Cargando…

Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Based on promising results from a Phase I study of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and cisplatin powder (DDP-H) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (UMIN-CTR000003541), a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II study was conducted to ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamimura, Kenya, Suda, Takeshi, Yokoo, Takeshi, Kamimura, Hiroteru, Kanefuji, Tsutomu, Tsuchiya, Atsunori, Takamura, Masaaki, Kawai, Hirokazu, Waguri, Nobuo, Yamagiwa, Satoshi, Terai, Shuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5425991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3320-7
_version_ 1783235378325487616
author Kamimura, Kenya
Suda, Takeshi
Yokoo, Takeshi
Kamimura, Hiroteru
Kanefuji, Tsutomu
Tsuchiya, Atsunori
Takamura, Masaaki
Kawai, Hirokazu
Waguri, Nobuo
Yamagiwa, Satoshi
Terai, Shuji
author_facet Kamimura, Kenya
Suda, Takeshi
Yokoo, Takeshi
Kamimura, Hiroteru
Kanefuji, Tsutomu
Tsuchiya, Atsunori
Takamura, Masaaki
Kawai, Hirokazu
Waguri, Nobuo
Yamagiwa, Satoshi
Terai, Shuji
author_sort Kamimura, Kenya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Based on promising results from a Phase I study of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and cisplatin powder (DDP-H) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (UMIN-CTR000003541), a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy versus miriplatin monotherapy. METHODS: Nineteen patients, five and fourteen Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer staging classification A and B cases, respectively, were randomly assigned to receive either miriplatin monotherapy (n = 9) or miriplatin/DDP-H combination therapy (n = 10). DDP-H and/or miriplatin were administered through the hepatic arteries supplying the lobes of the liver containing tumors, and progression free survival was analyzed as a primary end point in addition to other secondary endpoints. The corresponding therapy was repeated unless disease progression or severe adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The monotherapy or combination therapy was performed for 15 or 36 sessions in total, respectively. Although there were no significant differences between the two groups for treatment intervals (p = 0.96) or the dose of miriplatin used in each session (p = 0.99), the progression free survival and overall disease control rate were significantly better in the combination therapy group (91 vs 423 days, p = 0.025; 40.0 vs 77.8%, p = 0.0025, respectively). Consistent with these observations, a trend of a significantly slower increase in des-γ-carboxyprothrombin was observed, and the number of treatment sessions was nearly significantly larger in the combination therapy group (p < 0.0001, p = 0.057, respectively). Conversely, the median survival time did not show a significant difference (706 days, monotherapy vs 733 days, combination therapy; p = 0.40). A significant decrease in cholinesterase was observed during the course of treatment only in patients receiving combination therapy (r = −0.86, p < 0.0001). A few cases in both arms showed hematological and/or non-hematological toxicities that were categorized as grade 1 (NCI-CTCAE). CONCLUSIONS: The higher disease control effects with the combination of miriplatin and DDP-H indicate that it is a promising alternative treatment for cases with multiple HCCs, especially for those that can tolerate the treatment without experiencing a reduction in hepatic reserve. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on 1 January 2012 with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm, UMIN000004691).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5425991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54259912017-05-12 Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial Kamimura, Kenya Suda, Takeshi Yokoo, Takeshi Kamimura, Hiroteru Kanefuji, Tsutomu Tsuchiya, Atsunori Takamura, Masaaki Kawai, Hirokazu Waguri, Nobuo Yamagiwa, Satoshi Terai, Shuji BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Based on promising results from a Phase I study of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and cisplatin powder (DDP-H) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (UMIN-CTR000003541), a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy versus miriplatin monotherapy. METHODS: Nineteen patients, five and fourteen Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer staging classification A and B cases, respectively, were randomly assigned to receive either miriplatin monotherapy (n = 9) or miriplatin/DDP-H combination therapy (n = 10). DDP-H and/or miriplatin were administered through the hepatic arteries supplying the lobes of the liver containing tumors, and progression free survival was analyzed as a primary end point in addition to other secondary endpoints. The corresponding therapy was repeated unless disease progression or severe adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The monotherapy or combination therapy was performed for 15 or 36 sessions in total, respectively. Although there were no significant differences between the two groups for treatment intervals (p = 0.96) or the dose of miriplatin used in each session (p = 0.99), the progression free survival and overall disease control rate were significantly better in the combination therapy group (91 vs 423 days, p = 0.025; 40.0 vs 77.8%, p = 0.0025, respectively). Consistent with these observations, a trend of a significantly slower increase in des-γ-carboxyprothrombin was observed, and the number of treatment sessions was nearly significantly larger in the combination therapy group (p < 0.0001, p = 0.057, respectively). Conversely, the median survival time did not show a significant difference (706 days, monotherapy vs 733 days, combination therapy; p = 0.40). A significant decrease in cholinesterase was observed during the course of treatment only in patients receiving combination therapy (r = −0.86, p < 0.0001). A few cases in both arms showed hematological and/or non-hematological toxicities that were categorized as grade 1 (NCI-CTCAE). CONCLUSIONS: The higher disease control effects with the combination of miriplatin and DDP-H indicate that it is a promising alternative treatment for cases with multiple HCCs, especially for those that can tolerate the treatment without experiencing a reduction in hepatic reserve. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on 1 January 2012 with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm, UMIN000004691). BioMed Central 2017-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5425991/ /pubmed/28490356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3320-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kamimura, Kenya
Suda, Takeshi
Yokoo, Takeshi
Kamimura, Hiroteru
Kanefuji, Tsutomu
Tsuchiya, Atsunori
Takamura, Masaaki
Kawai, Hirokazu
Waguri, Nobuo
Yamagiwa, Satoshi
Terai, Shuji
Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial
title Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and CDDP powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort transhepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using a combination of miriplatin and cddp powder versus miriplatin alone in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5425991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3320-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kamimurakenya transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sudatakeshi transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yokootakeshi transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kamimurahiroteru transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kanefujitsutomu transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tsuchiyaatsunori transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT takamuramasaaki transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kawaihirokazu transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wagurinobuo transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yamagiwasatoshi transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT teraishuji transhepaticarterialinfusionchemotherapyusingacombinationofmiriplatinandcddppowderversusmiriplatinaloneinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinomaarandomizedcontrolledtrial