Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators related to the uptake of four strategies to prevent neonatal early-onset group B haemolytic streptococcus disease: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Actions to prevent early onset disease in neonates are based on different strategies including administering antibiotic prophylaxis during labour in case of 1) maternal GBS colonisation (screening strategy), 2) identified risk factors (risk-based strategy) or 3) a combination of these tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolkman, Diny G. E., Fleuren, Margot A. H., Wouters, Maurice G. A. J., de Groot, Christianne J. M., Rijnders, Marlies E. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28486938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1314-8
_version_ 1783234897907810304
author Kolkman, Diny G. E.
Fleuren, Margot A. H.
Wouters, Maurice G. A. J.
de Groot, Christianne J. M.
Rijnders, Marlies E. B.
author_facet Kolkman, Diny G. E.
Fleuren, Margot A. H.
Wouters, Maurice G. A. J.
de Groot, Christianne J. M.
Rijnders, Marlies E. B.
author_sort Kolkman, Diny G. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Actions to prevent early onset disease in neonates are based on different strategies including administering antibiotic prophylaxis during labour in case of 1) maternal GBS colonisation (screening strategy), 2) identified risk factors (risk-based strategy) or 3) a combination of these two conditions (maternal GBS colonisation and identified risk factors: combination strategy and the Dutch guideline). Low adherence to guidelines preventing EOGBS has been reported. Each strategy has drawbacks and clinical outcomes are affected by care providers’ and women’s adherence. The actual impact of any preventive strategy is the product of efficacy of the strategy and the level of implementation. In order to reduce neonatal death due to EOGBS by developing the optimal guideline, we analysed barriers and facilitators of current used strategies. METHODS: Focus group and personal interviews with care providers and women were performed. Impeding and enhancing factors in adherence to the preventive strategies were discussed and scored using the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations (MIDI) and analysed by two independent researchers. RESULTS: Overall, care providers identified 3.6 times more factors that would impede (n = 116) rather than facilitate (n = 32) adherence to the preventive strategies. 28% facilitative factors were reported in relation to the combination strategy and 86% impeding factors in relation to the Dutch guideline. The most preferred strategy was the combination strategy by 74% of the care providers and by 86% of the women. DISCUSSION: We obtained a detailed understanding of factors that influence adherence to preventive strategies. This insight can be used to develop implementation activities to improve the uptake of new strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered in the Dutch Trial Register NTR3965. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1314-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5423122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54231222017-05-10 Barriers and facilitators related to the uptake of four strategies to prevent neonatal early-onset group B haemolytic streptococcus disease: a qualitative study Kolkman, Diny G. E. Fleuren, Margot A. H. Wouters, Maurice G. A. J. de Groot, Christianne J. M. Rijnders, Marlies E. B. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Actions to prevent early onset disease in neonates are based on different strategies including administering antibiotic prophylaxis during labour in case of 1) maternal GBS colonisation (screening strategy), 2) identified risk factors (risk-based strategy) or 3) a combination of these two conditions (maternal GBS colonisation and identified risk factors: combination strategy and the Dutch guideline). Low adherence to guidelines preventing EOGBS has been reported. Each strategy has drawbacks and clinical outcomes are affected by care providers’ and women’s adherence. The actual impact of any preventive strategy is the product of efficacy of the strategy and the level of implementation. In order to reduce neonatal death due to EOGBS by developing the optimal guideline, we analysed barriers and facilitators of current used strategies. METHODS: Focus group and personal interviews with care providers and women were performed. Impeding and enhancing factors in adherence to the preventive strategies were discussed and scored using the Measurement Instrument for Determinants of Innovations (MIDI) and analysed by two independent researchers. RESULTS: Overall, care providers identified 3.6 times more factors that would impede (n = 116) rather than facilitate (n = 32) adherence to the preventive strategies. 28% facilitative factors were reported in relation to the combination strategy and 86% impeding factors in relation to the Dutch guideline. The most preferred strategy was the combination strategy by 74% of the care providers and by 86% of the women. DISCUSSION: We obtained a detailed understanding of factors that influence adherence to preventive strategies. This insight can be used to develop implementation activities to improve the uptake of new strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered in the Dutch Trial Register NTR3965. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1314-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5423122/ /pubmed/28486938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1314-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kolkman, Diny G. E.
Fleuren, Margot A. H.
Wouters, Maurice G. A. J.
de Groot, Christianne J. M.
Rijnders, Marlies E. B.
Barriers and facilitators related to the uptake of four strategies to prevent neonatal early-onset group B haemolytic streptococcus disease: a qualitative study
title Barriers and facilitators related to the uptake of four strategies to prevent neonatal early-onset group B haemolytic streptococcus disease: a qualitative study
title_full Barriers and facilitators related to the uptake of four strategies to prevent neonatal early-onset group B haemolytic streptococcus disease: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators related to the uptake of four strategies to prevent neonatal early-onset group B haemolytic streptococcus disease: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators related to the uptake of four strategies to prevent neonatal early-onset group B haemolytic streptococcus disease: a qualitative study
title_short Barriers and facilitators related to the uptake of four strategies to prevent neonatal early-onset group B haemolytic streptococcus disease: a qualitative study
title_sort barriers and facilitators related to the uptake of four strategies to prevent neonatal early-onset group b haemolytic streptococcus disease: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28486938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1314-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kolkmandinyge barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtotheuptakeoffourstrategiestopreventneonatalearlyonsetgroupbhaemolyticstreptococcusdiseaseaqualitativestudy
AT fleurenmargotah barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtotheuptakeoffourstrategiestopreventneonatalearlyonsetgroupbhaemolyticstreptococcusdiseaseaqualitativestudy
AT woutersmauricegaj barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtotheuptakeoffourstrategiestopreventneonatalearlyonsetgroupbhaemolyticstreptococcusdiseaseaqualitativestudy
AT degrootchristiannejm barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtotheuptakeoffourstrategiestopreventneonatalearlyonsetgroupbhaemolyticstreptococcusdiseaseaqualitativestudy
AT rijndersmarlieseb barriersandfacilitatorsrelatedtotheuptakeoffourstrategiestopreventneonatalearlyonsetgroupbhaemolyticstreptococcusdiseaseaqualitativestudy