Cargando…
Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm
BACKGROUND: TER measurements across confluent cellular monolayers provide a useful indication of TJ strength between epithelial and endothelial cells in culture. Having a reliable and accurate method of measuring cell-to-cell adhesion is critical to studies in pathophysiology and cancer metastasis....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-017-0053-6 |
_version_ | 1783235129029689344 |
---|---|
author | Sheller, Rebecca A. Cuevas, Maria E. Todd, Maria C. |
author_facet | Sheller, Rebecca A. Cuevas, Maria E. Todd, Maria C. |
author_sort | Sheller, Rebecca A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: TER measurements across confluent cellular monolayers provide a useful indication of TJ strength between epithelial and endothelial cells in culture. Having a reliable and accurate method of measuring cell-to-cell adhesion is critical to studies in pathophysiology and cancer metastasis. However, the use of different technical approaches to measure TER has reportedly yielded inconsistent measurements within the same cell lines. METHODS: In the current study, we compared the peak TER values for the MDCK (canine kidney) and MCF-7 (human breast cancer) epithelial cell lines using two common approaches (Chopstick and Endohm) and two types of polymer inserts (PC and PET). RESULTS: Both cell lines demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the peak TERs obtained using the two different approaches. Further, the MDCK (but not the MCF-7) cells demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the peak TERs when using the same approach but different inserts. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates the importance of using a single approach when seeking to measure and compare the TER values of cultured cell lines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5424405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54244052017-05-10 Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm Sheller, Rebecca A. Cuevas, Maria E. Todd, Maria C. Biol Proced Online Methodology BACKGROUND: TER measurements across confluent cellular monolayers provide a useful indication of TJ strength between epithelial and endothelial cells in culture. Having a reliable and accurate method of measuring cell-to-cell adhesion is critical to studies in pathophysiology and cancer metastasis. However, the use of different technical approaches to measure TER has reportedly yielded inconsistent measurements within the same cell lines. METHODS: In the current study, we compared the peak TER values for the MDCK (canine kidney) and MCF-7 (human breast cancer) epithelial cell lines using two common approaches (Chopstick and Endohm) and two types of polymer inserts (PC and PET). RESULTS: Both cell lines demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the peak TERs obtained using the two different approaches. Further, the MDCK (but not the MCF-7) cells demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the peak TERs when using the same approach but different inserts. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates the importance of using a single approach when seeking to measure and compare the TER values of cultured cell lines. BioMed Central 2017-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5424405/ /pubmed/28490975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-017-0053-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Sheller, Rebecca A. Cuevas, Maria E. Todd, Maria C. Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm |
title | Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm |
title_full | Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm |
title_fullStr | Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm |
title_short | Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm |
title_sort | comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: chopsticks vs. endohm |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-017-0053-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shellerrebeccaa comparisonoftransepithelialresistancemeasurementtechniqueschopsticksvsendohm AT cuevasmariae comparisonoftransepithelialresistancemeasurementtechniqueschopsticksvsendohm AT toddmariac comparisonoftransepithelialresistancemeasurementtechniqueschopsticksvsendohm |