Cargando…

Detection and differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in clinical samples through PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis

Amebiasis is one of the twenty major causes of disease in Mexico; however, the diagnosis is difficult due to limitations of conventional microscopy-based techniques. In this study, we analyzed stool samples using polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) to differe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López-López, P., Martínez-López, M.C., Boldo-León, X.M., Hernández-Díaz, Y., González-Castro, T.B., Tovilla-Zárate, C.A., Luna-Arias, J.P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28380216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20175997
_version_ 1783235004672770048
author López-López, P.
Martínez-López, M.C.
Boldo-León, X.M.
Hernández-Díaz, Y.
González-Castro, T.B.
Tovilla-Zárate, C.A.
Luna-Arias, J.P.
author_facet López-López, P.
Martínez-López, M.C.
Boldo-León, X.M.
Hernández-Díaz, Y.
González-Castro, T.B.
Tovilla-Zárate, C.A.
Luna-Arias, J.P.
author_sort López-López, P.
collection PubMed
description Amebiasis is one of the twenty major causes of disease in Mexico; however, the diagnosis is difficult due to limitations of conventional microscopy-based techniques. In this study, we analyzed stool samples using polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) to differentiate between Entamoeba histolytica (pathogenic) and E. dispar (non-pathogenic). The target for the PCR amplification was a small region (228 bp) of the adh112 gene selected to increase the sensitivity of the test. The study involved 62 stool samples that were collected from individuals with complaints of gastrointestinal discomfort. Of the 62 samples, 10 (16.1%) were positive for E. histolytica while 52 (83.9%) were negative. No sample was positive for E. dispar. These results were validated by nested PCR-RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) and suggest that PCR-DGGE is a promising tool to differentiate among Entamoeba infections, contributing to determine the specific treatment for patients infected with E. histolytica, and therefore, avoiding unnecessary treatment of patients infected with the non-pathogenic E. dispar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5423754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54237542017-05-24 Detection and differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in clinical samples through PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis López-López, P. Martínez-López, M.C. Boldo-León, X.M. Hernández-Díaz, Y. González-Castro, T.B. Tovilla-Zárate, C.A. Luna-Arias, J.P. Braz J Med Biol Res Biomedical Sciences Amebiasis is one of the twenty major causes of disease in Mexico; however, the diagnosis is difficult due to limitations of conventional microscopy-based techniques. In this study, we analyzed stool samples using polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) to differentiate between Entamoeba histolytica (pathogenic) and E. dispar (non-pathogenic). The target for the PCR amplification was a small region (228 bp) of the adh112 gene selected to increase the sensitivity of the test. The study involved 62 stool samples that were collected from individuals with complaints of gastrointestinal discomfort. Of the 62 samples, 10 (16.1%) were positive for E. histolytica while 52 (83.9%) were negative. No sample was positive for E. dispar. These results were validated by nested PCR-RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) and suggest that PCR-DGGE is a promising tool to differentiate among Entamoeba infections, contributing to determine the specific treatment for patients infected with E. histolytica, and therefore, avoiding unnecessary treatment of patients infected with the non-pathogenic E. dispar. Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2017-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5423754/ /pubmed/28380216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20175997 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Biomedical Sciences
López-López, P.
Martínez-López, M.C.
Boldo-León, X.M.
Hernández-Díaz, Y.
González-Castro, T.B.
Tovilla-Zárate, C.A.
Luna-Arias, J.P.
Detection and differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in clinical samples through PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
title Detection and differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in clinical samples through PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
title_full Detection and differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in clinical samples through PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
title_fullStr Detection and differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in clinical samples through PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
title_full_unstemmed Detection and differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in clinical samples through PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
title_short Detection and differentiation of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in clinical samples through PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
title_sort detection and differentiation of entamoeba histolytica and entamoeba dispar in clinical samples through pcr-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
topic Biomedical Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5423754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28380216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20175997
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezlopezp detectionanddifferentiationofentamoebahistolyticaandentamoebadisparinclinicalsamplesthroughpcrdenaturinggradientgelelectrophoresis
AT martinezlopezmc detectionanddifferentiationofentamoebahistolyticaandentamoebadisparinclinicalsamplesthroughpcrdenaturinggradientgelelectrophoresis
AT boldoleonxm detectionanddifferentiationofentamoebahistolyticaandentamoebadisparinclinicalsamplesthroughpcrdenaturinggradientgelelectrophoresis
AT hernandezdiazy detectionanddifferentiationofentamoebahistolyticaandentamoebadisparinclinicalsamplesthroughpcrdenaturinggradientgelelectrophoresis
AT gonzalezcastrotb detectionanddifferentiationofentamoebahistolyticaandentamoebadisparinclinicalsamplesthroughpcrdenaturinggradientgelelectrophoresis
AT tovillazarateca detectionanddifferentiationofentamoebahistolyticaandentamoebadisparinclinicalsamplesthroughpcrdenaturinggradientgelelectrophoresis
AT lunaariasjp detectionanddifferentiationofentamoebahistolyticaandentamoebadisparinclinicalsamplesthroughpcrdenaturinggradientgelelectrophoresis