Cargando…

Use of botulinum toxin for voiding dysfunction

The use of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) has expanded across a range of lower urinary tract conditions. This review provides an overview of the current indications for BoNT-A in the lower urinary tract and critically evaluates the published evidence within each area. The classic application of BoNT-A h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eldred-Evans, David, Dasgupta, Prokar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5422676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28540231
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.12.05
_version_ 1783234825649389568
author Eldred-Evans, David
Dasgupta, Prokar
author_facet Eldred-Evans, David
Dasgupta, Prokar
author_sort Eldred-Evans, David
collection PubMed
description The use of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) has expanded across a range of lower urinary tract conditions. This review provides an overview of the current indications for BoNT-A in the lower urinary tract and critically evaluates the published evidence within each area. The classic application of BoNT-A has been in the management of refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) and overactive bladder (OAB). There is a large volume of high-quality evidence, including numerous randomized placebo-controlled trials, which demonstrate the efficacy of BoNT-A over a long follow-up period. The culmination of this robust evidence-base has led to onabotulinumtoxin A (onaBoNT-A) receiving regulatory approval as a second-line treatment for NDO at a dose of 200 U and OAB at dose of 100 U. Other applications for BoNT-A are used on an off-license basis and include interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD). These applications are associated with a less mature evidence-base although the literature is rapidly evolving. At present, the results for painful bladder syndrome (PBS) are promising and BoNT-A injections are recommended as a fourth line option in recent international guidelines, although larger randomized study with longer follow-up are required to confirm the initial findings. As a treatment for DSD, BoNT-A injections have shown potential but only in a small number of trials of limited quality. No definite recommendation can be made based on the current evidence. Finally, the results for the treatment of BPH have been variable and recent high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have suggested no benefit over placebo so at present it cannot be recommended for routine clinical practice. Future advances of BoNT-A include liposome encapsulated formulations which are being developed as an alternative to intravesical injections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5422676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54226762017-05-24 Use of botulinum toxin for voiding dysfunction Eldred-Evans, David Dasgupta, Prokar Transl Androl Urol Review Article The use of botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) has expanded across a range of lower urinary tract conditions. This review provides an overview of the current indications for BoNT-A in the lower urinary tract and critically evaluates the published evidence within each area. The classic application of BoNT-A has been in the management of refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) and overactive bladder (OAB). There is a large volume of high-quality evidence, including numerous randomized placebo-controlled trials, which demonstrate the efficacy of BoNT-A over a long follow-up period. The culmination of this robust evidence-base has led to onabotulinumtoxin A (onaBoNT-A) receiving regulatory approval as a second-line treatment for NDO at a dose of 200 U and OAB at dose of 100 U. Other applications for BoNT-A are used on an off-license basis and include interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD). These applications are associated with a less mature evidence-base although the literature is rapidly evolving. At present, the results for painful bladder syndrome (PBS) are promising and BoNT-A injections are recommended as a fourth line option in recent international guidelines, although larger randomized study with longer follow-up are required to confirm the initial findings. As a treatment for DSD, BoNT-A injections have shown potential but only in a small number of trials of limited quality. No definite recommendation can be made based on the current evidence. Finally, the results for the treatment of BPH have been variable and recent high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have suggested no benefit over placebo so at present it cannot be recommended for routine clinical practice. Future advances of BoNT-A include liposome encapsulated formulations which are being developed as an alternative to intravesical injections. AME Publishing Company 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5422676/ /pubmed/28540231 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.12.05 Text en 2017 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Review Article
Eldred-Evans, David
Dasgupta, Prokar
Use of botulinum toxin for voiding dysfunction
title Use of botulinum toxin for voiding dysfunction
title_full Use of botulinum toxin for voiding dysfunction
title_fullStr Use of botulinum toxin for voiding dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Use of botulinum toxin for voiding dysfunction
title_short Use of botulinum toxin for voiding dysfunction
title_sort use of botulinum toxin for voiding dysfunction
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5422676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28540231
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.12.05
work_keys_str_mv AT eldredevansdavid useofbotulinumtoxinforvoidingdysfunction
AT dasguptaprokar useofbotulinumtoxinforvoidingdysfunction