Cargando…

A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy

BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is an important procedure for in vitro fertilization (IVF). A key step of PGS, blastomere removal, is abundant with many technical issues. The aim of this study was to compare a more simple procedure based on the Stipper Micropipetter, named S-biop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cedillo, Luciano, Ocampo-Bárcenas, Azucena, Maldonado, Israel, Valdez-Morales, Francisco J., Camargo, Felipe, López-Bayghen, Esther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4
_version_ 1783235126478503936
author Cedillo, Luciano
Ocampo-Bárcenas, Azucena
Maldonado, Israel
Valdez-Morales, Francisco J.
Camargo, Felipe
López-Bayghen, Esther
author_facet Cedillo, Luciano
Ocampo-Bárcenas, Azucena
Maldonado, Israel
Valdez-Morales, Francisco J.
Camargo, Felipe
López-Bayghen, Esther
author_sort Cedillo, Luciano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is an important procedure for in vitro fertilization (IVF). A key step of PGS, blastomere removal, is abundant with many technical issues. The aim of this study was to compare a more simple procedure based on the Stipper Micropipetter, named S-biopsy, to the conventional aspiration method. METHODS: On Day 3, 368 high-quality embryos (>7 cells on Day3 with <10% fragmentation) were collected from 38 women. For each patient, their embryos were equally separated between the conventional method (n = 188) and S-biopsy method (n = 180). The conventional method was performed using a standardized protocol. For the S-biopsy method, a laser was used to remove a significantly smaller portion of the zona pellucida. Afterwards, the complete embryo was aspirated with a Stripper Micropipetter, forcing the removal of the blastomere. Selected blastomeres went to PGS using CGH microarrays. Embryo integrity and blastocyst formation were assessed on Day 5. Differences between groups were assessed by either the Mann-Whitney test or Fisher Exact test. RESULTS: Both methods resulted in the removal of only one blastomere. The S-biopsy and the conventional method did not differ in terms of affecting embryo integrity (95.0% vs. 95.7%) or blastocyst formation (72.7% vs. 70.7%). PGS analysis indicated that aneuploidy rate were similar between the two methods (63.1% vs. 65.2%). However, the time required to perform the S-biopsy method (179.2 ± 17.5 s) was significantly shorter (5-fold) than the conventional method. CONCLUSION: The S-biopsy method is comparable to the conventional method that is used to remove a blastomere for PGS, but requires less time. Furthermore, due to the simplicity of the S-biopsy technique, this method is more ideal for IVF laboratories. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5424395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54243952017-06-15 A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy Cedillo, Luciano Ocampo-Bárcenas, Azucena Maldonado, Israel Valdez-Morales, Francisco J. Camargo, Felipe López-Bayghen, Esther Fertil Res Pract Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is an important procedure for in vitro fertilization (IVF). A key step of PGS, blastomere removal, is abundant with many technical issues. The aim of this study was to compare a more simple procedure based on the Stipper Micropipetter, named S-biopsy, to the conventional aspiration method. METHODS: On Day 3, 368 high-quality embryos (>7 cells on Day3 with <10% fragmentation) were collected from 38 women. For each patient, their embryos were equally separated between the conventional method (n = 188) and S-biopsy method (n = 180). The conventional method was performed using a standardized protocol. For the S-biopsy method, a laser was used to remove a significantly smaller portion of the zona pellucida. Afterwards, the complete embryo was aspirated with a Stripper Micropipetter, forcing the removal of the blastomere. Selected blastomeres went to PGS using CGH microarrays. Embryo integrity and blastocyst formation were assessed on Day 5. Differences between groups were assessed by either the Mann-Whitney test or Fisher Exact test. RESULTS: Both methods resulted in the removal of only one blastomere. The S-biopsy and the conventional method did not differ in terms of affecting embryo integrity (95.0% vs. 95.7%) or blastocyst formation (72.7% vs. 70.7%). PGS analysis indicated that aneuploidy rate were similar between the two methods (63.1% vs. 65.2%). However, the time required to perform the S-biopsy method (179.2 ± 17.5 s) was significantly shorter (5-fold) than the conventional method. CONCLUSION: The S-biopsy method is comparable to the conventional method that is used to remove a blastomere for PGS, but requires less time. Furthermore, due to the simplicity of the S-biopsy technique, this method is more ideal for IVF laboratories. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5424395/ /pubmed/28620540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Cedillo, Luciano
Ocampo-Bárcenas, Azucena
Maldonado, Israel
Valdez-Morales, Francisco J.
Camargo, Felipe
López-Bayghen, Esther
A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy
title A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy
title_full A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy
title_fullStr A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy
title_full_unstemmed A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy
title_short A simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy
title_sort simple, less invasive stripper micropipetter-based technique for day 3 embryo biopsy
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-016-0027-4
work_keys_str_mv AT cedilloluciano asimplelessinvasivestrippermicropipetterbasedtechniqueforday3embryobiopsy
AT ocampobarcenasazucena asimplelessinvasivestrippermicropipetterbasedtechniqueforday3embryobiopsy
AT maldonadoisrael asimplelessinvasivestrippermicropipetterbasedtechniqueforday3embryobiopsy
AT valdezmoralesfranciscoj asimplelessinvasivestrippermicropipetterbasedtechniqueforday3embryobiopsy
AT camargofelipe asimplelessinvasivestrippermicropipetterbasedtechniqueforday3embryobiopsy
AT lopezbayghenesther asimplelessinvasivestrippermicropipetterbasedtechniqueforday3embryobiopsy
AT cedilloluciano simplelessinvasivestrippermicropipetterbasedtechniqueforday3embryobiopsy
AT ocampobarcenasazucena simplelessinvasivestrippermicropipetterbasedtechniqueforday3embryobiopsy
AT maldonadoisrael simplelessinvasivestrippermicropipetterbasedtechniqueforday3embryobiopsy
AT valdezmoralesfranciscoj simplelessinvasivestrippermicropipetterbasedtechniqueforday3embryobiopsy
AT camargofelipe simplelessinvasivestrippermicropipetterbasedtechniqueforday3embryobiopsy
AT lopezbayghenesther simplelessinvasivestrippermicropipetterbasedtechniqueforday3embryobiopsy