Cargando…
Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods?
Background: 1(st) and 2(nd) generation cephalosporins used for perioperative prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery do not cover non-fermenting Gram-negative rods (NFR). Methods: Epidemiological cohort study of adult patients operated for orthopedic infections between 2004 and 2014 with perioperative ce...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529866 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.17171 |
_version_ | 1783234972172156928 |
---|---|
author | Jamei, Omid Gjoni, Shpresa Zenelaj, Besa Kressmann, Benjamin Belaieff, Wilson Hannouche, Didier Uçkay, Ilker |
author_facet | Jamei, Omid Gjoni, Shpresa Zenelaj, Besa Kressmann, Benjamin Belaieff, Wilson Hannouche, Didier Uçkay, Ilker |
author_sort | Jamei, Omid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: 1(st) and 2(nd) generation cephalosporins used for perioperative prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery do not cover non-fermenting Gram-negative rods (NFR). Methods: Epidemiological cohort study of adult patients operated for orthopedic infections between 2004 and 2014 with perioperative cefuroxim or vancomycin prophylaxis. Exclusion of polyneuropathic ischemic foot infections and septic bursitis cases. Results: Of the total 1840 surgical procedures in the study, 430 grew Gram-negative pathogens (23%), of which 194 (11%) were due to NFR and 143 (8%) to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Overall, 634 episodes (35%) involved orthopaedic implants (321 arthroplasties, 135 plates, 53 nails, and others). In multivariate analysis and group comparisons, especially preoperative antibiotic use (124/194 vs. 531/1456; p<0.01) was significantly associated with NFR. Conclusions: Overall proportion of NFR oscillated between 9% and 13% among our orthopaedic infections. Variables associated with NFR were antibiotic use prior to hospitalization. The low infection rate of NFR following elective surgery and the community-based epidemiology, has led us to keep our standard perioperative prophylaxis unchanged. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5423579 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54235792017-05-19 Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods? Jamei, Omid Gjoni, Shpresa Zenelaj, Besa Kressmann, Benjamin Belaieff, Wilson Hannouche, Didier Uçkay, Ilker J Bone Jt Infect Research Paper Background: 1(st) and 2(nd) generation cephalosporins used for perioperative prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery do not cover non-fermenting Gram-negative rods (NFR). Methods: Epidemiological cohort study of adult patients operated for orthopedic infections between 2004 and 2014 with perioperative cefuroxim or vancomycin prophylaxis. Exclusion of polyneuropathic ischemic foot infections and septic bursitis cases. Results: Of the total 1840 surgical procedures in the study, 430 grew Gram-negative pathogens (23%), of which 194 (11%) were due to NFR and 143 (8%) to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Overall, 634 episodes (35%) involved orthopaedic implants (321 arthroplasties, 135 plates, 53 nails, and others). In multivariate analysis and group comparisons, especially preoperative antibiotic use (124/194 vs. 531/1456; p<0.01) was significantly associated with NFR. Conclusions: Overall proportion of NFR oscillated between 9% and 13% among our orthopaedic infections. Variables associated with NFR were antibiotic use prior to hospitalization. The low infection rate of NFR following elective surgery and the community-based epidemiology, has led us to keep our standard perioperative prophylaxis unchanged. Ivyspring International Publisher 2017-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5423579/ /pubmed/28529866 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.17171 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Jamei, Omid Gjoni, Shpresa Zenelaj, Besa Kressmann, Benjamin Belaieff, Wilson Hannouche, Didier Uçkay, Ilker Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods? |
title | Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods? |
title_full | Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods? |
title_fullStr | Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods? |
title_short | Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods? |
title_sort | which orthopaedic patients are infected with gram-negative non-fermenting rods? |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529866 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.17171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jameiomid whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods AT gjonishpresa whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods AT zenelajbesa whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods AT kressmannbenjamin whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods AT belaieffwilson whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods AT hannouchedidier whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods AT uckayilker whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods |