Cargando…

Comparative measurements of bone mineral density and bone contrast values in canine femora using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional digital radiography

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening due to bone remodelling processes after total hip replacement is one common cause for revision surgery. In human medicine, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the gold standard for quantitative evaluation of bone mineral density, whereas in veterinary medicine co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lucas, K., Nolte, I., Galindo-Zamora, V., Lerch, M., Stukenborg-Colsman, C., Behrens, B. A., Bouguecha, A., Betancur, S., Almohallami, A., Wefstaedt, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1047-y
_version_ 1783235386749747200
author Lucas, K.
Nolte, I.
Galindo-Zamora, V.
Lerch, M.
Stukenborg-Colsman, C.
Behrens, B. A.
Bouguecha, A.
Betancur, S.
Almohallami, A.
Wefstaedt, P.
author_facet Lucas, K.
Nolte, I.
Galindo-Zamora, V.
Lerch, M.
Stukenborg-Colsman, C.
Behrens, B. A.
Bouguecha, A.
Betancur, S.
Almohallami, A.
Wefstaedt, P.
author_sort Lucas, K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening due to bone remodelling processes after total hip replacement is one common cause for revision surgery. In human medicine, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the gold standard for quantitative evaluation of bone mineral density, whereas in veterinary medicine conventional radiography is used for follow-up studies. Recently, a method has been described using digital X-ray images for quantitative assessment of grey scale values of bone contrast. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the correlation of bone mineral density (BMD) measured by DEXA with grey scale values (GV) measured in digital X-ray images (RX50, RX66) ex vivo. RESULTS: The measured GV in the chosen X-ray settings showed on average a good correlation (r = 0.61) to the measured BMD with DEXA. Correlation between the two X-ray settings was very good (r = 0.81). For comparisons among regions of interests (ROIs) a difference of 8.2% was found to be statistically significant, whereas in the case of RX50 and RX66 differences of 5.3% and 4.1% were found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that measuring absolute changes in bone mineral density might be possible using digital radiography. Not all significant differences between ROIs detectable with DEXA can be displayed in the X-ray images because of the lower sensitivity of the radiographs. However, direct comparison of grey scale values of the periprosthetic femur in one individual patient during the follow-up period, in order to predict bone remodelling processes, should be possible, but with a lesser sensitivity than with DEXA. It is important that the same X-ray settings are chosen for each patient for follow-up studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12917-017-1047-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5426025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54260252017-05-12 Comparative measurements of bone mineral density and bone contrast values in canine femora using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional digital radiography Lucas, K. Nolte, I. Galindo-Zamora, V. Lerch, M. Stukenborg-Colsman, C. Behrens, B. A. Bouguecha, A. Betancur, S. Almohallami, A. Wefstaedt, P. BMC Vet Res Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening due to bone remodelling processes after total hip replacement is one common cause for revision surgery. In human medicine, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is the gold standard for quantitative evaluation of bone mineral density, whereas in veterinary medicine conventional radiography is used for follow-up studies. Recently, a method has been described using digital X-ray images for quantitative assessment of grey scale values of bone contrast. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the correlation of bone mineral density (BMD) measured by DEXA with grey scale values (GV) measured in digital X-ray images (RX50, RX66) ex vivo. RESULTS: The measured GV in the chosen X-ray settings showed on average a good correlation (r = 0.61) to the measured BMD with DEXA. Correlation between the two X-ray settings was very good (r = 0.81). For comparisons among regions of interests (ROIs) a difference of 8.2% was found to be statistically significant, whereas in the case of RX50 and RX66 differences of 5.3% and 4.1% were found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that measuring absolute changes in bone mineral density might be possible using digital radiography. Not all significant differences between ROIs detectable with DEXA can be displayed in the X-ray images because of the lower sensitivity of the radiographs. However, direct comparison of grey scale values of the periprosthetic femur in one individual patient during the follow-up period, in order to predict bone remodelling processes, should be possible, but with a lesser sensitivity than with DEXA. It is important that the same X-ray settings are chosen for each patient for follow-up studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12917-017-1047-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5426025/ /pubmed/28490330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1047-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Lucas, K.
Nolte, I.
Galindo-Zamora, V.
Lerch, M.
Stukenborg-Colsman, C.
Behrens, B. A.
Bouguecha, A.
Betancur, S.
Almohallami, A.
Wefstaedt, P.
Comparative measurements of bone mineral density and bone contrast values in canine femora using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional digital radiography
title Comparative measurements of bone mineral density and bone contrast values in canine femora using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional digital radiography
title_full Comparative measurements of bone mineral density and bone contrast values in canine femora using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional digital radiography
title_fullStr Comparative measurements of bone mineral density and bone contrast values in canine femora using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional digital radiography
title_full_unstemmed Comparative measurements of bone mineral density and bone contrast values in canine femora using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional digital radiography
title_short Comparative measurements of bone mineral density and bone contrast values in canine femora using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional digital radiography
title_sort comparative measurements of bone mineral density and bone contrast values in canine femora using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and conventional digital radiography
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1047-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lucask comparativemeasurementsofbonemineraldensityandbonecontrastvaluesincaninefemorausingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandconventionaldigitalradiography
AT noltei comparativemeasurementsofbonemineraldensityandbonecontrastvaluesincaninefemorausingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandconventionaldigitalradiography
AT galindozamorav comparativemeasurementsofbonemineraldensityandbonecontrastvaluesincaninefemorausingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandconventionaldigitalradiography
AT lerchm comparativemeasurementsofbonemineraldensityandbonecontrastvaluesincaninefemorausingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandconventionaldigitalradiography
AT stukenborgcolsmanc comparativemeasurementsofbonemineraldensityandbonecontrastvaluesincaninefemorausingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandconventionaldigitalradiography
AT behrensba comparativemeasurementsofbonemineraldensityandbonecontrastvaluesincaninefemorausingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandconventionaldigitalradiography
AT bouguechaa comparativemeasurementsofbonemineraldensityandbonecontrastvaluesincaninefemorausingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandconventionaldigitalradiography
AT betancurs comparativemeasurementsofbonemineraldensityandbonecontrastvaluesincaninefemorausingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandconventionaldigitalradiography
AT almohallamia comparativemeasurementsofbonemineraldensityandbonecontrastvaluesincaninefemorausingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandconventionaldigitalradiography
AT wefstaedtp comparativemeasurementsofbonemineraldensityandbonecontrastvaluesincaninefemorausingdualenergyxrayabsorptiometryandconventionaldigitalradiography