Cargando…

Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods?

Background: 1(st) and 2(nd) generation cephalosporins used for perioperative prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery do not cover non-fermenting Gram-negative rods (NFR). Methods: Epidemiological cohort study of adult patients operated for orthopedic infections between 2004 and 2014 with perioperative ce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamei, Omid, Gjoni, Shpresa, Zenelaj, Besa, Kressmann, Benjamin, Belaieff, Wilson, Hannouche, Didier, Uçkay, Ilker
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529866
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.17171
_version_ 1783234972172156928
author Jamei, Omid
Gjoni, Shpresa
Zenelaj, Besa
Kressmann, Benjamin
Belaieff, Wilson
Hannouche, Didier
Uçkay, Ilker
author_facet Jamei, Omid
Gjoni, Shpresa
Zenelaj, Besa
Kressmann, Benjamin
Belaieff, Wilson
Hannouche, Didier
Uçkay, Ilker
author_sort Jamei, Omid
collection PubMed
description Background: 1(st) and 2(nd) generation cephalosporins used for perioperative prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery do not cover non-fermenting Gram-negative rods (NFR). Methods: Epidemiological cohort study of adult patients operated for orthopedic infections between 2004 and 2014 with perioperative cefuroxim or vancomycin prophylaxis. Exclusion of polyneuropathic ischemic foot infections and septic bursitis cases. Results: Of the total 1840 surgical procedures in the study, 430 grew Gram-negative pathogens (23%), of which 194 (11%) were due to NFR and 143 (8%) to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Overall, 634 episodes (35%) involved orthopaedic implants (321 arthroplasties, 135 plates, 53 nails, and others). In multivariate analysis and group comparisons, especially preoperative antibiotic use (124/194 vs. 531/1456; p<0.01) was significantly associated with NFR. Conclusions: Overall proportion of NFR oscillated between 9% and 13% among our orthopaedic infections. Variables associated with NFR were antibiotic use prior to hospitalization. The low infection rate of NFR following elective surgery and the community-based epidemiology, has led us to keep our standard perioperative prophylaxis unchanged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5423579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54235792017-05-19 Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods? Jamei, Omid Gjoni, Shpresa Zenelaj, Besa Kressmann, Benjamin Belaieff, Wilson Hannouche, Didier Uçkay, Ilker J Bone Jt Infect Research Paper Background: 1(st) and 2(nd) generation cephalosporins used for perioperative prophylaxis in orthopaedic surgery do not cover non-fermenting Gram-negative rods (NFR). Methods: Epidemiological cohort study of adult patients operated for orthopedic infections between 2004 and 2014 with perioperative cefuroxim or vancomycin prophylaxis. Exclusion of polyneuropathic ischemic foot infections and septic bursitis cases. Results: Of the total 1840 surgical procedures in the study, 430 grew Gram-negative pathogens (23%), of which 194 (11%) were due to NFR and 143 (8%) to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Overall, 634 episodes (35%) involved orthopaedic implants (321 arthroplasties, 135 plates, 53 nails, and others). In multivariate analysis and group comparisons, especially preoperative antibiotic use (124/194 vs. 531/1456; p<0.01) was significantly associated with NFR. Conclusions: Overall proportion of NFR oscillated between 9% and 13% among our orthopaedic infections. Variables associated with NFR were antibiotic use prior to hospitalization. The low infection rate of NFR following elective surgery and the community-based epidemiology, has led us to keep our standard perioperative prophylaxis unchanged. Ivyspring International Publisher 2017-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5423579/ /pubmed/28529866 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.17171 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Jamei, Omid
Gjoni, Shpresa
Zenelaj, Besa
Kressmann, Benjamin
Belaieff, Wilson
Hannouche, Didier
Uçkay, Ilker
Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods?
title Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods?
title_full Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods?
title_fullStr Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods?
title_full_unstemmed Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods?
title_short Which Orthopaedic Patients Are Infected with Gram-negative Non-fermenting Rods?
title_sort which orthopaedic patients are infected with gram-negative non-fermenting rods?
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28529866
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jbji.17171
work_keys_str_mv AT jameiomid whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods
AT gjonishpresa whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods
AT zenelajbesa whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods
AT kressmannbenjamin whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods
AT belaieffwilson whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods
AT hannouchedidier whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods
AT uckayilker whichorthopaedicpatientsareinfectedwithgramnegativenonfermentingrods