Cargando…

What should scientists do outside the laboratory? lessons on science communication from the Japanese genome research project

It is essential for scientists to introduce their research in a comprehensible manner and to communicate with colleagues in the same/different fields and with the public. As genome research requires the massive expenditure of public funds, and raises ethical, legal, and social issues, genome scienti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Itoh, Machiko, Kato, Kazuto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424947/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-5354-1-2-80
_version_ 1783235218875875328
author Itoh, Machiko
Kato, Kazuto
author_facet Itoh, Machiko
Kato, Kazuto
author_sort Itoh, Machiko
collection PubMed
description It is essential for scientists to introduce their research in a comprehensible manner and to communicate with colleagues in the same/different fields and with the public. As genome research requires the massive expenditure of public funds, and raises ethical, legal, and social issues, genome scientists have communicated extensively with the public. In addition, they have established interdisciplinary collaborations that resulted in the creation of a new research field known as bioinformatics. We examined the history of communication activities involving Japanese genome scientists between 1989 and 2005 using extensive literature surveys and interviews. We found that genome researchers went through much trial and error, particularly with respect to collaborative interdisciplinary efforts, and although they early on recognized the necessity of communicating with colleagues in different fields, it was not until the introduction of a large governmental research budget, the Millennium Project (2000 - 2004), that individual researchers began to be actively engaged in communication activities. In conclusion, to facilitate the participation of scientists in communication activities, researchers who are acquainted with different research fields, community, and society should proactively function as coordinators of interdisciplinary programs or mediators of collaborative research. It is also of primal importance to present to scientists the advantage of dialogue with society scientifically and to design effective communication programs that provide researchers with such opportunities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5424947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54249472017-05-16 What should scientists do outside the laboratory? lessons on science communication from the Japanese genome research project Itoh, Machiko Kato, Kazuto Genom Soc Policy Article It is essential for scientists to introduce their research in a comprehensible manner and to communicate with colleagues in the same/different fields and with the public. As genome research requires the massive expenditure of public funds, and raises ethical, legal, and social issues, genome scientists have communicated extensively with the public. In addition, they have established interdisciplinary collaborations that resulted in the creation of a new research field known as bioinformatics. We examined the history of communication activities involving Japanese genome scientists between 1989 and 2005 using extensive literature surveys and interviews. We found that genome researchers went through much trial and error, particularly with respect to collaborative interdisciplinary efforts, and although they early on recognized the necessity of communicating with colleagues in different fields, it was not until the introduction of a large governmental research budget, the Millennium Project (2000 - 2004), that individual researchers began to be actively engaged in communication activities. In conclusion, to facilitate the participation of scientists in communication activities, researchers who are acquainted with different research fields, community, and society should proactively function as coordinators of interdisciplinary programs or mediators of collaborative research. It is also of primal importance to present to scientists the advantage of dialogue with society scientifically and to design effective communication programs that provide researchers with such opportunities. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2005-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5424947/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-5354-1-2-80 Text en © ESRC Genomics Network 2005
spellingShingle Article
Itoh, Machiko
Kato, Kazuto
What should scientists do outside the laboratory? lessons on science communication from the Japanese genome research project
title What should scientists do outside the laboratory? lessons on science communication from the Japanese genome research project
title_full What should scientists do outside the laboratory? lessons on science communication from the Japanese genome research project
title_fullStr What should scientists do outside the laboratory? lessons on science communication from the Japanese genome research project
title_full_unstemmed What should scientists do outside the laboratory? lessons on science communication from the Japanese genome research project
title_short What should scientists do outside the laboratory? lessons on science communication from the Japanese genome research project
title_sort what should scientists do outside the laboratory? lessons on science communication from the japanese genome research project
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5424947/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-5354-1-2-80
work_keys_str_mv AT itohmachiko whatshouldscientistsdooutsidethelaboratorylessonsonsciencecommunicationfromthejapanesegenomeresearchproject
AT katokazuto whatshouldscientistsdooutsidethelaboratorylessonsonsciencecommunicationfromthejapanesegenomeresearchproject