Cargando…
Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword?
CONTEXT: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a hereditary condition characterised by the predisposition to hyperplasia/tumours of endocrine glands. MEN1-related disease, moreover, malignancy related to MEN1, is increasingly responsible for death in up to two-thirds of patients. Although pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bioscientifica Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0006 |
_version_ | 1783235191194517504 |
---|---|
author | Casey, Ruth Therese Saunders, Deborah Challis, Benjamin George Pitfield, Deborah Cheow, Heok Shaw, Ashley Simpson, Helen Lisa |
author_facet | Casey, Ruth Therese Saunders, Deborah Challis, Benjamin George Pitfield, Deborah Cheow, Heok Shaw, Ashley Simpson, Helen Lisa |
author_sort | Casey, Ruth Therese |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a hereditary condition characterised by the predisposition to hyperplasia/tumours of endocrine glands. MEN1-related disease, moreover, malignancy related to MEN1, is increasingly responsible for death in up to two-thirds of patients. Although patients undergo radiological and biochemical surveillance, current recommendations for radiological monitoring are based on non-prospective data with little consensus or evidence demonstrating improved outcome from this approach. Here, we sought to determine whether cumulative radiation exposure as part of the recommended radiological screening programme posed a distinct risk in a cohort of patients with MEN1. PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 43 patients with MEN1 attending our institution between 2007 and 2015 was performed. Demographic and clinical information including phenotype was obtained for all patients. We also obtained details regarding all radiological procedures performed as part of MEN1 surveillance or disease localisation. An estimated effective radiation dose (ED) for each individual patient was calculated. RESULTS: The mean ED for the total patient cohort was 121 mSv, and the estimated mean lifetime risk of cancer secondary to radiation exposure was 0.49%. Patients with malignant neuroendocrine tumours (NETS) had significantly higher ED levels compared to patients without metastatic disease (P < 0.0022). CONCLUSIONS: In MEN1, radiological surveillance is associated with clinically significant exposure to ionising radiation. In patients with MEN1, multi-modality imaging strategies designed to minimise this exposure should be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5424776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Bioscientifica Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54247762017-05-22 Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword? Casey, Ruth Therese Saunders, Deborah Challis, Benjamin George Pitfield, Deborah Cheow, Heok Shaw, Ashley Simpson, Helen Lisa Endocr Connect Research CONTEXT: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a hereditary condition characterised by the predisposition to hyperplasia/tumours of endocrine glands. MEN1-related disease, moreover, malignancy related to MEN1, is increasingly responsible for death in up to two-thirds of patients. Although patients undergo radiological and biochemical surveillance, current recommendations for radiological monitoring are based on non-prospective data with little consensus or evidence demonstrating improved outcome from this approach. Here, we sought to determine whether cumulative radiation exposure as part of the recommended radiological screening programme posed a distinct risk in a cohort of patients with MEN1. PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 43 patients with MEN1 attending our institution between 2007 and 2015 was performed. Demographic and clinical information including phenotype was obtained for all patients. We also obtained details regarding all radiological procedures performed as part of MEN1 surveillance or disease localisation. An estimated effective radiation dose (ED) for each individual patient was calculated. RESULTS: The mean ED for the total patient cohort was 121 mSv, and the estimated mean lifetime risk of cancer secondary to radiation exposure was 0.49%. Patients with malignant neuroendocrine tumours (NETS) had significantly higher ED levels compared to patients without metastatic disease (P < 0.0022). CONCLUSIONS: In MEN1, radiological surveillance is associated with clinically significant exposure to ionising radiation. In patients with MEN1, multi-modality imaging strategies designed to minimise this exposure should be considered. Bioscientifica Ltd 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5424776/ /pubmed/28298337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0006 Text en © 2017 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Casey, Ruth Therese Saunders, Deborah Challis, Benjamin George Pitfield, Deborah Cheow, Heok Shaw, Ashley Simpson, Helen Lisa Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword? |
title | Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword? |
title_full | Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword? |
title_fullStr | Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword? |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword? |
title_short | Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword? |
title_sort | radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caseyruththerese radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword AT saundersdeborah radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword AT challisbenjamingeorge radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword AT pitfielddeborah radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword AT cheowheok radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword AT shawashley radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword AT simpsonhelenlisa radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword |