Cargando…
Cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes
BACKGROUND: The inserted cochlear implanted electrode is covered at the site of the round window or cochleostomy to prevent infections and leakage. In a surgically hearing preservational concept, low intracochlear pressure changes are of high importance. The aim of this study was to observe intracoc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0218-y |
_version_ | 1783235396459560960 |
---|---|
author | Todt, Ingo Utca, Julica Karimi, Dania Ernst, Arne Mittmann, Philipp |
author_facet | Todt, Ingo Utca, Julica Karimi, Dania Ernst, Arne Mittmann, Philipp |
author_sort | Todt, Ingo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The inserted cochlear implanted electrode is covered at the site of the round window or cochleostomy to prevent infections and leakage. In a surgically hearing preservational concept, low intracochlear pressure changes are of high importance. The aim of this study was to observe intracochlear pressure changes due to different sealing techniques in a cochlear model. METHODS: Cochlear implant electrode insertions were performed in an artifical cochlear model and the intracochlear pressure changes were recorded in parallel with a micro-pressure sensor positioned in the apical region of the cochlea model to follow the maximum amplitude of intracochlear pressure. Four different sealing conditions were compared: 1) overlay, 2) overlay with fascia pushed in, 3) donut-like fascia ring, 4) donut-like fascia ring pushed in. RESULTS: We found statistically significant differences in the occurrence of maximum amplitude of intracochlear pressure peak changes related to sealing procedure comparing the different techniques. While the lowest amplitude changes could be observed for the overlay technique (0.14 mmHg ± 0.06) the highest values could be observed for the donut-like pushed in technique (1.79 mmHg ± 0.69). CONCLUSION: Sealing the electrode inserted cochlea can lead to significant intracochlear pressure changes. Pushing in of the sealing tissue cannot be recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5426068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54260682017-05-12 Cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes Todt, Ingo Utca, Julica Karimi, Dania Ernst, Arne Mittmann, Philipp J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The inserted cochlear implanted electrode is covered at the site of the round window or cochleostomy to prevent infections and leakage. In a surgically hearing preservational concept, low intracochlear pressure changes are of high importance. The aim of this study was to observe intracochlear pressure changes due to different sealing techniques in a cochlear model. METHODS: Cochlear implant electrode insertions were performed in an artifical cochlear model and the intracochlear pressure changes were recorded in parallel with a micro-pressure sensor positioned in the apical region of the cochlea model to follow the maximum amplitude of intracochlear pressure. Four different sealing conditions were compared: 1) overlay, 2) overlay with fascia pushed in, 3) donut-like fascia ring, 4) donut-like fascia ring pushed in. RESULTS: We found statistically significant differences in the occurrence of maximum amplitude of intracochlear pressure peak changes related to sealing procedure comparing the different techniques. While the lowest amplitude changes could be observed for the overlay technique (0.14 mmHg ± 0.06) the highest values could be observed for the donut-like pushed in technique (1.79 mmHg ± 0.69). CONCLUSION: Sealing the electrode inserted cochlea can lead to significant intracochlear pressure changes. Pushing in of the sealing tissue cannot be recommended. BioMed Central 2017-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5426068/ /pubmed/28490377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0218-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Todt, Ingo Utca, Julica Karimi, Dania Ernst, Arne Mittmann, Philipp Cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes |
title | Cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes |
title_full | Cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes |
title_fullStr | Cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes |
title_full_unstemmed | Cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes |
title_short | Cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes |
title_sort | cochlear implant electrode sealing techniques and related intracochlear pressure changes |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5426068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0218-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT todtingo cochlearimplantelectrodesealingtechniquesandrelatedintracochlearpressurechanges AT utcajulica cochlearimplantelectrodesealingtechniquesandrelatedintracochlearpressurechanges AT karimidania cochlearimplantelectrodesealingtechniquesandrelatedintracochlearpressurechanges AT ernstarne cochlearimplantelectrodesealingtechniquesandrelatedintracochlearpressurechanges AT mittmannphilipp cochlearimplantelectrodesealingtechniquesandrelatedintracochlearpressurechanges |