Cargando…

Evaluation of patients with painful total hip arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) – a comparison of semi-quantitative versus 3D volumetric quantitative measurements

BACKGROUND: It was the primary purpose of our study to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of a standardized SPECT/CT algorithm for evaluating patients with painful primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The secondary purpose was a comparison of semi-quantitative and 3D volumetric quan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barthassat, Emilienne, Afifi, Faik, Konala, Praveen, Rasch, Helmut, Hirschmann, Michael T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5422986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28482817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-017-0204-x
_version_ 1783234876780052480
author Barthassat, Emilienne
Afifi, Faik
Konala, Praveen
Rasch, Helmut
Hirschmann, Michael T.
author_facet Barthassat, Emilienne
Afifi, Faik
Konala, Praveen
Rasch, Helmut
Hirschmann, Michael T.
author_sort Barthassat, Emilienne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It was the primary purpose of our study to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of a standardized SPECT/CT algorithm for evaluating patients with painful primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The secondary purpose was a comparison of semi-quantitative and 3D volumetric quantification method for assessment of bone tracer uptake (BTU) in those patients. METHODS: A novel SPECT/CT localization scheme consisting of 14 femoral and 4 acetabular regions on standardized axial and coronal slices was introduced and evaluated in terms of inter- and intra-observer reliability in 37 consecutive patients with hip pain after THA. BTU for each anatomical region was assessed semi-quantitatively using a color-coded Likert type scale (0-10) and volumetrically quantified using a validated software. Two observers interpreted the SPECT/CT findings in all patients two times with six weeks interval between interpretations in random order. Semi-quantitative and quantitative measurements were compared in terms of reliability. In addition, the values were correlated using Pearson`s correlation. A factorial cluster analysis of BTU was performed to identify clinically relevant regions, which should be grouped and analysed together. RESULTS: The localization scheme showed high inter- and intra-observer reliabilities for all femoral and acetabular regions independent of the measurement method used (semiquantitative versus 3D volumetric quantitative measurements). A high to moderate correlation between both measurement methods was shown for the distal femur, the proximal femur and the acetabular cup. The factorial cluster analysis showed that the anatomical regions might be summarized into three distinct anatomical regions. These were the proximal femur, the distal femur and the acetabular cup region. CONCLUSIONS: The SPECT/CT algorithm for assessment of patients with pain after THA is highly reliable independent from the measurement method used. Three clinically relevant anatomical regions (proximal femoral, distal femoral, acetabular) were identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5422986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54229862017-05-12 Evaluation of patients with painful total hip arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) – a comparison of semi-quantitative versus 3D volumetric quantitative measurements Barthassat, Emilienne Afifi, Faik Konala, Praveen Rasch, Helmut Hirschmann, Michael T. BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: It was the primary purpose of our study to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of a standardized SPECT/CT algorithm for evaluating patients with painful primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The secondary purpose was a comparison of semi-quantitative and 3D volumetric quantification method for assessment of bone tracer uptake (BTU) in those patients. METHODS: A novel SPECT/CT localization scheme consisting of 14 femoral and 4 acetabular regions on standardized axial and coronal slices was introduced and evaluated in terms of inter- and intra-observer reliability in 37 consecutive patients with hip pain after THA. BTU for each anatomical region was assessed semi-quantitatively using a color-coded Likert type scale (0-10) and volumetrically quantified using a validated software. Two observers interpreted the SPECT/CT findings in all patients two times with six weeks interval between interpretations in random order. Semi-quantitative and quantitative measurements were compared in terms of reliability. In addition, the values were correlated using Pearson`s correlation. A factorial cluster analysis of BTU was performed to identify clinically relevant regions, which should be grouped and analysed together. RESULTS: The localization scheme showed high inter- and intra-observer reliabilities for all femoral and acetabular regions independent of the measurement method used (semiquantitative versus 3D volumetric quantitative measurements). A high to moderate correlation between both measurement methods was shown for the distal femur, the proximal femur and the acetabular cup. The factorial cluster analysis showed that the anatomical regions might be summarized into three distinct anatomical regions. These were the proximal femur, the distal femur and the acetabular cup region. CONCLUSIONS: The SPECT/CT algorithm for assessment of patients with pain after THA is highly reliable independent from the measurement method used. Three clinically relevant anatomical regions (proximal femoral, distal femoral, acetabular) were identified. BioMed Central 2017-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5422986/ /pubmed/28482817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-017-0204-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barthassat, Emilienne
Afifi, Faik
Konala, Praveen
Rasch, Helmut
Hirschmann, Michael T.
Evaluation of patients with painful total hip arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) – a comparison of semi-quantitative versus 3D volumetric quantitative measurements
title Evaluation of patients with painful total hip arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) – a comparison of semi-quantitative versus 3D volumetric quantitative measurements
title_full Evaluation of patients with painful total hip arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) – a comparison of semi-quantitative versus 3D volumetric quantitative measurements
title_fullStr Evaluation of patients with painful total hip arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) – a comparison of semi-quantitative versus 3D volumetric quantitative measurements
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of patients with painful total hip arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) – a comparison of semi-quantitative versus 3D volumetric quantitative measurements
title_short Evaluation of patients with painful total hip arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) – a comparison of semi-quantitative versus 3D volumetric quantitative measurements
title_sort evaluation of patients with painful total hip arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography (spect/ct) – a comparison of semi-quantitative versus 3d volumetric quantitative measurements
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5422986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28482817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-017-0204-x
work_keys_str_mv AT barthassatemilienne evaluationofpatientswithpainfultotalhiparthroplastyusingcombinedsinglephotonemissiontomographyandconventionalcomputerizedtomographyspectctacomparisonofsemiquantitativeversus3dvolumetricquantitativemeasurements
AT afififaik evaluationofpatientswithpainfultotalhiparthroplastyusingcombinedsinglephotonemissiontomographyandconventionalcomputerizedtomographyspectctacomparisonofsemiquantitativeversus3dvolumetricquantitativemeasurements
AT konalapraveen evaluationofpatientswithpainfultotalhiparthroplastyusingcombinedsinglephotonemissiontomographyandconventionalcomputerizedtomographyspectctacomparisonofsemiquantitativeversus3dvolumetricquantitativemeasurements
AT raschhelmut evaluationofpatientswithpainfultotalhiparthroplastyusingcombinedsinglephotonemissiontomographyandconventionalcomputerizedtomographyspectctacomparisonofsemiquantitativeversus3dvolumetricquantitativemeasurements
AT hirschmannmichaelt evaluationofpatientswithpainfultotalhiparthroplastyusingcombinedsinglephotonemissiontomographyandconventionalcomputerizedtomographyspectctacomparisonofsemiquantitativeversus3dvolumetricquantitativemeasurements