Cargando…

Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword?

CONTEXT: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a hereditary condition characterised by the predisposition to hyperplasia/tumours of endocrine glands. MEN1-related disease, moreover, malignancy related to MEN1, is increasingly responsible for death in up to two-thirds of patients. Although pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casey, Ruth Therese, Saunders, Deborah, Challis, Benjamin George, Pitfield, Deborah, Cheow, Heok, Shaw, Ashley, Simpson, Helen Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0006
_version_ 1783235191194517504
author Casey, Ruth Therese
Saunders, Deborah
Challis, Benjamin George
Pitfield, Deborah
Cheow, Heok
Shaw, Ashley
Simpson, Helen Lisa
author_facet Casey, Ruth Therese
Saunders, Deborah
Challis, Benjamin George
Pitfield, Deborah
Cheow, Heok
Shaw, Ashley
Simpson, Helen Lisa
author_sort Casey, Ruth Therese
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a hereditary condition characterised by the predisposition to hyperplasia/tumours of endocrine glands. MEN1-related disease, moreover, malignancy related to MEN1, is increasingly responsible for death in up to two-thirds of patients. Although patients undergo radiological and biochemical surveillance, current recommendations for radiological monitoring are based on non-prospective data with little consensus or evidence demonstrating improved outcome from this approach. Here, we sought to determine whether cumulative radiation exposure as part of the recommended radiological screening programme posed a distinct risk in a cohort of patients with MEN1. PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 43 patients with MEN1 attending our institution between 2007 and 2015 was performed. Demographic and clinical information including phenotype was obtained for all patients. We also obtained details regarding all radiological procedures performed as part of MEN1 surveillance or disease localisation. An estimated effective radiation dose (ED) for each individual patient was calculated. RESULTS: The mean ED for the total patient cohort was 121 mSv, and the estimated mean lifetime risk of cancer secondary to radiation exposure was 0.49%. Patients with malignant neuroendocrine tumours (NETS) had significantly higher ED levels compared to patients without metastatic disease (P < 0.0022). CONCLUSIONS: In MEN1, radiological surveillance is associated with clinically significant exposure to ionising radiation. In patients with MEN1, multi-modality imaging strategies designed to minimise this exposure should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5424776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54247762017-05-22 Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword? Casey, Ruth Therese Saunders, Deborah Challis, Benjamin George Pitfield, Deborah Cheow, Heok Shaw, Ashley Simpson, Helen Lisa Endocr Connect Research CONTEXT: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a hereditary condition characterised by the predisposition to hyperplasia/tumours of endocrine glands. MEN1-related disease, moreover, malignancy related to MEN1, is increasingly responsible for death in up to two-thirds of patients. Although patients undergo radiological and biochemical surveillance, current recommendations for radiological monitoring are based on non-prospective data with little consensus or evidence demonstrating improved outcome from this approach. Here, we sought to determine whether cumulative radiation exposure as part of the recommended radiological screening programme posed a distinct risk in a cohort of patients with MEN1. PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of 43 patients with MEN1 attending our institution between 2007 and 2015 was performed. Demographic and clinical information including phenotype was obtained for all patients. We also obtained details regarding all radiological procedures performed as part of MEN1 surveillance or disease localisation. An estimated effective radiation dose (ED) for each individual patient was calculated. RESULTS: The mean ED for the total patient cohort was 121 mSv, and the estimated mean lifetime risk of cancer secondary to radiation exposure was 0.49%. Patients with malignant neuroendocrine tumours (NETS) had significantly higher ED levels compared to patients without metastatic disease (P < 0.0022). CONCLUSIONS: In MEN1, radiological surveillance is associated with clinically significant exposure to ionising radiation. In patients with MEN1, multi-modality imaging strategies designed to minimise this exposure should be considered. Bioscientifica Ltd 2017-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5424776/ /pubmed/28298337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0006 Text en © 2017 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Casey, Ruth Therese
Saunders, Deborah
Challis, Benjamin George
Pitfield, Deborah
Cheow, Heok
Shaw, Ashley
Simpson, Helen Lisa
Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword?
title Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword?
title_full Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword?
title_fullStr Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword?
title_full_unstemmed Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword?
title_short Radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword?
title_sort radiological surveillance in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a double-edged sword?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28298337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0006
work_keys_str_mv AT caseyruththerese radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword
AT saundersdeborah radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword
AT challisbenjamingeorge radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword
AT pitfielddeborah radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword
AT cheowheok radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword
AT shawashley radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword
AT simpsonhelenlisa radiologicalsurveillanceinmultipleendocrineneoplasiatype1adoubleedgedsword