Cargando…
Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice
BACKGROUND: The transfer of multiple embryos after in vitro fertilization (IVF) increases the risk of twins and higher-order births. Multiple births are associated with significant health risks and maternal and neonatal complications, as well as physical, emotional, and financial stresses that can s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-016-0024-7 |
_version_ | 1783235104886226944 |
---|---|
author | Tobias, Tamara Sharara, Fady I. Franasiak, Jason M. Heiser, Patrick W. Pinckney-Clark, Emily |
author_facet | Tobias, Tamara Sharara, Fady I. Franasiak, Jason M. Heiser, Patrick W. Pinckney-Clark, Emily |
author_sort | Tobias, Tamara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The transfer of multiple embryos after in vitro fertilization (IVF) increases the risk of twins and higher-order births. Multiple births are associated with significant health risks and maternal and neonatal complications, as well as physical, emotional, and financial stresses that can strain families and increase the incidence of depression and anxiety disorders in parents. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) is among the most effective methods to reduce the risk of multiple births with IVF. MAIN BODY: Current societal guidelines recommend eSET for patients <35 years of age with a good prognosis, yet even this approach is not widely applied. Many patients and clinicians have been reluctant to adopt eSET due to studies reporting higher live birth rates with the transfer of two or more embryos rather than eSET. Additional barriers to eSET include risk of treatment dropout after embryo transfer failure, patient preference for twins, a lack of knowledge about the risks and complications associated with multiple births, and the high costs of multiple IVF cycles. This review provides a comprehensive summary of strategies to increase the rate of eSET, including personalized counseling, access to educational information regarding the risks of multiple pregnancies and births, financial incentives, and tools to help predict the chances of IVF success. The use of comprehensive chromosomal screening to improve embryo selection has been shown to improve eSET outcomes and may increase acceptance of eSET. CONCLUSIONS: eSET is an effective method for reducing multiple pregnancies resulting from IVF. Although several factors may impede the adoption of eSET, there are a number of strategies and tools that may encourage the more widespread adoption of eSET in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5424309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54243092017-06-15 Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice Tobias, Tamara Sharara, Fady I. Franasiak, Jason M. Heiser, Patrick W. Pinckney-Clark, Emily Fertil Res Pract Review BACKGROUND: The transfer of multiple embryos after in vitro fertilization (IVF) increases the risk of twins and higher-order births. Multiple births are associated with significant health risks and maternal and neonatal complications, as well as physical, emotional, and financial stresses that can strain families and increase the incidence of depression and anxiety disorders in parents. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) is among the most effective methods to reduce the risk of multiple births with IVF. MAIN BODY: Current societal guidelines recommend eSET for patients <35 years of age with a good prognosis, yet even this approach is not widely applied. Many patients and clinicians have been reluctant to adopt eSET due to studies reporting higher live birth rates with the transfer of two or more embryos rather than eSET. Additional barriers to eSET include risk of treatment dropout after embryo transfer failure, patient preference for twins, a lack of knowledge about the risks and complications associated with multiple births, and the high costs of multiple IVF cycles. This review provides a comprehensive summary of strategies to increase the rate of eSET, including personalized counseling, access to educational information regarding the risks of multiple pregnancies and births, financial incentives, and tools to help predict the chances of IVF success. The use of comprehensive chromosomal screening to improve embryo selection has been shown to improve eSET outcomes and may increase acceptance of eSET. CONCLUSIONS: eSET is an effective method for reducing multiple pregnancies resulting from IVF. Although several factors may impede the adoption of eSET, there are a number of strategies and tools that may encourage the more widespread adoption of eSET in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2016-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5424309/ /pubmed/28620526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-016-0024-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Tobias, Tamara Sharara, Fady I. Franasiak, Jason M. Heiser, Patrick W. Pinckney-Clark, Emily Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice |
title | Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice |
title_full | Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice |
title_short | Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice |
title_sort | promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-016-0024-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tobiastamara promotingtheuseofelectivesingleembryotransferinclinicalpractice AT shararafadyi promotingtheuseofelectivesingleembryotransferinclinicalpractice AT franasiakjasonm promotingtheuseofelectivesingleembryotransferinclinicalpractice AT heiserpatrickw promotingtheuseofelectivesingleembryotransferinclinicalpractice AT pinckneyclarkemily promotingtheuseofelectivesingleembryotransferinclinicalpractice |