Cargando…

A meta-analysis of prognostic roles of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma

The prognostic role of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is a matter of ongoing debate. The aim of our study is to investigate the impact of RAS, BRAF, TERT promoter mutations and RET/PTC rearrangements on the prognosis of PTC patients. We performed a search in four electronic d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vuong, Huy Gia, Duong, Uyen N P, Altibi, Ahmed M A, Ngo, Hanh T T, Pham, Thong Quang, Tran, Hung Minh, Gandolfi, Greta, Hassell, Lewis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28219937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0010
_version_ 1783235200320274432
author Vuong, Huy Gia
Duong, Uyen N P
Altibi, Ahmed M A
Ngo, Hanh T T
Pham, Thong Quang
Tran, Hung Minh
Gandolfi, Greta
Hassell, Lewis
author_facet Vuong, Huy Gia
Duong, Uyen N P
Altibi, Ahmed M A
Ngo, Hanh T T
Pham, Thong Quang
Tran, Hung Minh
Gandolfi, Greta
Hassell, Lewis
author_sort Vuong, Huy Gia
collection PubMed
description The prognostic role of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is a matter of ongoing debate. The aim of our study is to investigate the impact of RAS, BRAF, TERT promoter mutations and RET/PTC rearrangements on the prognosis of PTC patients. We performed a search in four electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Virtual Health Library (VHL). Data of hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were directly obtained from original papers or indirectly estimated from Kaplan–Meier curve (KMC). Pooled HRs were calculated using random-effect model weighted by inverse variance method. Publication bias was assessed by using Egger’s regression test and visual inspection of funnel plots. From 2630 studies, we finally included 35 studies with 17,732 patients for meta-analyses. TERT promoter mutation was significantly associated with unfavorable DSS (HR = 7.64; 95% CI = 4.00–14.61) and DFS (HR = 2.98; 95% CI = 2.27–3.92). BRAF mutations significantly increased the risk for recurrence (HR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.27–2.10) but not for cancer mortality (HR = 1.41; 95% CI = 0.90–2.23). In subgroup analyses, BRAF mutation only showed its prognostic value in short-/medium-term follow-up. Data regarding RAS mutations and RET/PTC fusions were insufficient for meta-analyses. TERT promoter mutation can be used as an independent and reliable marker for risk stratification and predicting patient’s outcomes. The use of BRAF mutation to assess patient prognosis should be carefully considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5424840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54248402017-05-22 A meta-analysis of prognostic roles of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma Vuong, Huy Gia Duong, Uyen N P Altibi, Ahmed M A Ngo, Hanh T T Pham, Thong Quang Tran, Hung Minh Gandolfi, Greta Hassell, Lewis Endocr Connect Review The prognostic role of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is a matter of ongoing debate. The aim of our study is to investigate the impact of RAS, BRAF, TERT promoter mutations and RET/PTC rearrangements on the prognosis of PTC patients. We performed a search in four electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Virtual Health Library (VHL). Data of hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were directly obtained from original papers or indirectly estimated from Kaplan–Meier curve (KMC). Pooled HRs were calculated using random-effect model weighted by inverse variance method. Publication bias was assessed by using Egger’s regression test and visual inspection of funnel plots. From 2630 studies, we finally included 35 studies with 17,732 patients for meta-analyses. TERT promoter mutation was significantly associated with unfavorable DSS (HR = 7.64; 95% CI = 4.00–14.61) and DFS (HR = 2.98; 95% CI = 2.27–3.92). BRAF mutations significantly increased the risk for recurrence (HR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.27–2.10) but not for cancer mortality (HR = 1.41; 95% CI = 0.90–2.23). In subgroup analyses, BRAF mutation only showed its prognostic value in short-/medium-term follow-up. Data regarding RAS mutations and RET/PTC fusions were insufficient for meta-analyses. TERT promoter mutation can be used as an independent and reliable marker for risk stratification and predicting patient’s outcomes. The use of BRAF mutation to assess patient prognosis should be carefully considered. Bioscientifica Ltd 2017-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5424840/ /pubmed/28219937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0010 Text en © 2017 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Vuong, Huy Gia
Duong, Uyen N P
Altibi, Ahmed M A
Ngo, Hanh T T
Pham, Thong Quang
Tran, Hung Minh
Gandolfi, Greta
Hassell, Lewis
A meta-analysis of prognostic roles of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma
title A meta-analysis of prognostic roles of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma
title_full A meta-analysis of prognostic roles of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of prognostic roles of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of prognostic roles of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma
title_short A meta-analysis of prognostic roles of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma
title_sort meta-analysis of prognostic roles of molecular markers in papillary thyroid carcinoma
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28219937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0010
work_keys_str_mv AT vuonghuygia ametaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT duonguyennp ametaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT altibiahmedma ametaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT ngohanhtt ametaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT phamthongquang ametaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT tranhungminh ametaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT gandolfigreta ametaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT hasselllewis ametaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT vuonghuygia metaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT duonguyennp metaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT altibiahmedma metaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT ngohanhtt metaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT phamthongquang metaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT tranhungminh metaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT gandolfigreta metaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma
AT hasselllewis metaanalysisofprognosticrolesofmolecularmarkersinpapillarythyroidcarcinoma