Cargando…

In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to compare the cytotoxicity of Reso-Pac and Coe-Pak periodontal dressing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: According to ISO-10993-12:2012, 1-, 3- and 7-day extracts of the two periodontal dressings were prepared in cell culture medium and exposed to the two cult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi, Baghani, Zahra, Torshabi, Maryam, Basirat, Bahar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Stilus Optimus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28496963
http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2017.8103
_version_ 1783234921426321408
author Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi
Baghani, Zahra
Torshabi, Maryam
Basirat, Bahar
author_facet Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi
Baghani, Zahra
Torshabi, Maryam
Basirat, Bahar
author_sort Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to compare the cytotoxicity of Reso-Pac and Coe-Pak periodontal dressing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: According to ISO-10993-12:2012, 1-, 3- and 7-day extracts of the two periodontal dressings were prepared in cell culture medium and exposed to the two cultured cell lines. Cell viability and proliferation at 24 h and 72 h following exposure were evaluated using quantitative MTT assay. RESULTS: The results showed a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the viability of cells exposed to the 3- and 7-day Coe-Pak extracts at 24 h and 72 h compared to the control group (no exposure to the extract). Reso-Pac extracts slightly decreased cell viability compared to the control group. Understudy materials showed greater cytotoxicity against human osteoblast-like compared to the human gingival fibroblast cells. No significant (P > 0.05) difference was found in the viability of cells exposed to undiluted (100%) one-day extract and diluted (50%) extract of both understudy materials at 24 h and 72 h after exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, Reso-Pac periodontal dressing has less cytotoxicity than Coe-Pak.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5423308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Stilus Optimus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54233082017-05-11 In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi Baghani, Zahra Torshabi, Maryam Basirat, Bahar J Oral Maxillofac Res Original Paper OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to compare the cytotoxicity of Reso-Pac and Coe-Pak periodontal dressing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: According to ISO-10993-12:2012, 1-, 3- and 7-day extracts of the two periodontal dressings were prepared in cell culture medium and exposed to the two cultured cell lines. Cell viability and proliferation at 24 h and 72 h following exposure were evaluated using quantitative MTT assay. RESULTS: The results showed a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the viability of cells exposed to the 3- and 7-day Coe-Pak extracts at 24 h and 72 h compared to the control group (no exposure to the extract). Reso-Pac extracts slightly decreased cell viability compared to the control group. Understudy materials showed greater cytotoxicity against human osteoblast-like compared to the human gingival fibroblast cells. No significant (P > 0.05) difference was found in the viability of cells exposed to undiluted (100%) one-day extract and diluted (50%) extract of both understudy materials at 24 h and 72 h after exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, Reso-Pac periodontal dressing has less cytotoxicity than Coe-Pak. Stilus Optimus 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5423308/ /pubmed/28496963 http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2017.8103 Text en Copyright © Kadkhodazadeh M, Baghani Z, Torshabi M, Basirat B. Published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH (http://www.ejomr.org), 31 March 2017. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article, first published in the JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL RESEARCH, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 UnportedLicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work and is properly cited. The copyright, license information and link to the original publication on (http://www.ejomr.org) must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi
Baghani, Zahra
Torshabi, Maryam
Basirat, Bahar
In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings
title In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings
title_full In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings
title_fullStr In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings
title_short In Vitro Comparison of Biological Effects of Coe-Pak and Reso-Pac Periodontal Dressings
title_sort in vitro comparison of biological effects of coe-pak and reso-pac periodontal dressings
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28496963
http://dx.doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2017.8103
work_keys_str_mv AT kadkhodazadehmahdi invitrocomparisonofbiologicaleffectsofcoepakandresopacperiodontaldressings
AT baghanizahra invitrocomparisonofbiologicaleffectsofcoepakandresopacperiodontaldressings
AT torshabimaryam invitrocomparisonofbiologicaleffectsofcoepakandresopacperiodontaldressings
AT basiratbahar invitrocomparisonofbiologicaleffectsofcoepakandresopacperiodontaldressings