Cargando…

Measured, opportunistic, unexpected and naïve quitting: a qualitative grounded theory study of the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective

BACKGROUND: To better understand the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective, and to explore the role spontaneity and planning play in quitting. METHODS: Qualitative grounded theory study using in-depth interviews with 37 Australian adult ex-smokers (24–68 years; 15 males, 22 females) w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Andrea L, Carter, Stacy M, Dunlop, Sally M, Freeman, Becky, Chapman, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4326-4
_version_ 1783235393193246720
author Smith, Andrea L
Carter, Stacy M
Dunlop, Sally M
Freeman, Becky
Chapman, Simon
author_facet Smith, Andrea L
Carter, Stacy M
Dunlop, Sally M
Freeman, Becky
Chapman, Simon
author_sort Smith, Andrea L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To better understand the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective, and to explore the role spontaneity and planning play in quitting. METHODS: Qualitative grounded theory study using in-depth interviews with 37 Australian adult ex-smokers (24–68 years; 15 males, 22 females) who quit smoking in the past 6–24 months (26 quit unassisted; 11 used assistance). RESULTS: Based on participants’ accounts of quitting, we propose a typology of quitting experiences: measured, opportunistic, unexpected and naïve. Two key features integral to participants’ accounts of their quitting experiences were used as the basis of the typology: (1) the apparent onset of quitting (gradual through to sudden); and (2) the degree to which the smoker appeared to have prepared for quitting (no evidence through to clear evidence of preparation). The resulting 2 × 2 matrix of quitting experiences took into consideration three additional characteristics: (1) the presence or absence of a clearly identifiable trigger; (2) the amount of effort (cognitive and practical) involved in quitting; and (3) the type of cognitive process that characterised the quitting experience (reflective; impulsive; reflective and impulsive). CONCLUSIONS: Quitting typically included elements of spontaneity (impulsive behaviour) and preparation (reflective behaviour), and, importantly, the investment of time and cognitive effort by participants prior to quitting. Remarkably few participants quit completely out-of-the-blue with little or no preparation. Findings are discussed in relation to stages-of-change theory, catastrophe theory, and dual process theories, focusing on how dual process theories may provide a way of conceptualising how quitting can include elements of both spontaneity and preparation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4326-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5426051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54260512017-05-12 Measured, opportunistic, unexpected and naïve quitting: a qualitative grounded theory study of the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective Smith, Andrea L Carter, Stacy M Dunlop, Sally M Freeman, Becky Chapman, Simon BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: To better understand the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective, and to explore the role spontaneity and planning play in quitting. METHODS: Qualitative grounded theory study using in-depth interviews with 37 Australian adult ex-smokers (24–68 years; 15 males, 22 females) who quit smoking in the past 6–24 months (26 quit unassisted; 11 used assistance). RESULTS: Based on participants’ accounts of quitting, we propose a typology of quitting experiences: measured, opportunistic, unexpected and naïve. Two key features integral to participants’ accounts of their quitting experiences were used as the basis of the typology: (1) the apparent onset of quitting (gradual through to sudden); and (2) the degree to which the smoker appeared to have prepared for quitting (no evidence through to clear evidence of preparation). The resulting 2 × 2 matrix of quitting experiences took into consideration three additional characteristics: (1) the presence or absence of a clearly identifiable trigger; (2) the amount of effort (cognitive and practical) involved in quitting; and (3) the type of cognitive process that characterised the quitting experience (reflective; impulsive; reflective and impulsive). CONCLUSIONS: Quitting typically included elements of spontaneity (impulsive behaviour) and preparation (reflective behaviour), and, importantly, the investment of time and cognitive effort by participants prior to quitting. Remarkably few participants quit completely out-of-the-blue with little or no preparation. Findings are discussed in relation to stages-of-change theory, catastrophe theory, and dual process theories, focusing on how dual process theories may provide a way of conceptualising how quitting can include elements of both spontaneity and preparation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4326-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5426051/ /pubmed/28490317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4326-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith, Andrea L
Carter, Stacy M
Dunlop, Sally M
Freeman, Becky
Chapman, Simon
Measured, opportunistic, unexpected and naïve quitting: a qualitative grounded theory study of the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective
title Measured, opportunistic, unexpected and naïve quitting: a qualitative grounded theory study of the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective
title_full Measured, opportunistic, unexpected and naïve quitting: a qualitative grounded theory study of the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective
title_fullStr Measured, opportunistic, unexpected and naïve quitting: a qualitative grounded theory study of the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective
title_full_unstemmed Measured, opportunistic, unexpected and naïve quitting: a qualitative grounded theory study of the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective
title_short Measured, opportunistic, unexpected and naïve quitting: a qualitative grounded theory study of the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective
title_sort measured, opportunistic, unexpected and naïve quitting: a qualitative grounded theory study of the process of quitting from the ex-smokers’ perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4326-4
work_keys_str_mv AT smithandreal measuredopportunisticunexpectedandnaivequittingaqualitativegroundedtheorystudyoftheprocessofquittingfromtheexsmokersperspective
AT carterstacym measuredopportunisticunexpectedandnaivequittingaqualitativegroundedtheorystudyoftheprocessofquittingfromtheexsmokersperspective
AT dunlopsallym measuredopportunisticunexpectedandnaivequittingaqualitativegroundedtheorystudyoftheprocessofquittingfromtheexsmokersperspective
AT freemanbecky measuredopportunisticunexpectedandnaivequittingaqualitativegroundedtheorystudyoftheprocessofquittingfromtheexsmokersperspective
AT chapmansimon measuredopportunisticunexpectedandnaivequittingaqualitativegroundedtheorystudyoftheprocessofquittingfromtheexsmokersperspective