan, William Enikov, Eniko T Schwiegerling, Jim Levine, Jason Kew, Corin Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Clinically evaluate a modified applanating surface Goldmann tonometer prism designed to substantially negate errors due to patient variability in biomechanics. METHODS: A modified Goldmann prism with a correcting applanation tonometry surface (CATS) was mathematically optimized to minimize the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement error due to patient variability in corneal thickness, stiffness, curvature, and tear film adhesion force. A comparative clinical study of 109 eyes measured IOP with CATS and Goldmann prisms. The IOP measurement differences between the CATS and Goldmann prisms were correlated to corneal thickness, hysteresis, and curvature. RESULTS: The CATS tonometer prism in correcting for Goldmann central corneal thickness (CCT) error demonstrated a reduction to <±2 mmHg in 97% of a standard CCT population. This compares to only 54% with CCT error <±2 mmHg using the Goldmann prism. Equal reductions of ~50% in errors due to corneal rigidity and curvature were also demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The results validate the CATS prism’s improved accuracy and expected reduced sensitivity to Goldmann errors without IOP bias as predicted by mathematical modeling. The CATS replacement for the Goldmann prism does not change Goldmann measurement technique or interpretation. Dove Medical Press 2017-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5422537/ /pubmed/28496302 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S135272 Text en © 2017 McCafferty et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research McCafferty, Sean Lim, Garrett Duncan, William Enikov, Eniko T Schwiegerling, Jim Levine, Jason Kew, Corin Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation |
title | Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation |
title_full | Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation |
title_fullStr | Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation |
title_short | Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation |
title_sort | goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5422537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28496302 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S135272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccaffertysean goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation AT limgarrett goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation AT duncanwilliam goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation AT enikovenikot goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation AT schwiegerlingjim goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation AT levinejason goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation AT kewcorin goldmanntonometererrorcorrectingprismclinicalevaluation |