Cargando…
Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Based on promising results from a Phase I study of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and cisplatin powder (DDP-H) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (UMIN-CTR000003541), a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II study was conducted to ev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5425991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3320-7 |
_version_ | 1783235378325487616 |
---|---|
author | Kamimura, Kenya Suda, Takeshi Yokoo, Takeshi Kamimura, Hiroteru Kanefuji, Tsutomu Tsuchiya, Atsunori Takamura, Masaaki Kawai, Hirokazu Waguri, Nobuo Yamagiwa, Satoshi Terai, Shuji |
author_facet | Kamimura, Kenya Suda, Takeshi Yokoo, Takeshi Kamimura, Hiroteru Kanefuji, Tsutomu Tsuchiya, Atsunori Takamura, Masaaki Kawai, Hirokazu Waguri, Nobuo Yamagiwa, Satoshi Terai, Shuji |
author_sort | Kamimura, Kenya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Based on promising results from a Phase I study of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and cisplatin powder (DDP-H) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (UMIN-CTR000003541), a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy versus miriplatin monotherapy. METHODS: Nineteen patients, five and fourteen Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer staging classification A and B cases, respectively, were randomly assigned to receive either miriplatin monotherapy (n = 9) or miriplatin/DDP-H combination therapy (n = 10). DDP-H and/or miriplatin were administered through the hepatic arteries supplying the lobes of the liver containing tumors, and progression free survival was analyzed as a primary end point in addition to other secondary endpoints. The corresponding therapy was repeated unless disease progression or severe adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The monotherapy or combination therapy was performed for 15 or 36 sessions in total, respectively. Although there were no significant differences between the two groups for treatment intervals (p = 0.96) or the dose of miriplatin used in each session (p = 0.99), the progression free survival and overall disease control rate were significantly better in the combination therapy group (91 vs 423 days, p = 0.025; 40.0 vs 77.8%, p = 0.0025, respectively). Consistent with these observations, a trend of a significantly slower increase in des-γ-carboxyprothrombin was observed, and the number of treatment sessions was nearly significantly larger in the combination therapy group (p < 0.0001, p = 0.057, respectively). Conversely, the median survival time did not show a significant difference (706 days, monotherapy vs 733 days, combination therapy; p = 0.40). A significant decrease in cholinesterase was observed during the course of treatment only in patients receiving combination therapy (r = −0.86, p < 0.0001). A few cases in both arms showed hematological and/or non-hematological toxicities that were categorized as grade 1 (NCI-CTCAE). CONCLUSIONS: The higher disease control effects with the combination of miriplatin and DDP-H indicate that it is a promising alternative treatment for cases with multiple HCCs, especially for those that can tolerate the treatment without experiencing a reduction in hepatic reserve. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on 1 January 2012 with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm, UMIN000004691). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5425991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54259912017-05-12 Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial Kamimura, Kenya Suda, Takeshi Yokoo, Takeshi Kamimura, Hiroteru Kanefuji, Tsutomu Tsuchiya, Atsunori Takamura, Masaaki Kawai, Hirokazu Waguri, Nobuo Yamagiwa, Satoshi Terai, Shuji BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Based on promising results from a Phase I study of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and cisplatin powder (DDP-H) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (UMIN-CTR000003541), a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy versus miriplatin monotherapy. METHODS: Nineteen patients, five and fourteen Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer staging classification A and B cases, respectively, were randomly assigned to receive either miriplatin monotherapy (n = 9) or miriplatin/DDP-H combination therapy (n = 10). DDP-H and/or miriplatin were administered through the hepatic arteries supplying the lobes of the liver containing tumors, and progression free survival was analyzed as a primary end point in addition to other secondary endpoints. The corresponding therapy was repeated unless disease progression or severe adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The monotherapy or combination therapy was performed for 15 or 36 sessions in total, respectively. Although there were no significant differences between the two groups for treatment intervals (p = 0.96) or the dose of miriplatin used in each session (p = 0.99), the progression free survival and overall disease control rate were significantly better in the combination therapy group (91 vs 423 days, p = 0.025; 40.0 vs 77.8%, p = 0.0025, respectively). Consistent with these observations, a trend of a significantly slower increase in des-γ-carboxyprothrombin was observed, and the number of treatment sessions was nearly significantly larger in the combination therapy group (p < 0.0001, p = 0.057, respectively). Conversely, the median survival time did not show a significant difference (706 days, monotherapy vs 733 days, combination therapy; p = 0.40). A significant decrease in cholinesterase was observed during the course of treatment only in patients receiving combination therapy (r = −0.86, p < 0.0001). A few cases in both arms showed hematological and/or non-hematological toxicities that were categorized as grade 1 (NCI-CTCAE). CONCLUSIONS: The higher disease control effects with the combination of miriplatin and DDP-H indicate that it is a promising alternative treatment for cases with multiple HCCs, especially for those that can tolerate the treatment without experiencing a reduction in hepatic reserve. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on 1 January 2012 with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm, UMIN000004691). BioMed Central 2017-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5425991/ /pubmed/28490356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3320-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kamimura, Kenya Suda, Takeshi Yokoo, Takeshi Kamimura, Hiroteru Kanefuji, Tsutomu Tsuchiya, Atsunori Takamura, Masaaki Kawai, Hirokazu Waguri, Nobuo Yamagiwa, Satoshi Terai, Shuji Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and cddp powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5425991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3320-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kamimurakenya transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sudatakeshi transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yokootakeshi transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kamimurahiroteru transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kanefujitsutomu transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tsuchiyaatsunori transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT takamuramasaaki transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kawaihirokazu transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wagurinobuo transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yamagiwasatoshi transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT teraishuji transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial |