Cargando…

The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability

Mirror visual feedback (MVF) training is a promising technique to promote activation in the lesioned hemisphere following stroke, and aid recovery. However, current outcomes of MVF training are mixed, in part, due to variability in the task undertaken during MVF. The present study investigated the h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yarossi, Mathew, Manuweera, Thushini, Adamovich, Sergei V., Tunik, Eugene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5425477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00242
_version_ 1783235308365545472
author Yarossi, Mathew
Manuweera, Thushini
Adamovich, Sergei V.
Tunik, Eugene
author_facet Yarossi, Mathew
Manuweera, Thushini
Adamovich, Sergei V.
Tunik, Eugene
author_sort Yarossi, Mathew
collection PubMed
description Mirror visual feedback (MVF) training is a promising technique to promote activation in the lesioned hemisphere following stroke, and aid recovery. However, current outcomes of MVF training are mixed, in part, due to variability in the task undertaken during MVF. The present study investigated the hypothesis that movements directed toward visual targets may enhance MVF modulation of motor cortex (M1) excitability ipsilateral to the trained hand compared to movements without visual targets. Ten healthy subjects participated in a 2 × 2 factorial design in which feedback (veridical, mirror) and presence of a visual target (target present, target absent) for a right index-finger flexion task were systematically manipulated in a virtual environment. To measure M1 excitability, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the hemisphere ipsilateral to the trained hand to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the untrained first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles at rest prior to and following each of four 2-min blocks of 30 movements (B1–B4). Targeted movement kinematics without visual feedback was measured before and after training to assess learning and transfer. FDI MEPs were decreased in B1 and B2 when movements were made with veridical feedback and visual targets were absent. FDI MEPs were decreased in B2 and B3 when movements were made with mirror feedback and visual targets were absent. FDI MEPs were increased in B3 when movements were made with mirror feedback and visual targets were present. Significant MEP changes were not present for the uninvolved ADM, suggesting a task-specific effect. Analysis of kinematics revealed learning occurred in visual target-directed conditions, but transfer was not sensitive to mirror feedback. Results are discussed with respect to current theoretical mechanisms underlying MVF-induced changes in ipsilateral excitability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5425477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54254772017-05-26 The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability Yarossi, Mathew Manuweera, Thushini Adamovich, Sergei V. Tunik, Eugene Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Mirror visual feedback (MVF) training is a promising technique to promote activation in the lesioned hemisphere following stroke, and aid recovery. However, current outcomes of MVF training are mixed, in part, due to variability in the task undertaken during MVF. The present study investigated the hypothesis that movements directed toward visual targets may enhance MVF modulation of motor cortex (M1) excitability ipsilateral to the trained hand compared to movements without visual targets. Ten healthy subjects participated in a 2 × 2 factorial design in which feedback (veridical, mirror) and presence of a visual target (target present, target absent) for a right index-finger flexion task were systematically manipulated in a virtual environment. To measure M1 excitability, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the hemisphere ipsilateral to the trained hand to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the untrained first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles at rest prior to and following each of four 2-min blocks of 30 movements (B1–B4). Targeted movement kinematics without visual feedback was measured before and after training to assess learning and transfer. FDI MEPs were decreased in B1 and B2 when movements were made with veridical feedback and visual targets were absent. FDI MEPs were decreased in B2 and B3 when movements were made with mirror feedback and visual targets were absent. FDI MEPs were increased in B3 when movements were made with mirror feedback and visual targets were present. Significant MEP changes were not present for the uninvolved ADM, suggesting a task-specific effect. Analysis of kinematics revealed learning occurred in visual target-directed conditions, but transfer was not sensitive to mirror feedback. Results are discussed with respect to current theoretical mechanisms underlying MVF-induced changes in ipsilateral excitability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5425477/ /pubmed/28553218 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00242 Text en Copyright © 2017 Yarossi, Manuweera, Adamovich and Tunik. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Yarossi, Mathew
Manuweera, Thushini
Adamovich, Sergei V.
Tunik, Eugene
The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability
title The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability
title_full The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability
title_fullStr The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability
title_short The Effects of Mirror Feedback during Target Directed Movements on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Excitability
title_sort effects of mirror feedback during target directed movements on ipsilateral corticospinal excitability
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5425477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28553218
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00242
work_keys_str_mv AT yarossimathew theeffectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability
AT manuweerathushini theeffectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability
AT adamovichsergeiv theeffectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability
AT tunikeugene theeffectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability
AT yarossimathew effectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability
AT manuweerathushini effectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability
AT adamovichsergeiv effectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability
AT tunikeugene effectsofmirrorfeedbackduringtargetdirectedmovementsonipsilateralcorticospinalexcitability