Cargando…

Edwin Southern, DNA blotting, and microarray technology: A case study of the shifting role of patents in academic molecular biology

Edwin Southern developed a blotting technique for DNA in 1973, thereby creating a staple of molecular biology laboratory procedures still used after several decades. It became a seminal technology for studying the structure of DNA. The story of the creation and dissemination of this technology, whic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tofano, Daidree, Wiechers, Ilse R., Cook-Deegan, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424904/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-5354-2-2-50
_version_ 1783235210156965888
author Tofano, Daidree
Wiechers, Ilse R.
Cook-Deegan, Robert
author_facet Tofano, Daidree
Wiechers, Ilse R.
Cook-Deegan, Robert
author_sort Tofano, Daidree
collection PubMed
description Edwin Southern developed a blotting technique for DNA in 1973, thereby creating a staple of molecular biology laboratory procedures still used after several decades. It became a seminal technology for studying the structure of DNA. The story of the creation and dissemination of this technology, which was not patented and was freely distributed throughout the scientific community, stands as a case study in open science. The Southern blot was developed at a time when attitudes about commercial intrusion into health research were beginning to change and the practical value of molecular genetics was becoming apparent to industry. Interest from industry in fundamental molecular biological techniques meant that scientists began to think about commercial uses of their work even in otherwise "basic" research. The unpatented Southern blot is contrasted with later patented technologies, particularly microarray methods, which were created in the same environment by many of the same people, but which followed significant changes to UK policies encouraging commercialization of academic research and a norm shift friendlier to such commercialization within academic molecular biology. Professor Southern's personal experience illuminates how the technologies evolved, and his views provide insight into how scientists' attitudes about commercialization have changed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5424904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54249042017-05-16 Edwin Southern, DNA blotting, and microarray technology: A case study of the shifting role of patents in academic molecular biology Tofano, Daidree Wiechers, Ilse R. Cook-Deegan, Robert Genom Soc Policy Article Edwin Southern developed a blotting technique for DNA in 1973, thereby creating a staple of molecular biology laboratory procedures still used after several decades. It became a seminal technology for studying the structure of DNA. The story of the creation and dissemination of this technology, which was not patented and was freely distributed throughout the scientific community, stands as a case study in open science. The Southern blot was developed at a time when attitudes about commercial intrusion into health research were beginning to change and the practical value of molecular genetics was becoming apparent to industry. Interest from industry in fundamental molecular biological techniques meant that scientists began to think about commercial uses of their work even in otherwise "basic" research. The unpatented Southern blot is contrasted with later patented technologies, particularly microarray methods, which were created in the same environment by many of the same people, but which followed significant changes to UK policies encouraging commercialization of academic research and a norm shift friendlier to such commercialization within academic molecular biology. Professor Southern's personal experience illuminates how the technologies evolved, and his views provide insight into how scientists' attitudes about commercialization have changed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2006-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5424904/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-5354-2-2-50 Text en © ESRC Genomics Network 2006
spellingShingle Article
Tofano, Daidree
Wiechers, Ilse R.
Cook-Deegan, Robert
Edwin Southern, DNA blotting, and microarray technology: A case study of the shifting role of patents in academic molecular biology
title Edwin Southern, DNA blotting, and microarray technology: A case study of the shifting role of patents in academic molecular biology
title_full Edwin Southern, DNA blotting, and microarray technology: A case study of the shifting role of patents in academic molecular biology
title_fullStr Edwin Southern, DNA blotting, and microarray technology: A case study of the shifting role of patents in academic molecular biology
title_full_unstemmed Edwin Southern, DNA blotting, and microarray technology: A case study of the shifting role of patents in academic molecular biology
title_short Edwin Southern, DNA blotting, and microarray technology: A case study of the shifting role of patents in academic molecular biology
title_sort edwin southern, dna blotting, and microarray technology: a case study of the shifting role of patents in academic molecular biology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424904/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-5354-2-2-50
work_keys_str_mv AT tofanodaidree edwinsoutherndnablottingandmicroarraytechnologyacasestudyoftheshiftingroleofpatentsinacademicmolecularbiology
AT wiechersilser edwinsoutherndnablottingandmicroarraytechnologyacasestudyoftheshiftingroleofpatentsinacademicmolecularbiology
AT cookdeeganrobert edwinsoutherndnablottingandmicroarraytechnologyacasestudyoftheshiftingroleofpatentsinacademicmolecularbiology