Cargando…
The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability
Mirror visual feedback (MVF) training is a promising technique to promote activation in the lesioned hemisphere following stroke, and aid recovery. However, current outcomes of MVF training are mixed, in part, due to variability in the task undertaken during MVF. The present study investigated the h...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5425477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00242 |
_version_ | 1783235308365545472 |
---|---|
author | Yarossi, Mathew Manuweera, Thushini Adamovich, Sergei V. Tunik, Eugene |
author_facet | Yarossi, Mathew Manuweera, Thushini Adamovich, Sergei V. Tunik, Eugene |
author_sort | Yarossi, Mathew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mirror visual feedback (MVF) training is a promising technique to promote activation in the lesioned hemisphere following stroke, and aid recovery. However, current outcomes of MVF training are mixed, in part, due to variability in the task undertaken during MVF. The present study investigated the hypothesis that movements directed toward visual targets may enhance MVF modulation of motor cortex (M1) excitability ipsilateral to the trained hand compared to movements without visual targets. Ten healthy subjects participated in a 2 × 2 factorial design in which feedback (veridical, mirror) and presence of a visual target (target present, target absent) for a right index-finger flexion task were systematically manipulated in a virtual environment. To measure M1 excitability, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the hemisphere ipsilateral to the trained hand to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the untrained first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles at rest prior to and following each of four 2-min blocks of 30 movements (B1–B4). Targeted movement kinematics without visual feedback was measured before and after training to assess learning and transfer. FDI MEPs were decreased in B1 and B2 when movements were made with veridical feedback and visual targets were absent. FDI MEPs were decreased in B2 and B3 when movements were made with mirror feedback and visual targets were absent. FDI MEPs were increased in B3 when movements were made with mirror feedback and visual targets were present. Significant MEP changes were not present for the uninvolved ADM, suggesting a task-specific effect. Analysis of kinematics revealed learning occurred in visual target-directed conditions, but transfer was not sensitive to mirror feedback. Results are discussed with respect to current theoretical mechanisms underlying MVF-induced changes in ipsilateral excitability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5425477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54254772017-05-26 The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability Yarossi, Mathew Manuweera, Thushini Adamovich, Sergei V. Tunik, Eugene Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Mirror visual feedback (MVF) training is a promising technique to promote activation in the lesioned hemisphere following stroke, and aid recovery. However, current outcomes of MVF training are mixed, in part, due to variability in the task undertaken during MVF. The present study investigated the hypothesis that movements directed toward visual targets may enhance MVF modulation of motor cortex (M1) excitability ipsilateral to the trained hand compared to movements without visual targets. Ten healthy subjects participated in a 2 × 2 factorial design in which feedback (veridical, mirror) and presence of a visual target (target present, target absent) for a right index-finger flexion task were systematically manipulated in a virtual environment. To measure M1 excitability, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the hemisphere ipsilateral to the trained hand to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the untrained first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles at rest prior to and following each of four 2-min blocks of 30 movements (B1–B4). Targeted movement kinematics without visual feedback was measured before and after training to assess learning and transfer. FDI MEPs were decreased in B1 and B2 when movements were made with veridical feedback and visual targets were absent. FDI MEPs were decreased in B2 and B3 when movements were made with mirror feedback and visual targets were absent. FDI MEPs were increased in B3 when movements were made with mirror feedback and visual targets were present. Significant MEP changes were not present for the uninvolved ADM, suggesting a task-specific effect. Analysis of kinematics revealed learning occurred in visual target-directed conditions, but transfer was not sensitive to mirror feedback. Results are discussed with respect to current theoretical mechanisms underlying MVF-induced changes in ipsilateral excitability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5425477/ /pubmed/28553218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00242 Text en Copyright © 2017 Yarossi, Manuweera, Adamovich and Tunik. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Yarossi, Mathew Manuweera, Thushini Adamovich, Sergei V. Tunik, Eugene The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability |
title | The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability |
title_full | The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability |
title_short | The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability |
title_sort | effects of mirror feedback during target directed movements on ipsilateral corticospinal excitability |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5425477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00242 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yarossimathew theeffectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability AT manuweerathushini theeffectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability AT adamovichsergeiv theeffectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability AT tunikeugene theeffectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability AT yarossimathew effectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability AT manuweerathushini effectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability AT adamovichsergeiv effectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability AT tunikeugene effectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability |