Cargando…
In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to compare the cytotoxicity of Reso-Pac and Coe-Pak periodontal dressing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: According to ISO-10993-12:2012, 1-, 3- and 7-day extracts of the two periodontal dressings were prepared in cell culture medium and exposed to the two cult...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Stilus Optimus
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28496963 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2017.8103 |
_version_ | 1783234921426321408 |
---|---|
author | Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi Baghani, Zahra Torshabi, Maryam Basirat, Bahar |
author_facet | Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi Baghani, Zahra Torshabi, Maryam Basirat, Bahar |
author_sort | Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to compare the cytotoxicity of Reso-Pac and Coe-Pak periodontal dressing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: According to ISO-10993-12:2012, 1-, 3- and 7-day extracts of the two periodontal dressings were prepared in cell culture medium and exposed to the two cultured cell lines. Cell viability and proliferation at 24 h and 72 h following exposure were evaluated using quantitative MTT assay. RESULTS: The results showed a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the viability of cells exposed to the 3- and 7-day Coe-Pak extracts at 24 h and 72 h compared to the control group (no exposure to the extract). Reso-Pac extracts slightly decreased cell viability compared to the control group. Understudy materials showed greater cytotoxicity against human osteoblast-like compared to the human gingival fibroblast cells. No significant (P > 0.05) difference was found in the viability of cells exposed to undiluted (100%) one-day extract and diluted (50%) extract of both understudy materials at 24 h and 72 h after exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, Reso-Pac periodontal dressing has less cytotoxicity than Coe-Pak. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5423308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Stilus Optimus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54233082017-05-11 In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi Baghani, Zahra Torshabi, Maryam Basirat, Bahar J Oral Maxillofac Res Original Paper OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to compare the cytotoxicity of Reso-Pac and Coe-Pak periodontal dressing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: According to ISO-10993-12:2012, 1-, 3- and 7-day extracts of the two periodontal dressings were prepared in cell culture medium and exposed to the two cultured cell lines. Cell viability and proliferation at 24 h and 72 h following exposure were evaluated using quantitative MTT assay. RESULTS: The results showed a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the viability of cells exposed to the 3- and 7-day Coe-Pak extracts at 24 h and 72 h compared to the control group (no exposure to the extract). Reso-Pac extracts slightly decreased cell viability compared to the control group. Understudy materials showed greater cytotoxicity against human osteoblast-like compared to the human gingival fibroblast cells. No significant (P > 0.05) difference was found in the viability of cells exposed to undiluted (100%) one-day extract and diluted (50%) extract of both understudy materials at 24 h and 72 h after exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, Reso-Pac periodontal dressing has less cytotoxicity than Coe-Pak. Stilus Optimus 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5423308/ /pubmed/28496963 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2017.8103 Text en Copyright © Kadkhodazadeh M, Baghani Z, Torshabi M, Basirat B. Published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH (http://www.ejomr.org), 31 March 2017. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article, first published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 UnportedLicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work and is properly cited. The copyright, license information and link to the original publication on (http://www.ejomr.org) must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi Baghani, Zahra Torshabi, Maryam Basirat, Bahar In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings |
title | In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings |
title_full | In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings |
title_fullStr | In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings |
title_short | In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings |
title_sort | in vitro comparison of biological effects of coe-pak and reso-pac periodontal dressings |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28496963 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2017.8103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kadkhodazadehmahdi invitrocomparisonofbiologicaleffectsofcoepakandresopacperiodontaldressings AT baghanizahra invitrocomparisonofbiologicaleffectsofcoepakandresopacperiodontaldressings AT torshabimaryam invitrocomparisonofbiologicaleffectsofcoepakandresopacperiodontaldressings AT basiratbahar invitrocomparisonofbiologicaleffectsofcoepakandresopacperiodontaldressings |