Cargando…

Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm

BACKGROUND: TER measurements across confluent cellular monolayers provide a useful indication of TJ strength between epithelial and endothelial cells in culture. Having a reliable and accurate method of measuring cell-to-cell adhesion is critical to studies in pathophysiology and cancer metastasis....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheller, Rebecca A., Cuevas, Maria E., Todd, Maria C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-017-0053-6
_version_ 1783235129029689344
author Sheller, Rebecca A.
Cuevas, Maria E.
Todd, Maria C.
author_facet Sheller, Rebecca A.
Cuevas, Maria E.
Todd, Maria C.
author_sort Sheller, Rebecca A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: TER measurements across confluent cellular monolayers provide a useful indication of TJ strength between epithelial and endothelial cells in culture. Having a reliable and accurate method of measuring cell-to-cell adhesion is critical to studies in pathophysiology and cancer metastasis. However, the use of different technical approaches to measure TER has reportedly yielded inconsistent measurements within the same cell lines. METHODS: In the current study, we compared the peak TER values for the MDCK (canine kidney) and MCF-7 (human breast cancer) epithelial cell lines using two common approaches (Chopstick and Endohm) and two types of polymer inserts (PC and PET). RESULTS: Both cell lines demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the peak TERs obtained using the two different approaches. Further, the MDCK (but not the MCF-7) cells demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the peak TERs when using the same approach but different inserts. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates the importance of using a single approach when seeking to measure and compare the TER values of cultured cell lines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5424405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54244052017-05-10 Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm Sheller, Rebecca A. Cuevas, Maria E. Todd, Maria C. Biol Proced Online Methodology BACKGROUND: TER measurements across confluent cellular monolayers provide a useful indication of TJ strength between epithelial and endothelial cells in culture. Having a reliable and accurate method of measuring cell-to-cell adhesion is critical to studies in pathophysiology and cancer metastasis. However, the use of different technical approaches to measure TER has reportedly yielded inconsistent measurements within the same cell lines. METHODS: In the current study, we compared the peak TER values for the MDCK (canine kidney) and MCF-7 (human breast cancer) epithelial cell lines using two common approaches (Chopstick and Endohm) and two types of polymer inserts (PC and PET). RESULTS: Both cell lines demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the peak TERs obtained using the two different approaches. Further, the MDCK (but not the MCF-7) cells demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the peak TERs when using the same approach but different inserts. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates the importance of using a single approach when seeking to measure and compare the TER values of cultured cell lines. BioMed Central 2017-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5424405/ /pubmed/28490975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-017-0053-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Sheller, Rebecca A.
Cuevas, Maria E.
Todd, Maria C.
Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm
title Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm
title_full Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm
title_fullStr Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm
title_short Comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: Chopsticks vs. Endohm
title_sort comparison of transepithelial resistance measurement techniques: chopsticks vs. endohm
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-017-0053-6
work_keys_str_mv AT shellerrebeccaa comparisonoftransepithelialresistancemeasurementtechniqueschopsticksvsendohm
AT cuevasmariae comparisonoftransepithelialresistancemeasurementtechniqueschopsticksvsendohm
AT toddmariac comparisonoftransepithelialresistancemeasurementtechniqueschopsticksvsendohm