Cargando…

Identifying biologically relevant putative mechanisms in a given phenotype comparison

A major challenge in life science research is understanding the mechanism involved in a given phenotype. The ability to identify the correct mechanisms is needed in order to understand fundamental and very important phenomena such as mechanisms of disease, immune systems responses to various challen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanoudi, Samer, Donato, Michele, Draghici, Sorin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28486531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176950
_version_ 1783234980904697856
author Hanoudi, Samer
Donato, Michele
Draghici, Sorin
author_facet Hanoudi, Samer
Donato, Michele
Draghici, Sorin
author_sort Hanoudi, Samer
collection PubMed
description A major challenge in life science research is understanding the mechanism involved in a given phenotype. The ability to identify the correct mechanisms is needed in order to understand fundamental and very important phenomena such as mechanisms of disease, immune systems responses to various challenges, and mechanisms of drug action. The current data analysis methods focus on the identification of the differentially expressed (DE) genes using their fold change and/or p-values. Major shortcomings of this approach are that: i) it does not consider the interactions between genes; ii) its results are sensitive to the selection of the threshold(s) used, and iii) the set of genes produced by this approach is not always conducive to formulating mechanistic hypotheses. Here we present a method that can construct networks of genes that can be considered putative mechanisms. The putative mechanisms constructed by this approach are not limited to the set of DE genes, but also considers all known and relevant gene-gene interactions. We analyzed three real datasets for which both the causes of the phenotype, as well as the true mechanisms were known. We show that the method identified the correct mechanisms when applied on microarray datasets from mouse. We compared the results of our method with the results of the classical approach, showing that our method produces more meaningful biological insights.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5423614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54236142017-05-15 Identifying biologically relevant putative mechanisms in a given phenotype comparison Hanoudi, Samer Donato, Michele Draghici, Sorin PLoS One Research Article A major challenge in life science research is understanding the mechanism involved in a given phenotype. The ability to identify the correct mechanisms is needed in order to understand fundamental and very important phenomena such as mechanisms of disease, immune systems responses to various challenges, and mechanisms of drug action. The current data analysis methods focus on the identification of the differentially expressed (DE) genes using their fold change and/or p-values. Major shortcomings of this approach are that: i) it does not consider the interactions between genes; ii) its results are sensitive to the selection of the threshold(s) used, and iii) the set of genes produced by this approach is not always conducive to formulating mechanistic hypotheses. Here we present a method that can construct networks of genes that can be considered putative mechanisms. The putative mechanisms constructed by this approach are not limited to the set of DE genes, but also considers all known and relevant gene-gene interactions. We analyzed three real datasets for which both the causes of the phenotype, as well as the true mechanisms were known. We show that the method identified the correct mechanisms when applied on microarray datasets from mouse. We compared the results of our method with the results of the classical approach, showing that our method produces more meaningful biological insights. Public Library of Science 2017-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5423614/ /pubmed/28486531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176950 Text en © 2017 Hanoudi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hanoudi, Samer
Donato, Michele
Draghici, Sorin
Identifying biologically relevant putative mechanisms in a given phenotype comparison
title Identifying biologically relevant putative mechanisms in a given phenotype comparison
title_full Identifying biologically relevant putative mechanisms in a given phenotype comparison
title_fullStr Identifying biologically relevant putative mechanisms in a given phenotype comparison
title_full_unstemmed Identifying biologically relevant putative mechanisms in a given phenotype comparison
title_short Identifying biologically relevant putative mechanisms in a given phenotype comparison
title_sort identifying biologically relevant putative mechanisms in a given phenotype comparison
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28486531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176950
work_keys_str_mv AT hanoudisamer identifyingbiologicallyrelevantputativemechanismsinagivenphenotypecomparison
AT donatomichele identifyingbiologicallyrelevantputativemechanismsinagivenphenotypecomparison
AT draghicisorin identifyingbiologicallyrelevantputativemechanismsinagivenphenotypecomparison